Jump to content

BDS kit, wider stance.


Recommended Posts

Posted

So I have decided I want a 4 inch lift with 33's, my only issue is I cannot decide between the CST or BDS kit.

 

What bothers me about the BDS kit is the front track width is increased by 1.5 inches. To me it just looks goofy to have the front wheels sticking out more than the rears. Obviously the upside to the CST is it maintains factory track width.

 

What seems to be the downside to CST is the kit seems to just use strut spacers, where I believe the BDS comes with new struts all together. Also, the CST uses blocks in the rear, the BDS is available with new leaf springs. The CST angles look even better than the BDS angles, funny enough.

 

This truck is my daily driver, so I need ease of maintenance, lower operating cost, and reliability. I only want a 4 inch lift, and nothing more. I have no desire to move up to 35 inch tires.

 

 

If you had to pick a kit, which would you go for?

Posted

1.5 body lift and 2.5 level kit. 4 inches. way cheaper. no increase in track width. otherwise i'd go bds. but i'm partial because i've owned it before and really enjoyed it.

Posted

I can only agree that the lifts that push the front wheels out further than the rears look funny to me as well. I wouldn't have a lift that did that.

 

 

Sent using Tapatalk

Posted

My 3in zone Body lift says it will clear 33s, cost under $400

 

Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Posted

If money isn't a concern, then go with the CST. However, my vote is also to go with the body lift & level kit combo, if you're only wanting around 4" of lift.

Posted

I went with the CST kit NO Complaints. Great quality it is pricey when compared to the level and body lift. I figured if I went with the BDS I would need flares anad the price would be comparable.

Posted

What about the Rancho 4 inch kit? I have heard this nets around 5 inches of lift and with a true 33 inch tire, looks perfect for stance.

 

i know nothing about Rancho, is their quality comparable to CST and BDS?

 

So far I am leaning towards CST, but cannot find anyone who stocks it in Canada as of yet. I am on hold now until I learn more about the Rancho kit.

Posted

The Rancho yields ~5-6" of lift and also pushes the front track out. It is also a good quality kit though.

 

 

NUKE_1

 

How is your CST lift holding up? Was it an easy kit to install? Would you go with it again if you could do it over?

 

Just curious, how far do your wheels stick out past the body of the truck? I have mudflaps I want to keep, and they stick out 1 inch past the body, so I am hoping with the CST lift and the same offset as you have, I will have minimal tire sticking out past the mudflap.

 

One last question, what is your fender height measure out at?

 

Thanks.

Posted

I only have 8K miles on the truck with the lift, only average 5K/yr no issues with it yet. It took 8 hours to install without busting my but and i'm sure I could do it faster. That was using a lift in the garage with all the right tools available. I would use the kit again, but would look and see what else is available, maybe FTS? Tires don't stick out enough for me to want flares, fenders are at ~41.5 Both Front and Rear I am thinking of adding a 1" higher block in the rear and changing from the CST shocks to Bilsteins. only changing shocks because the CST's would be too short if I added another inch. The mudflaps may or may not clear, I did do a little trimming on the plastic and the fender still have minor rub in reverse at full lock. I will switch to a little shorter tire in the future, probably go with the terra-grappler next time. I need to get the truck re-aligned again since putting miles on the truck and the front end settling a little after the initial alignment.

Posted

i vote if you do a 1.5 body lift nobody will know so why not go the cheap route keep the ride almost identical (with adding a 2.5 level kit) youll get your 4 inches with no issues at all and it can be returned to stock easily. save your money to spend on other things like the wheels and tires

Posted

i vote if you do a 1.5 body lift nobody will know so why not go the cheap route keep the ride almost identical (with adding a 2.5 level kit) youll get your 4 inches with no issues at all and it can be returned to stock easily. save your money to spend on other things like the wheels and tires

 

 

I've been debating this. The original reason I considered the 4 inch lift was because with the BDS kit, it only takes a few parts to switch it over to a 6 inch. I have considered a 6 inch lift to guarantee I won't have any rubbing issues. The only reason I am considering 4 and not 6 is because the 6 inch lift with 33's seems to look weird. There is just too much gap in the wells, and the truck sits so much higher than the tires.

