Jump to content

Anyone running 265/70/18's?


LT1MCSS

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is anyone running a 265/70/18 over a stock 265/65/18 tire?

 

I'm trying to decide between sticking with a stock 265/65 tire or move to a 265/70 or a 275/65

 

It doesn't seem like there are a ton of options out there for either the stock 265/65 or the 265/70. There are quite a few options out there for 275/65's. Clearly the 275 is more popular.

 

One of the advantages of the 265/70 is that the tires are relatively the same weight as the 265/65 tire and its not any wider. It doesn't appear like it will add much in terms of rolling resistance and weight. Some concerns I have with the 265/70 though is that the tire is going to look funny proportion wise seeing how tall it is vs the width. Its about an inch taller than the factory tire but yet still 10.43" wide.

 

With the 275/65, size wise i think this is the perfect tire. Although it comes with its advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is i think proportionally it will be better than the narrower 265. On the down side some sets of these tires are as much as $150 more than a set of matching 265/70's. Along with that weight you're also picking up an extra 8-10lbs per tire (according to Tirerack weights) plus adding almost a half inch in width all around which would add to the rolling resistance. The added weight and width will have negative effects on gas mileage I'm sure but the question is how much.

 

Anyone else have any thoughts on the subject?

 

If it makes a difference this would be going on a stock ride height 2009 Avalanche with a 2" Rough Country Leveling Kit

Posted

I'm running Cooper AT3's P275/65/18s on mine. Stock suspension with no rubbing highway or offroad. They look much better than the smaller stock tires. Went from LT245/75/17C to these and after my tune was readjusted for the tire size it seems I might have lost .5mpg. Daily drive the truck to work. 55mph two lanes. 18.5-19.5MPG Summer and 16.5-17.5MPG Winter.

Posted

Thanks for the input. The more i dug into it last night it seems like the 275/65/18 is the better tire to run. In my case I won't have to adjust for tire size in the computer size my truck already has 275/55/20's on it. Its only a 0.54% tire diameter difference.

 

I'm looking at the:

Cooper Discoverer AT3's

Nitto Terra Grappler

Yokohama Geolander ATS

Bridgestone Dueler Revo2

 

I would love to get a set of Cooper Zeon LTZ's but they don't make them in that size in 18's. The AT3's seem decent. They are the cheapest out of the group by more than $200. I'm not the biggest fan of the sidewall design but it's not horrible.

Posted

The 275/65s are a good choice, thats what I run. It fills the wheel wells better and haven't had any rubbing issues. The Coopers are good tires, great on snow and ice but seem to like to throw rocks when on gravel as most AT tires do. They also don't seem to self clean when going through deep mud as well as others we've tried. Not sure about longevity as we just started to use them on work vehicles and don't have many miles on them yet.

Posted

I've been very happy with my 275/65/18 Cooper AT3's so far. I went with the 6-ply (Load range C), LT version. MPG drop is hardly noticable.

Posted

Im running the P275/65/18 Toyo AT-IIs on my Commander. Went with the P rating to keep weight down and they were very affordable... ~$160ish each shipped. Theres an LT version as well.

 

... kind of wish i went with the LT version to help the sidewall when aired down offroad.

Posted

Im running the P275/65/18 Toyo AT-IIs on my Commander. Went with the P rating to keep weight down and they were very affordable... ~$160ish each shipped. Theres an LT version as well.

 

... kind of wish i went with the LT version to help the sidewall when aired down offroad.

 

 

The Toyo Open Country AT2's caught my eye as well.

Posted

Matt, how do you like the new Toyo's O/C II's?

 

 

They're very similar to the previous version that I ran on my 2005. So far, so good. Smooth and quiet on the street. Haven't had them in any real snow yet but I really liked the originals so I'm not expecting them to be much different.

 

Was very impressed with them offroad and on the rocks. They were gripping rock surfaces extremely well, and even my old man pointed out that my A/T tires seemed to grip & climb up rocks easier than some of the M/T tires on the other trucks.

 

stuffthroughoffroading225.jpg

Posted

I ran a set of the orginal set on my Sierra, at about 50% + of tire wear I noticed they'd spin farily easily. Those were '20 so I'm not sure if that had anything to do with it. How many miles you got on them now? I'll keep bugging you until your past 50% to see if you have the same results. Other than I loved the tires.

Posted

I only have about 5k on my current set. I had 30k on them when I traded my Silverado. My old man had in the high 70k range when he replaced them on his expedition. And I used to install them on plow trucks at work that would run them down to practically bald... never noticed decreased traction until they got down almost to the wear indicators.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,993
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    President Roberto
    Newest Member
    President Roberto
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 224 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't wanna do major surgery/upgrades, behind-the-dash work, add amps, change radio etc. on my '26 std cab WT. On the WT, it has the base 7" IOR infotainment setup, and only two speakers (doors). Since I listen to classical, looked around for speakers that do well and dug thru reviews. Two-way speakers were found to be better than 3-way. So I've ordered a pair of  Infinity Reference REF-9632IX 2 way speakers.  [These may  or may not have been discontinued / succeeded by the 3-way ...9633 ones.]    These speakers are lauded for 3 ohm and 94db sensitivity spec so they'll work well for ordinary base car radios without amps and offer better performance (quality,  strength) than  default base paper-cone speakers. They'll be installed in a few days and I'll let y'all know what I think. Bill W San Jose      
    • Thanks!   Changed out the rear shocks today to Bilstein 5100s.  So far feel much better. The stock Rancho were wore out.  Lots of heavy hauling (2 moves, home renovations, etc).  Next up is new BFG tires Monday.  Cant wait the current tires have little to no wet traction and are super loud (hum)    
    • Ok, I got the all the codes. What do you all think would be a place to start?
    • How about I just point to the factory pans stand pipe little drain plug and claim its a pan with a real drain plug !. I just couldn't swallow the fact that a Dorman pan which at this point is probably the only pan out there that fits the gas version truck cost that much up here in Canada so I decided initially anyway to skip it and see what I thought of pulling the pan method and down the road if I felt inclined enough then I would either install a drain plug kit in the factory pan if there is enough room for it, or have a bung welded onto it, or put an aftermarket pan on. The thing is if the pan is not pulled then the magnets in the pan can't be inspected and cleaned or if wanting to change out the filter. However of course it certainly would make the job easier to be able to drop the oil first before having to handle the pan if dropping the pan that go around was the goal.    I knew a guy locally that was doing custom field spraying years ago with a pickup pulling a ground driven sprayer, I believe it was a GM pickup with an automatic trans. He had a drain plug in his pan and would drop the oil out of it once a week and top it back up through the dipstick tube to keep refreshing a portion of the oil often and that made the transmission last far longer than had he done nothing. Soft fields pulling 500 gallons of water at the start of each mixed up sprayer tank batch and in low range sucking along. I imagine he got some tips from other custom sprayer outfits doing the same thing at the time and learning from their blown up tranny mistakes. Transmissions then had no lock up converter so would cook the crap out of the fluid slipping that much and it would not have been synthetic fluid either. 
    • 3.39 Kroger’s in Montgomery Texas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...