Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

And all it costs is your first born child.

 

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

 

http://www.rigidindustries.com/mounting-options/46511

60 bucks for a direct no hassle fit is worth it to me... You don't have to buy their lights

 

There is also a kit on ebay that people have posted

Edited by KUUG
Posted

This is only for the GMC, and it clearly states it's for 2007-2013. So this won't work on our trucks.

Posted

Gotcha, Yes If I had a GMC I would have probably just bought this kit.

 

But I love the way my dual cube set up came out, looks bad A$$

Posted

I have the rigid single square dually or d2 fog replacement setup. Just waiting on slights to show up - install looks ver simple and shouldn't take more than a hour or so. I will post up pics once I have it all put together -

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Posted

I have the rigid single square dually or d2 fog replacement setup. Just waiting on slights to show up - install looks ver simple and shouldn't take more than a hour or so. I will post up pics once I have it all put together -

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Posted (edited)

I would be interested in how you do with the install. I have been thinking about a light bar behind the grill and now lately considering the fog light replacement. Did you order the floods or the spots? Thanks

Edited by whaler
Posted

Ordered the driving lights - I have a 20" combo in the slot above the license plate (removed) as well

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Posted

Gotcha, Yes If I had a GMC I would have probably just bought this kit.

 

But I love the way my dual cube set up came out, looks bad A$$

 

They turned out real good, I can't wait to do it to mine. It will probably get done right before hunting season. Have you posted any pictures of it back together yet?

Posted

How does the light bar behind the grill work for you? Also how about the performance of the fogs VS stock! Truck looks great.

Posted

DUALLY FOGS NEED OUTPUT PICS RIGHT MEOWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Like 3
Posted

That escalated quite quickly^^

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

... Also how about the performance of the fogs VS stock! Truck looks great.

 

 

Gonna be night and day difference. Stockers are 500 lumens. He's probably got 5000-10000 lumens in there now.

Posted

I don't have any night shots yet, but YES there is a BIG difference between my current set up and the stock set up.

 

The Fogs are pointed just slightly out to provide better side light and the bar takes care of the center light need.

 

My LED Bar is also a combo beam so overall the light spread is great between the bar and the fogs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,931 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...