Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

thanks, I want to do a front and rear drop so that's why I was looking at the whole kit.

 

it costs more to buy it all separate and the u-bolts aren't sold for you its something you just have to buy on your own hoping it fits right

 

maybe I can figure out a way to not need the kit to do it, I saw someone say they just slipped the front strut under the mount and bolted it in place to get the 2" drop and its free except the bolts you buy so if that's accurate all I need to buy is the rear shackles and figure out what to do about the u-bolts being too long

Imo I wouldn't do the strut under the control arm thing. When you move the strut under the arm your putting the entire weight of your front end on 2 bolts. For the rear I'm currently running factory u bolts with the blocks on top the springs, which isn't the best idea either. Soon I'll be changing to 2wd nbs u bolts
Posted (edited)

Imo I wouldn't do the strut under the control arm thing. When you move the strut under the arm your putting the entire weight of your front end on 2 bolts. For the rear I'm currently running factory u bolts with the blocks on top the springs, which isn't the best idea either. Soon I'll be changing to 2wd nbs u bolts

yea I hadn't thought about how its supported but it cant have that much weight since they use plastic spacers for all of the lift kits for it

 

mine is the 2wd so to get 3" im going 2" drop shackle and removing the block making the u-bolts be 1 1/2" too long after, so I should get about a 3 1/4" drop in the rear

 

so since swapping the strut mount to he bottom is out, for the front I cant decide the best way to drop it, there are drop spindles and then there are drop strut bodies you reuse the stock hardware with and they both average $150-$175 in price. I want to leave stock unchanged as much as possible and do the simpler less intrusive mod to it which I think is the drop strut but it is also the most scary dealing with spring compression and trusting I can put it all back together right and safely

Edited by keakar
Posted

yea I hadn't thought about how its supported but it cant have that much weight since they use plastic spacers for all of the lift kits for it

 

mine is the 2wd so to get 3" im going 2" drop shackle and removing the block making the u-bolts be 1 1/2" too long after, so I should get about a 3 1/4" drop in the rear

 

so since swapping the strut mount to he bottom is out, for the front I cant decide the best way to drop it, there are drop spindles and then there are drop strut bodies you reuse the stock hardware with and they both average $150-$175 in price. I want to leave stock unchanged as much as possible and do the simpler less intrusive mod to it which I think is the drop strut but it is also the most scary dealing with spring compression and trusting I can put it all back together right and safely

Personally I like drop spindles because they maintain your factory strut and suspension angles, therefore ride quality is unchanged
  • Like 1
Posted

Personally I like drop spindles because they maintain your factory strut and suspension angles, therefore ride quality is unchanged

 

thanks, im thinking just about all of them are roughly the same quality as its just a chunk of metal so paying extra for a big name brand isn't needed or am I wrong?

 

any brand recommendations to get or to stay away from

Posted

My strut has been under the control arm for 12,800 miles has been flawless. The dealership had my truck last week to do the free oil change, tire rotation and vehicle inspection and they said everything including all the suspension looked "great". I was just as reserved about the idea of mounting the strut under the control arm too, but it's has worked out fine for me. I couldn't imagine a company like Rough Country would put their business in jeopardy by selling a kit that wouldn't support the vehicle. If you plan to beat on the truck and abuse it then it may very well break, mine lives a good life, well used but not abused. I also used the factory U-bolts with the factory block removal. The nut is in NEW threads at that position and doesn't require a new set of U-bolts. I think where people run out of thread length is because they run one nut up too tight before getting the other nut in the same position. I ran mine up and snugged them to the point they were even and THEN tightened the nuts. I didn't run out of threads.

 

I check the front end and the rear end periodically myself and as I mentioned, I haven't had a single issue with the suspension.

Posted

I also prefer drop spindles, but when I lowered my 2014 there were no spindles available for it and was told the spindles for a 2013 would not work without being modified. That was a bummer because I have the adjustable BellTech 647SP kit I bought for my 2013 crew cab collecting dust in the shop. None of that kit would work on the 2014. Struts were different, spindles were different and the flip kit was different.

Posted

 

 

My strut has been under the control arm for 12,800 miles has been flawless. The dealership had my truck last week to do the free oil change, tire rotation and vehicle inspection and they said everything including all the suspension looked "great". I was just as reserved about the idea of mounting the strut under the control arm too, but it's has worked out fine for me. I couldn't imagine a company like Rough Country would put their business in jeopardy by selling a kit that wouldn't support the vehicle.

If you buy the kit it's one thing, but he was talking about just going and getting the bolts from the hardware store. Either way I'm still not entirely comfortable with the idea, just because if I pull the bolts out of my strut I could probably drive around the block with no issues. If you do that with the strut under the arm your not going anywhere. I'm sure there's plenty of people that will have no issues with it but it's not for me

Posted

 

thanks, im thinking just about all of them are roughly the same quality as its just a chunk of metal so paying extra for a big name brand isn't needed or am I wrong?