 

I've been reading more lately and now it seems the 4 inch CST doesn't get you a full 4 inches of lift. In the few photos I have seen, the BDS kit sits quite a bit higher than the CST. I love BDS and their products, the ONLY thing stopping me from the BDS lift is track width. I cannot stand front wheels sticking out wider than the rears, it just isn't natural.

 

The shop I phoned for a quote yesterday told me BDS makes 2 versions of lifts, ones that maintain track width and ones that widen it. I have never heard that, and I need to phone BDS yet to confirm.

Posted

Why not just get rear wheel spacers?

 

 

Well, a few reasons. To begin with, I can't find any good chrome wheels that I like, that will come even remotely close to fitting in the wheel well without sticking out, on a BDS lift. Since the track width is increased, wheels that would have fit flush on the front before, don't now, which limits my options drastically. The second reason is I have heard spacers can cause issues such as broken studs or lug nuts coming loose. I haven't looked into it much, but my old boss, a 30 year mechanic suggested I stay away from them. I've been meaning to research them but haven't as of yet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • $3.90 to $4.50 depending on the brand and location of the station. 87 regular. 
    • Guys that read Dizzy's thread know that eons ago after multiple manifold pulls to clear the CCV orifice I converted it to a PCV system with an orifice below it via the valve cover. The blow-by (sticky rings) was so bad it was impossible to keep clean and accumulated water in the oil in the winter when the moisture would freeze in the fresh air side. The PCV functioning mainly as a check valve. I carefully sized the orifice to reproduce the factory values for crankcase pressure at idle.    Well...took a slug of oil to get my attention but the ring seal improvement meant the system was over drafting sucking oil up and out the breather. (V8 guys with orifice systems are nodding their heads). So today I choked it down...allot....to replicate the "just enough to hold a piece of paper on the fresh air side at idle". May still be to much but I'm working with shims at the moment. When I get it sorted I'll make a proper plate and plug. Perhaps using carburetor jets to tune it.    So I guess this means it isn't my imagination.    Dizzy is a pig guys so don't go expecting huge moves in equipment (your equipment) that is in much better shape. A needle valve....lord that just came to me....
    • I had a new engine installed with under 5,000 miles. It shut off coming around a residential street corner and wouldn't restart. Dealer indicated it seized. New one has been fine since with 10,000 miles on the replaced engine. Annoying but I was given a loaner for the 5 weeks it was down. I won't go with the 6.2l gasser so it's 3.0l again. I love the economy and it tows my enclosed car trailer just fine. 
    • Coming back from towing a car to my daughter in Nashville truck started making a screaming noise from underneath.  Pulled over placed in park and sure enough whining noise from underneath.  Dropped at the dealer fearing new tranny or another front pump/cover replacement.  Service writer said it sounded like the tranny too...  Well $300, new idler and a belt all is good.  Pop the hood and give a listen. lol  Now I'm telling dealers I'm no longer interested in a new truck.
    • HD uses the 6.6 gas.   Oil consumption while heavy working is considered normal.  1 quart per 100 gallons of fuel is the normal rate above 8600lbs GVWR.  If more than that, it is considered excessive.   They will have to perform an oil consumption test using the guidelines in TSB 03-06-01-023J.     Information on Engine Oil Consumption Guidelines All engines require oil to lubricate and protect the load bearing and internal moving parts from wear including cylinder walls, pistons, and piston rings. When a piston moves down its cylinder, a thin film of oil is left on the cylinder wall. During the combustion process, part of this oil layer is consumed. As a result, varying rates of oil consumption are accepted as normal in all engines. Oil Consumption Oil usage has a direct relationship with the amount of fuel used. The harder an engine works, the more fuel and oil it will use. Therefore, oil usage as a factor of fuel usage is a more accurate indicator of acceptable oil consumption levels than vehicle mileage for vehicles at or above 8600 GVW. The accepted rate of oil consumption for gasoline engines in vehicles at or above 8600 GVW is 1 liter (1 qt) within 400 liters (100 gallons) of fuel used. This rate only applies to vehicles under warranty, maintained in accordance with the appropriate maintenance schedule, driven at legal speeds and within design intent of the vehicle. Many factors can affect an owner's concern with oil consumption. Driving habits and vehicle maintenance vary from owner to owner. Thoroughly evaluate each case before deciding whether