Jump to content

Added keyless entry to work truck!


passat774

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

I was getting my oil changed at my local Chevy dealer and asked the parts department if they could look up a keyless entry option. I have a 2014 silverado 2wd work truck.

 

The parts manager looked up my truck by vin and determined that the Tpms module was the same as the keyless entry module. He determined that part number

13577771 should work. He then had a lead tech give it a try and he had it programmed in minutes! List on the part is 73.69.

 

I hope this helped all the guys like my who have company trucks without keyless!

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I am looking to get this done! I already have a brand new key fob, but was told I do not have the right RPO codes or whatever. Can it still be done? There has to be a way to make it work!

  • 5 months later...
Posted

Passat774, do you know if you have WT1 or WT2? Also, what dealership helped you with this?

Posted

I am a 12v installer and have done this on several work trucks while installing remote starters. Another option if dealership pricing is too expensive or if you wanted to add a remote starter at the same time.

 

Benefits of going aftermarket vs oem is better range, 2way notification if someone is trying to break in, etc.

Posted

I am a 12v installer and have done this on several work trucks while installing remote starters. Another option if dealership pricing is too expensive or if you wanted to add a remote starter at the same time.

 

Benefits of going aftermarket vs oem is better range, 2way notification if someone is trying to break in, etc.

Yeah... But it usually ends up being a hack job!

 

RT

Posted

Yeah... But it usually ends up being a hack job!

 

RT

 

Cant argue with that, ive seen alot of bad install jobs in my time. You gotta find a reputable shop with installers that enjoy their jobs.

 

Keep in mind that even gm certified techs are also capable of doing this as well. My cousin had his headlight tsb done and i checked over their work. The tech didnt remove the air box, ripped the headlight guard to get to the bulb, didnt reinstall the bulb cover, didnt even lock the headlight bulb into place bc he couldnt get his fat hand past the air box lol

Posted

I talked to Mac Haik Chevrolet in Houston. The looked up my VIN and said it could be done for $150. I will report after they do it.

  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...