Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Very interesting. About a year ago. Asked if anyone having the buffeting also had the roof rack cross bars installed and at least one person did, so the conclusion seemed to be the cross bars did not help. One thing we did not explore was the ax act position of them. It's totally possible that put in the correct location, they can be helpful in adding some stiffness to help resist the buffeting (assuming it's he roof making the noise, which is still the most likely situation).

 

Maybe I will pick up a set after all....

 

Except someone here a few/lot pages back saw no difference with them on or off, and I found the same as I had them removed at delivery ... I did not try them in the other positions

Posted

Very interesting. About a year ago. Asked if anyone having the buffeting also had the roof rack cross bars installed and at least one person did, so the conclusion seemed to be the cross bars did not help. One thing we did not explore was the ax act position of them. It's totally possible that put in the correct location, they can be helpful in adding some stiffness to help resist the buffeting (assuming it's he roof making the noise, which is still the most likely situation).

 

Maybe I will pick up a set after all....

Maybe they disrupt the airflow over the roof, which might help, but I don't think they would add any real stiffness. Mine rattled right from the dealer so I took them off and taped the ends before reassembling them. The rails are only held into the brackets by one screw (not fully tightened by dealership) and it is designed to slip on one side so if your roof were flexing I think the rails would as well.

 

But hey if that really does solve the problem GM has a cheap fix on their hands.

Posted

A member on the Cadillac Forums had the exterior roof crossbars installed to carry items, and says it all but eliminated his booming and buffeting.

 

 

Except someone here a few/lot pages back saw no difference with them on or off, and I found the same as I had them removed at delivery ... I did not try them in the other positions

I'm going off the comment about someone on the Cadillac forum having a reduction of the buffeting with the installation of the cross bars. I agree it's been discussed many times before and seemed to be of no help, but just wondering about the specific position as a way to explain this report of it helping.

Posted

Had a 2015 LTZ for a few months with approx 11k miles on it. Had the doming/buffeting noise. Have since traded in for the 2016 LTZ and have all the same exact problems as before. The dealership had their head service person take it for a drive and could not believe the issue still existed. Was told the one I traded in was still sitting in the service bay and probably would be for months as GM keeps sending them possible fixes with none working as of yet. The new one, lets just say they buried their heads on top of their desk in disbelief that the same problems were occurring. Waiting to hear whats next.

Posted (edited)

I went to a BBB arbitration Yesterday for my 2015i Escalade ESV. GM agreed to purchase the truck back before the arbitration, but wanted to charge me use mileage for 4800 miles. The truck has 6000 miles and it all started around 700-800 miles.

 

FYI...MAKE SURE WHEN YOUR SERVICE WRITER, WRITES YOUR REPAIR ORDER IT STATES "ROOF BUFFETING". We had several tickets wrote up with roof buffeting, but the last one was written up with "a drone in the car and it still exists". GM said now that is a whole different problem now... I told them its the same damn thing. They are trying to play on semantics....

 

The other thing that came up from GM...they stated in our warranty book that came with these vehicles it states that they are NOT responsible for noises in the truck. I will look for it and post the info for everyone. I will have a decision in 3 business days.

Edited by wiseasp
Posted (edited)

hi every one, i wanna share my experience from very far away >Saudi Arabia..

i have 2015 sle Yukon and the first day i Purchased it i notes the same issue y'll have (doming/buffeting noise) and( severe vibration )> i went back to the local dealer how understand nothing and complain about it he told me u need a new ties ,they change them for free under warranty but nothing change at all ,went back again he tray it but he told me its normal and he heard nothing he latterly pretend that he herd nothing and the hole car was checking but he insist . so i google that and fond this great site ( thank god) :-) , i read every thing here and try some things on my car and i found that the only thing that helps me a lot is

( reduce tiers presser ) its minimize the (doming/buffeting noise) and( severe vibration ) to 70% on mined keep in mind the road here are so bad,,,i took it done to 30 psi and i recommend it for u guys to give it a try ...

thanks guys and excuse my spelling >>>

Edited by Eric cova
  • Like 1
Posted

If it turns out to be only the tire pressure this would be crazy. I usually only ran 36psi on my olde denali. What pressure you guys running

Posted

If it turns out to be only the tire pressure this would be crazy. I usually only ran 36psi on my olde denali. What pressure you guys running

States 32 psi for all four on the door for my 20015 LTZ 6.2L cc. But, I set them at 30 psi cold. Now that the weather is warming noticed that I'm starting the day at about 31. Will be 32 by April. Anyway, the tiress are usually at 34 ~ 36 after a few miles. So, all is good. But, if you're starting out cold with 36psi, depending on speed driven and outside temp, could be at 40 ~ 42 psi very quickly. Tires juiced that high will transfer lots of road conditions into your veh for sure, regardless of the brand, make, model, etc.