 

any brand recommendations to get or to stay away from

I don't have any personal experience with them since I have a 4wd but I did come across this in my research

comparison.gif

Posted

I used belltech on my last truck. Love it. I just bought a mcgaughys kit for my 14 so we will c. I don't think nu can go wrong between the 2

Posted (edited)

I don't have any personal experience with them since I have a 4wd but I did come across this in my research

comparison.gif

well that is a good point to make, I thought they all used the same basic patterns so im shocked to see some change geometry.

 

keeping the stock geometry is the whole point of using drop spindles in the first place, at least for me it is.

 

mcgaugheys isn't much more then the others out there at $283 and I don't trust those $150-$160 no name ones, because i think they might be made in china with sub par metal

 

as to the rough country under mount strut bolt design, its scary as hell. sure they are grade 9 bolts but the weight of the entire front end its on roughly an 1/8" thick nut outer ring so if the threads in the nut or bolt heads give way and let go, then you spear the strut into the ground and can have violent and completely out of control serious consequences from it beyond a totaled truck but maybe serious injury or worse.

 

to be honest I don't know how any liability insurance company would give them coverage selling that kit unless they included some sort of clam shaped cast irion metal cover that can hold that much weight in a failure scenario

Edited by keakar
Posted

im new to this page, i have a 2014 gmc sierra, reklez in pearland installed my 3/6 drop with mcgauhys everything. i have the slight vibration @ around 50 mph when excelerating hard. ive been reading about shimming the rear end or shortening the driveshaft about 1.5 inches. my question is, if i shim the rear diff where do i put the shims? can someone post a picture of two please. besides the vibration everything else is great. im also running 22" dub ballers with 284/45/22 with no rubbing in the front at all.

Posted

im new to this page, i have a 2014 gmc sierra, reklez in pearland installed my 3/6 drop with mcgauhys everything. i have the slight vibration @ around 50 mph when excelerating hard. ive been reading about shimming the rear end or shortening the driveshaft about 1.5 inches. my question is, if i shim the rear diff where do i put the shims? can someone post a picture of two please. besides the vibration everything else is great. im also running 22" dub ballers with 284/45/22 with no rubbing in the front at all.

0e5b02a55fdd130c28de5f4b80e11314.jpg

 

They go between the Axel housing and the leaf springs. I had to use 4° on my 13 CC. Will be lowering my 14 in another month or so

Posted (edited)

0e5b02a55fdd130c28de5f4b80e11314.jpg

 

They go between the Axel housing and the leaf springs. I had to use 4° on my 13 CC. Will be lowering my 14 in another month or so

 

 

can anyone confirm the shim size needed to be used for 2" drop shackles along with removing the stock 1.25" block over the axle?

 

mine will be done just as in the picture and I don't know the procedure to calculate the right measurements and I don't trust myself to do it correctly even if it was explained to me.

 

also please confirm this, from what I am seeing this picture shows the orientation as if it were for a lift kit so if im lowering the truck then the rear end turns down and not upwards so for a lowering kit the shim flips around in the other direction with the fat part end going on the rear side closest to the back bumper correct?

Edited by keakar
Posted

If I remember right, the higher upper ball joint mount allows the spindle to be used on a 4WD and 2WD truck and keeps the axle boot away from the upper ball joint at all angles. The McGaughys may require more of the ball joint shaft to be cut off below the ball joint nut. I've never ran McGaughys spindles, so maybe somebody with a 4WD could chime in. I have ran Belltech spindles on about 6 vehicles and with no issues at all with bumpsteer on everything from street driven trucks and cars to full on drag cars. It's when you combine the spindle with springs or struts for a lower drop that you can possibly run into bumpsteer headaches.

 

Just as information, the grade 9 hardware exceeds the factory bolt specs, which I "think" is grade 5, and the two grade 9 bolts holding the strut mount will exceed 1 ball joint nut holding the spindle. Mine has been flawless and I'm sure the company has many other trucks using the same set up. As I mentioned before, if it wasn't "safe" a company like Rough Country wouldn't put their business on the line for it. Can it be broken... sure if you abuse it. Some people including myself can break an anvil. It takes sense enough to know that you've lowered the truck and what the new limitations will be.

Posted

There is no one shim fits all, that's why pinion shims do not come with any kits on the market... tolerance stack ups in the frame will make each truck slightly different and some more pronounced than others. If I were you I'd buy some 2 degree shims and after you lower it see how it does. You may not need them. I ran into this on my 2013 crew cab most people with the exact same drop kit had no trouble and after much research is why I bought THAT kit, but mine was so far out of whack it was almost ridiculous. It also made me not want to lower this 2014 as much as I did my previous truck just to steer clear of issues on another brand new truck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,554 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...