Jump to content

Considering purchasing a 1996 GMC Yukon. Advice?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi there -

 

New to the forums, and was not sure where I could post this, so please go easy on me!

 

I'm considering purchasing a 1996 GMC Yukon. Body and interior are in decent shape, and the price is a near giveaway (under $1K).

 

The problem is that the car failed the NJ emissions inspection. The results are listed below:

 

Primary Emission Test Performed:OBD - FAIL
OBD SYSTEM - DIAGNOSTIC RESULTS
-Bulb Check: PASS
-OBD Connector: PASS
-MIL Command Status: FAIL
-Check Engine Light On: FAIL
-OBD Communications: PASS
-Overall Readiness Result: FAIL
OBD SYSTEM - READINESS STATUS
-Engine Misfire READY
-Catalytic Converters NOT READY
-A/C Refrigerant UNSUPPORTED
-Fuel System READY
-Heated Catalytic Converters UNSUPPORTED
-Oxygen Sensors NOT READY
-Comprehensive Component READY
-Evaporative System UNSUPPORTED
-Oxygen Sensors - Heaters READY
-Secondary Air Injection UNSUPPORTED
-EGR Systems NOT READY
OBD SYSTEM - DIAGNOSTIC TROUBLE CODES PRESENT:
-Total # of codes Present: 2
-Individual Codes Present: P0134, P0300
Secondary Emissions Test(s) Performed:
TEST RESULT:
Gas Cap PASS
Tampering PASS
Visible Smoke PASS
Liquid Leak PASS
Indicator Light FAIL
Misc. Emissions PASS
From the owner's ad:
"...It runs rough. It got a tune up (spark plugs, distributor cap and rotor) and it helped a lot but it still runs rough. I don't know why but it doesn't make any knocking or otherwise funny noises.
Just want to see what I should be looking at to make this truck legal to drive, and how much it'll cost. Heck, is it even worth purchasing?
Thanks,
Steve
Posted

Welcome aboard. I'm sorry I don't have any helpful ideas off hand, if you do a search for those codes you should come up with some ideas. However personally I'd take it to a good shop/dealer and have them take a look at it and give you an estimate of what is wrong rather than guessing and wasting your time and money.

Posted

1996 is the first year of the horrific Vortec 5000 & 5700 engine and it's a complete POS that lasted until 1999-2000. Constant fuel injection system problems from a piss poor CSFI poppet valve design and internal/external coolant leaks from a piss poor intake manifold design.

Posted

My 97 has 200k on the original engine and transmission. Runs GREAT. Yes it has had 1 intake manifold gasket in its life and 2 fuel pumps. I still have the mechanical SFI fuel injection. Works fine for me.

 

Some people upgrade to Multiport fuel injection.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=csfi+to+mpfi

 

If I drive 60 - 65 I can get 20 - 22mpg. City is more like 13 - 14. I would suggest you replace all 4 Oxygen (O2) sensors. The 2 sensors BEFORE the cats matter the most, as they tell the computer to adjust the fuel mixture. The 2 sensors AFTER the cats only function for emissions (tell you if your cats are working or need replaced).

 

After replacing all 4 of my O2 sensors, I gained 2 - 3 mpg. Bosch O2 sensors are inexpensive on www.rockauto.com compared to the local parts stores.

 

-Individual Codes Present:

 

P0134, - 02 Sensor Circuit No Activity Detected (Bank I Sensor 1)

 

P0300 - Random Misfire

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I am so glad MN got rid of the stupid emissions tests, while it was going it was a complete joke. Really, how many people are running around in 1977 Granada's?

 

I've got a 98 Yukon with the 5.7 and 203,000 rounds and yes it had the intake gasket issue which I replaced last winter. Other than that the thing runs flawlessly and I literally have not touched it other than routine maintenance since I bought it in 2000. I also purchased a 99 Tahoe my son drives that has just over 100,000 miles on it, sweetest running 350 I've encountered in quite some time.

 

Get the thing scanned for codes, you might have a bad MAP sensor and it's just running too rich. The MAP sensor on my 98 went bad and the light on the dash came on, the thing also lost what felt like about 50 HP and got sluggish when it happened. I put in a new MAP sensor and the difference was night and day. Could also be o2 sensors. Other than that I wouldn't be too afraid of these trucks, mine have taken a beating, run great, and keep coming back for more, there's a ton of them running around here yet!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Ok that confirms the extra quart theme they are still going with which must mean they have noted some initial use more so then some engines and probably the bigger factor in all of this probably isn't the engine so much as its the insane distance or OLM that lulls a lot of the driving public into driving their new vehicle off the lot and not even doing one short interval oil change because the manufacturer doesn't say different and if the dealer follows that logic as well. Selling the rarely needing to be serviced concept seems to go over well with the public that wants to get away with as little as possible for dollars spent on the vehicles maintenance and I bet there are 3.0 engines just like other vehicles out there that never have their oil checked by the owner which goes back to why they probably felt the need to add that extra quart to avoid a costly theme.    Speaking of cutting filters open, it was probably over two years ago now that a youtuber who buys vehicles to do longer term reviews and pulls a fifth wheel through the mountains of Colorado on summer trips and that becomes part of the testing. Anyway he had a GM HD with the 6.6 gas and a Ford 250 with the 7.3 gas at the same time and of no surprise the Ford had more power etc but somewhere along the way in the few thousand miles he put on the truck, he changed the oil and was seeing glitter and cut open the filter and yeah, things were not looking spectacular. The truck about that time or soon after seemed down on power compared to what it had been and then threw some engine code, I expect the cam/lifters were failing and so he brought the truck back to the dealer and made some deal to get out of it as he knew it would sit for months waiting on a new engine as they were so backlogged at the time. He kept the GM for some time after that using it exclusively until he sold it after buying his next vehicle to do a review on. Definitely the filter can tell a story when things are starting to go sideways, but it would be a sickening feeling to cut it open and be faced with an ugly mess like that and be running a magnet through the pleats and the oil on the dirty side of the filter and see all the fines sticking to the magnet.    The dealer may have some ideas based on experience as to where that coolant smell is coming from, I would imagine if they can't find it but its smelling they would put dye in it to they could give it a run cycle and use the black light to see where it pops up, if its a hose connection, water pump, rad or even a head gasket etc. 
    • Good looking truck, suspensionmaxx looks like a solid option
    • Thanks for the info, im considering a leveling kit or 4" lift kit.
    • charm.li (website) has the vehicle-specific diagnostic procedure for that code, you can use to find what the cause of it is.
    • It’s at the point of amusement. I’m retired I have time. It’s fun seeing people try to convince me I’m using oil. I’m buying oil at the prescribed time. It gets drained and new goes in. Do I add in between, no. My oil doesn’t even get dirty in 5k miles. I don’t even see any drop on the stick. I check in the same place. All is well.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...