Jump to content

MThompsonjr115 - 2014 GMC Sierra CCRB 4x4 5.3 SLT A


MThompsonjr115

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just ordered the Sierra Spec 35w 5000k HID kit from The RetroFit Source... they're having a huge sale. Only paid $130 for the kit, and $9 shipping.

 

Can't wait to hook these up.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Installed some cargo and backup LEDs tonight... they seem to be pretty bright. Here's a link to the LEDs: http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&alt=web&id=221398579566

 

From the back

f6c8654a5ce723eb113a83273de2cad6.jpg

 

View into unlit garage, just the LEDs lighting the garage

c69e2feab9ff997c092ffc2e8f93aa76.jpg

 

Still waiting on the HIDs to ship from TRS... can't wait!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Very nice, I used some 50W LEDs like those. Yours seem as bright as mine.

Posted

Very nice, I used some 50W LEDs like those. Yours seem as bright as mine.

I looked at the link for the lights you have, and they look identical but are 50w instead of 10w... interesting. I wonder if they actually are different outputs.

 

 

 

Diablosport Intune is on the way!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Got the Intune updated and loaded the Mileage Boost tune and the Firm Trans tune... seemed better just looking at the Instant MPG, but the trans shift points were very different after a short drive.

 

Decided to modify the stock TCM tune to add some firmness and remove torque management to replace the DiabloSport Firm TCM tune. We'll see what it's like tomorrow morning on the drive to work.

 

Throttle response seemed better too. It's really early to tell any real improvements but after I fill up tomorrow I'll have a good idea by the end of the week. Stay tuned!!!!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Got the Intune updated and loaded the Mileage Boost tune and the Firm Trans tune... seemed better just looking at the Instant MPG, but the trans shift points were very different after a short drive.

 

Decided to modify the stock TCM tune to add some firmness and remove torque management to replace the DiabloSport Firm TCM tune. We'll see what it's like tomorrow morning on the drive to work.

 

Throttle response seemed better too. It's really early to tell any real improvements but after I fill up tomorrow I'll have a good idea by the end of the week. Stay tuned!!!!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

*puns intended* (stay tuned!) lol.

 

But on a serious note,

 

The trans firm shift does change a lot! I have it set on the hard trans shift for WOT and you really feel that thing shift! I like it for when I go WOT and that's the times that you really notice a difference when you either have the hard or firm shift tuned.

 

Did you increase the throttle response? I have mine set to 20% more response. So much nicer. Just a heads up!

Posted

*puns intended* (stay tuned!) lol.

 

But on a serious note,

 

The trans firm shift does change a lot! I have it set on the hard trans shift for WOT and you really feel that thing shift! I like it for when I go WOT and that's the times that you really notice a difference when you either have the hard or firm shift tuned.

 

Did you increase the throttle response? I have mine set to 20% more response. So much nicer. Just a heads up!

Lol! Didn't even notice that.

 

How do you specify a tune for only WOT? I know you can modify parameters, but not sure how you pure a tune on just the WOT side.

 

I didn't touch the Throttle Boost, as I read from several people it messes with the smoothness and transmissions shifting characteristics.

 

Wasn't thrilled with the shift points on the Firm TCM tune, so I modified the stock tune to add 5% firmness to PT shifts and 10% to WOT shifts, took out TM as well.

 

I also wasn't thrilled about the raise in rev limit on the Mileage Boost tune, truck didn't sound very happy at 6k or whatever RPM. Not sure how to fix that.

 

I averaged 18.1MPG on the way to work this morning... traffic was slightly lighter than normal, but this is at least 1.5-3MPG better than normal.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

HIDs from TRS were delivered, but forgot to get some Butyl tape... looks like installation will have to wait. Also need to get a drill bit large enough to make a 3/4" hole.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

::UPDATE::

 

I filled up the truck after ~200 of driving with the DiabloSport Intune Mileage Booster tune and averaged 15.2MPG hand calculated. This is a nearly 2MPG improvement over the normal 13.5MPG I've been seeing with 80% city(stop/go traffic) and 20% highway driving. This is great! Can't wait to see what it does when the temps warm up and I put the Airaid back on.

 

I haven't tried the '87 Performance' or the "Diablo' tune yet... fuel is cheap so maybe I'll try the 'Diablo' tune sometime soon. I paid $2.569 for 87oct today.

 

HID's are awaiting installation... might do that this upcoming week.

 

NO sure I'll be doing much else to the truck for awhile due to funds being needed for my WRX and the wedding next year. I might level it in the spring, and I'd like to get some LEDs for the front. I've also been debating on getting some N-Fab side steps. I might also Plasti-Dip my wheels Gloss Black in the spring to find out if I like it or not.

Posted

82bb028190b32951d19b26e13b4d48e2.jpg

 

333488ff652671ab58f14967c9a4d903.jpg

 

0e01af13303673e8ba6339e5055894f8.jpg

 

Couple pics of the truck at the fuel station while it gets its first tank of E85($2.27/gal)... we'll see how it goes.

 

Cleaned it up today... used Chemical Guys products. Was with Citrus Wash and Gloss. Clay bar'd the whole truck. Put a coat of Glossworks glaze on followed by a coat of Jet Seal 109. Trying to get it protected before the hard winter hits.

 

Looks good under the LED's at Meijer.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

The All-terrain edition Sierras come with body colored bumpers, yours are both chrome. Either your truck is a fake AT, or you've had both of the bumpers replaced.

Well this is a nice way to say "good looking truck" lol. But your statement is false about it being a "fake AT" because you can order an AT with chrome bumpers from the factory. It's just that so few people now a days like chrome so you always see body colored bumpers

 

So this truck isn't a "fake AT" nor where the bumpers needed to be replaced.

Posted

The All-terrain edition Sierras come with body colored bumpers, yours are both chrome. Either your truck is a fake AT, or you've had both of the bumpers replaced.

Thank you for showing how little you know about these trucks.

 

There's a little package you can add on to the All-Terrain Plus package that deletes the painted bumpers and replaced them with chrome bumpers. Funny that I know that, and I didn't even order the truck, I bought it used. Some of us know things and some people run their mouths.

 

Well this is a nice way to say "good looking truck" lol. But your statement is false about it being a "fake AT" because you can order an AT with chrome bumpers from the factory. It's just that so few people now a days like chrome so you always see body colored bumpers

 

So this truck isn't a "fake AT" nor where the bumpers needed to be replaced.

Thanks Mike!

 

I would have preferred to get a truck with color matched bumpers, but the chrome has grown on me, especially with all the rock chips that occur on the highway. Chrome doesn't get chewed up nearly as bad.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Thank you for showing how little you know about these trucks.

 

There's a little package you can add on to the All-Terrain Plus package that deletes the painted bumpers and replaced them with chrome bumpers. Funny that I know that, and I didn't even order the truck, I bought it used. Some of us know things and some people run their mouths.

 

 

Thanks Mike!

 

I would have preferred to get a truck with color matched bumpers, but the chrome has grown on me, especially with all the rock chips that occur on the highway. Chrome doesn't get chewed up nearly as bad.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yea I have some rock chips on my paint on the front of my truck. I sometimes wonder what it would've been like with painted bumpers. Yea I could just get a clear bra but this way I know the chrome is a bit better against rocks.

 

Edit: I even found a rock chip in the chrome surround of my grille :P damn rocks on the highway

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...