Jump to content

5.3 Gen IV a bad engine?

tonyghkbve
 Share

Recommended Posts

tonyghkbve Enthusiast

tonyghkbve

Posted
Posted (edited)

I work at an auto parts store and I have mechanic who said he repairs these 5.3 motors and said they are "junk". THey burn oil like crazy and they're not well built. Idk if he's honest or what. I'm sure the 5.3 is a good engine, perhaps he might be telling the truth or just a plain hater of the 5.3 vortec. On the other hand, how good is the L9H 6.2 engine?

Edited by txab
  • Like 1
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

MaverickZ71
MaverickZ71

The original question asked about the 5.3L "Generation IV" V8, right? Which includes engines manufactured from 2007-2013? I'd sure like to hear about some 2007-2013 GM 5.3 engines with 200-300K mile

ATMINF
ATMINF

The current motor is all based around the LS1 that came out in 1997 in the corvette. Of these motors I have had one in my 2001 suburban and my current 2006 Silverado. Both of these trucks have been gr

MikeNH
MikeNH

The 5.3 is by far the most common of the engines. For the Gen III motors it was produced at a 2:1 ratio compared to the 4.8 or even the LS1. So to say dealers only have a few is absurd.

RyanbabZ71 Senior Enthusiast

RyanbabZ71

Posted
Posted

:nonod:

 

I am one person and I have owned 2 with no issues.

 

I would take remarks like his with a grain of salt. There are thousands upon thousands of these engines in different variations with no issues out there. Are there issues out there? No question anything that is manufactured is going to have issues.

  • Like 2
tonyghkbve Enthusiast

tonyghkbve

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Only thing that bothers me about that engine is that it consumes oil. That alone scares me. I don't want to invest so much money a month on truck that burns oil. My corolla burns oil sometimes, no doubt, it's a 22 year old car with over 160K miles and also its my fault for putting 5w20 in that car. I don't why I put such thin oil in my corolla. Next time I will use 10w40. Fortunately, I got that car for free. I just use it as a work car. The 2009-13 Silverado crew cab I want will be a pleasure/dating vehicle, which I won't drive very often. I do want that 6.2 as preference, but will settle for 5.3 if the 6.2 can't be found. With that being said, I hope that 5.3 AFM engine oil consumption is just a myth.

kstruckcountry Senior Enthusiast

kstruckcountry

Posted
Posted

I agree with the issues thing too. I'd say no matter what there will always be issues with some engines out of a given design. And I think the 5.3 has very few, even compared to many other engines.



He sure is, he's so damn proud of his crappy '01 Tiburon. He told me he invested over $12K in that POS.

Fast and Furious style huh?

tonyghkbve Enthusiast

tonyghkbve

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I agree with the issues thing too. I'd say no matter what there will always be issues with some engines out of a given design. And I think the 5.3 has very few, even compared to many other engines.

 

 

Fast and Furious style huh?

Perhaps. But overall, I just want to make sure. This forum here is my go-to source concerning Chevy Silverados. I'm definetly getting the 6.2.

Daryl LBZ Senior Enthusiast

Daryl LBZ

Posted
Posted

If I was getting a new half ton, the 6.2 would be the only option for me :D

 

 

Good Man! :thumbs:

Daryl LBZ Senior Enthusiast

Daryl LBZ

Posted
Posted

But that's kind of like saying if I was buying a 2500 it would be a Duramax. Because I'm not doing either anytime soon, lol

 

 

I can't blame you.

music Senior Enthusiast

music

Posted
Posted

If you happen to have a motor with problems, then sure... it's a bad motor. Mine has been great, as has everybody's that I personally know. A mechanic only sees a vehicle when there's a problem, and if they specialize in something, then they will see it a lot. My old '93 accord had a well known issue, where the distributor wears out prematurely, and the motor shuts down. Won't start, until you replace it and the ignition pack. If a Honda mechanic fixes this problem more than anything else on that year Honda, does it make it "junk"? The real question is much simpler: how many 5.3 motors does a general mechanic work on, out of *all* other cars/motors? Based on my own experience, I'd say it's a very low percentage, but that doesn't mean that it won't happen to me.

ATMINF Enthusiast

ATMINF

Posted
Posted

The 5.3 motor has been known to be a 200-300k mile motor. They are robust and durable.

  • Like 1
MaverickZ71 Senior Enthusiast

MaverickZ71

Posted
Posted (edited)

The 5.3 motor has been known to be a 200-300k mile motor. They are robust and durable.

 

The original question asked about the 5.3L "Generation IV" V8, right? Which includes engines manufactured from 2007-2013? I'd sure like to hear about some 2007-2013 GM 5.3 engines with 200-300K miles without problems, because all you read about on this forum is ticking AFM lifters which self-destruct later, and owners having to add oil every 2000 miles or so to keep the d*mned things from blowing up! I'm starting to believe that some on this forum keep trying to 'sweep the problems under the rug' so as to not decrease their future trade/resale values, but for others of us, these problems are unfortunately very real. My 29k-mile ticking LC9 seems to be developing quite a thirst for 5W-30, and it's not from abuse or pulling heavy trailers. At 15-16 mpg overall even with AFM, I'd GLADLY tell GM that they can keep their AFM and give me a quiet, problem-free engine!!

Edited by Maverick Z71
  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • teamjnz
      Stabilitrak conversion to Z71

      By teamjnz · Posted

      Sounds like converting will be a bigger endeavor than I was thinking. This truck doesn't have 2Hi like the Suburban did. The Tahoe has 4Hi and 4Lo and a button to turn of traction control.   From what I understand the Stabilitrak uses open diff in the front and rear. When wheel speed is not the same the stabilitrak uses the ABS system to slowdown the spinning wheel(s) to transfer power to the slower non-spinning wheel(s). I thought the transfer case was open too. Being able to transfer power either more to front or rear depending on wheel spin. Maybe I miss understood some information with you saying and power transfer is 50-50. Thanks
    • PunchT37
      OCI, not when but why?

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      My brother has a 2007 Avalanche with afm 5.3. It`s got 176,000 miles. Runs like a clock. Never been apart. Co worker has a 2010 Tahoe with afm 5.3. 230,000 miles. Never been apart. Runs like a clock. So, even though cyl deac is a weak spot, they can go the distance.   BUT, these engines had the oil changed regularly, AND had 5w30 as spec. I wonder if they would have lasted this far on 0w20? I`ll bet not.
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • davester
      Tranmission stays in Low

      By davester · Posted

      get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • asilverblazer
      OCI, not when but why?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...