the vehicle in question has abnormal engine oil consumption. Gasket and External Leaks Inspect the oil pans, engine covers, and the engine oil cooler for leakage. Inspect for oil leakage into the engine coolant. Improper Reading of the Oil Level Indicator (Dipstick) The vehicle must be parked on a level surface to obtain accurate oil level readings. Verify that the dipstick tube is fully seated in the block. When checking the oil level, make sure the dipstick is wiped clean before taking an oil level reading and fully depress the dipstick until the shoulder bottoms out on the dipstick tube. The dipstick should be the proper part number for the engine/vehicle that is being checked. Not Waiting Long Enough After Running Engine to Check Oil Level The vehicle should be allowed to sit for at least 15 minutes, after the engine has been shut off, before taking an oil level reading to assure the oil has had enough time to drain back into the crankcase. In order to ensure accurate results, the temperature of the oil should be close to the same temperature as the last time the oil level was checked. Improper Oil Fill After an Oil Change Following an oil change, verify that the proper amount and type of oil was put in the engine and that the oil level on the dipstick is not above the full mark or below the add marks. Refer to the Owner's Manual or Service Manual for information on recommended oil quantity, viscosity, and quality. High Speed or High RPM Driving Continuous driving at high speeds/high RPMs may increase oil consumption. Because this may not always be an everyday occurrence, it is hard to determine exactly how much the oil economy will be affected. Towing or Heavy Usage Towing a trailer or hauling additional weight will increase oil consumption. Large frontal area trailers will further increase the work required from the engine, especially at highway speeds, and thus increases the rate of oil consumption. PTO Operation Operation of a PTO will increase fuel and oil usage, as the PTO driven accessory uses engine power to operate. Crankcase Ventilation System Verify that the positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) system is operating properly. Blockages, restrictions, or damage to the PCV system can result in increased oil use. Oil Dilution from Condensation On vehicles that are usually driven short distances, less than 8 km (5 mi), especially in colder weather, condensation generated from cold engine operation may not get hot enough to evaporate out of the oil. When this occurs, the dipstick may indicate that the oil level is over-full. Subsequent driving on a trip of sufficient length to enable normal engine operating temperature for 30 minutes or more, in order to vaporize excess moisture, may give the customer the impression of excessive oil consumption. Engine Temperature If an engine is run at overheated temperatures (see Owner's Manual or Service Manual) for more than brief periods, oil will oxidize at a faster than normal rate. In addition, gaskets may distort, piston rings may stick, and excessive wear may result. Verify that all cooling system components are in proper working order. Engine Wear Piston scuffing, excessive piston-to-wall clearance, tapered or out of round cylinders, worn, damaged or improperly installed valve guides, seals and piston rings will all cause an increase in oil consumption. Measurement of Oil Consumption Engines require a period of time to BREAK IN so that moving parts are properly seated. Therefore, oil economy should not be tested until the vehicle has accumulated at least 6400 km (4000 mi). An exception would be allowed only if an engine is reported to be using more than 0.946 liter (1 qt) in 1600 km (1000 mi).   Verify that the engine has no external leaks. Repair as necessary. Verify that the engine is at normal operating temperature (see Owner's Manual or Service Manual). Park the vehicle on a level surface. Wait at least 15 minutes, after the engine is shut off, before checking the oil level to make sure that most of the oil has had time to drain back into the crankcase. Check the oil level and record the vehicle mileage, date, and exact oil level on the form included in this bulletin. Next ensure the oil level is at, but not above, the full mark on the dipstick. add oil if necessary. Also ensure the proper viscosity and quality oil are being used as recommended in the Owner Manual Ask the customer once they have consumed 100 gallons of fuel schedule an appointment and return to the dealer for inspection. If the final evaluation shows that the engine uses more than 0.946 liter (1 qt) in 379 liters (100 gallons) of fuel used, follow the published symptom diagnostics as described in the appropriate Service Manual. If the oil consumption test shows that the engine uses less than 0.946 liter (1 qt) in 379 liters (100 gallons) of fuel used, explain to the customer that their engine meets the guidelines for oil consumption.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...