Posted

Mine came delivered from dealer at 40psi cold. Didn't notice it until first trip when we found the highway expansion joints to be very annoying. Tires were reading 42psi when warm. Dropped it down to 33 cold and had noticeable improvement. Door jam sticker is 35psi for my 18" z71s.

Posted

Guys should try the lower pressure. Does make a big diff. Snoring bear you might be right about that psi. I had 23 inch rims on mine and psi was set lower than labeled on tire might of been 30psi. But I know I always dropped pressure lower and it rode better

Posted

I've been following this thread from the beginning and I think the tires contribute to the noise. I drove the suv's in all 3 groups (both sizes) over several months and experienced the same cabin pressure/noise. I didn't drive any 4x4 versions. My husband always insisted we test drive the ones with 22's. I finally found one without problems, so I drove it 300 miles before I bought it. This one had 20's. The sticker said equipped with 22's. We found out the dealer took the factory installed 22's off the Denali and replaced them with 20's. They're Continental CrossContact LX20 Eco+ 275/55/20. The tire pressure was 32-34 in the winter and is 34-35 now. I'm going to have air let out as it warms up.

We later found out the salesperson who took the 22's off my Denali regretted it, b/c it created the noise and pressure problems in his Denali.

I have a sunroof and built-in entertainment system. No noise problems in the cabin and my headliner doesn't move when I close the door.

I have a 2015i with 14,000 miles now. I bought it with 10 miles.

Posted

This one had 20's. The sticker said equipped with 22's. We found out the dealer took the factory installed 22's off the Denali and replaced them with 20's. They're Continental CrossContact LX20 Eco+ 275/55/20. We later found out the salesperson who took the 22's off my Denali regretted it, b/c it created the noise and pressure problems in his Denali.

 

I don’t know if the 20s are a fix for the noise and pressure, but if that’s what the salesperson thought, he should just change them back to the 20s and find out for sure. FWIW, I have the same tire with concave five spoke factory wheels and mine never had any noise or pressure.

Posted

Well, the OD's are the same for the 20 and 22 tires. So, no reprogramming is required when going back and forth. But, having had several GM vehicles over the past thirty years and had vehicles with both dimensions I have learned that 20's are the way to go whether talking ride, wear, cost, you name it.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

My new Denali will be in soon but:

Back from vacation and here are our experiences with 2 Suburbans and a Lincoln Navigator.

We rented a Suburban for a week down in Florida this past week with 2 bad experiences. The first Suburban with less than 5000 miles on it, we had to return to the rental company since the A/C stopped working in the Florida heat. The second suburban we had (15,000 miles on it) for only 2 days when it died at a stop light in 4 lanes of traffic. Started back up but the check engine light came on and when I went to accelerate it bucked and made a loud bang. I let off the gas and stepped back on it since traffic was flying by and it did the same thing, bucked with a loud bang. It was in reduced power mode and we limped a few miles down the highway and into a parking lot. Called the rental company and an hour later they provided a Lincoln Navigator.

 

After 4 Escalades and 3 Denalis with 4 Avalanches thrown in over the last 10 years or so the Lincoln Navigator was a real surprise! As soon as you get in the seats are plush, even the 3rd row seats according to the wife. We were fully loaded with 6 people and luggage and the V6 - twin turbo engine was sweet. Real impressed with the motor at how it performed fully loaded and running down the highway 75-80 mph.

The ride was nothing short of sensational. Smooth smooth smooth - no buffeting or booming - no pressure sensations - no hard/harsh ride, quiet ride all around with very little road noise. "Luxurious", "plush", quiet ride with plenty of power. I'm impressed for sure.

 

Back at airport for the return trip home we got back into my Denali and the comments were that we didn't realize how bad the ride was in this if we hadn't ridden in the Navigator.

 

After the new Denali arrives and depending on the ride we are considering the Navigator for our next vehicle.

 

Just like to add that the second Suburban suffered from booming, vibrations and buffeting from 62 to 70 mph. Anything below 62 or above 70 mph was just about perfect.

The first Suburban we did not get to drive it enough to experience any issues.

Edited by 16Denaliguy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,691 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...