Jump to content

Diesel Regeneration


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
Just now, KARNUT said:


Brilliant


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There is nothing wrong with occasionally driving the new diesels. I do it, and have no issues. To say you can only daily drive these trucks is complete BS.... 

Posted
There is nothing wrong with occasionally driving the new diesels. I do it, and have no issues. To say you can only daily drive these trucks is complete BS.... 

I think you have it backwards. Short daily trips in a diesel aren’t good for them with regen. They are best suited for pulling, hauling and long runs. If you want to make grocery runs with one that’s fine, it’s your money. I’m experienced with diesels and don’t daily drive them anymore. We still use them for heavy duty work and with our service trucks. We switch to gas for our run around trucks, we weren’t getting good service out of diesels unless we worked them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I understand what your saying and agree with you comments partially. Diesels are cold blooded by nature and take longer to warm up. I was responding to the comment that these newer diesels are not meant to be driven occasionally (or thts what I understood)... cheers

Posted

The DPF doesn't do well with short drives.  You need to get the thing on the highway and drive it hard when it goes into regent to get the sucker clean. 

Posted

Lots more soot generated by the  motor when doing short tripping with a diesel.  The DPF loads up more frequently and has to burn it off more often.  A DPF has a limited number of regen cycles before it needs replaced or machine cleaned.  When a diesel is cold started, it has to use more EGR until the exhaust and the DEF get warmed up so that it will vaporize when injected into the SCR unit.  Increased EGR leads to increased soot loading.  

 

Those of us in commercial trucking have oodles of experience with these things and know the best methodologies to limit problems.  Until GM (and other U.S. OEM's) get their head out of their back side and move over to a far better SCR system that Amminex has had for quite some time, we will have to deal with this nonsense.

 

Amminex's system is a cartridge with 100% urea in a substrate.  The urea comes out of the cartridge as a gas and goes into the SCR unit.  No injector or filter required like with DEF.  100% on demand even cold starting in sub-zero weather. It eliminates the need for EGR on a diesel motor. And it is more efficient and results on lower NOx rates than DEF/SCR/EGR setups on U.S. motors.   The cartridge can be sized to the vehicle so that a cartridge will last for one oil change cycle.  When one changes the oil, change out the urea cartridge and hook up another and you are good for another oil change.   No DEF nonsense to spill, crystallize, clog the SCR injector, etc.  Pull one cartridge out, replace with another, and recycle the old cartridge.   No mess, simple as hooking up a propane tank on grill, no spillage.  

 

This isn't theory.  It has been in use for some time in Europe.  Navistar (International Trucks) bought a 50% stake in Amminex a few years back. Not sure why they haven't brought the technology over here yet.  In all studies, it beats the EPA limits on NOx by a comfortable margin.  But getting OEM's to do the right thing has always been a problem.

 

Scroll down the page on this link and watch the video.

http://www.amminex.com/home.aspx

 

The diesel car and pickup page....

http://www.amminex.com/oem/oem-passenger-cars.aspx

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 7/19/2015 at 2:55 PM, redwngr said:

GM intended that the regen process not be noticed by the operator, hence no indicator.

 

The exhaust tone is slightly different. Idle speed will be slightly higher.

 

Regen can be interupted on a dmax. Mine used primarily as a daily driver with 4 to 15 miles trips. Often the truck would be in regen for several trips, and sometimes over more than one day.

 

If the engine is unable to complete the regen after sufficient number of tries, it will put out a message to 'continue driving'. About 100,000 miles of dpf equipped dmax driving and I've never had the message come up. (I believe that the decision to put out the 'continue driving' message is actually based the calculated soot level continuing to rise when it has been trying to regen).

 

Life became simpler once I learned to just ignore the regen's and let the truck take care of itself.

 

No smoke, no diesel exhaust smell and I was happy with the fuel economy.

Thank you, if your information is correct, then you answered my question I've been searching for.  Was wondering why I started getting that "message"   my driving habits changed and I guess the regen wasn't able to finish since I live 1/2 mile from my main place of employment.  Back to normal driving soon.   Thx for the info from 2015 :)

Posted

When that message pops climb on the highway for 20 miles at 65mph,then turnaround and comeback home.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,924
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    KirbyCo
    Newest Member
    KirbyCo
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,446 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I will be doing that for sure, but I need to solve who has/ where I can find a bidirectional scan tool that will support OBD 1.5. I'm kicking myself because I ebay'ed a Snap On MT2500 that I didn't think I'd ever need anymore. D'oh!! I'd rather not buy another, so I'll contact a few local shops to see if they have one and how much they'd want to do the procedure. I'd rather have the ability to do it myself... I wish there was a modern tool that could do it all, but I'd have no idea what to buy.   The theory with the pulled timing is that it mimics a rich condition. The delayed spark causes incomplete burn and the O2 sensor picks up low oxygen levels. That's interpreted as a rich condition so the PCM pulls fuel and that shows up in the deeply negative fuel trims.
    • An ultra wealthy man had the most beautiful daughter. But, there was a problem. Everything she touched would melt in her hands. No matter what, Metal, Wood, Stone. Anything she touched would melt. She could not feed herself. Because of this, men were afraid of her. Nobody would dare marry her. Her father was despaired. What could he do to help his daughter? He consulted doctors, scientists and anybody who could solve this problem. Finally one of them said, "If your daughter touches one thing that does not melt in her hands, she will be cured." He was overjoyed and came up with a plan. The next day, he held a competition. Any man who could bring his daughter an object that would not melt in her hands would be given billions of dollars to marry her. Three extremely intelligent and handsome young men took up the challenge. The first brought a very heavy steel rod, But alas, when the she touched it, it completely melted in a matter of seconds. He sadly went away. The second brought a beautiful diamond, knowing diamonds were one of the hardest substance in the world and would not melt. But alas, once she held it in her hand, it melted. He too was sent away disappointed. So now, there was one left He was very nervous & sweating. He approached the daughter & said, “put your hand in my pants pocket and feel what is in there." She did exactly what he asked. She felt something very hard. She held it in her hand, squeezing it as hard as she could. It did not melt & remained extremely hard. Her father was overjoyed. Everybody was overjoyed. She was finally cured. Nothing never, ever melted in her hand again. They married and they both lived happily ever after, raising a wonderful family. Question: What was in the the groom’s pants pocket??? Answer below ↓ M&Ms of course! They melt in your mouth, not in your hand. What on earth were you thinking?
    • There's a bunch of tea leaves that you've read, but in any case the delayed timing is unusual. Not sure how that relates to the rich at idle vs. 'normal' while driving.   If you're in this deep, might be worth investigating, and re-learning the sensor. What have you got to lose? Plus, it properly fixes the timing cover leak.
    • The only problem I have seen this cause is longer crank times. 
    • Injector is being sent off today for rebuild and I estimate I'll have it back in 10 days or so.   It may not be the injector...of course...now that I've torn down the intake again. But, let's rule out the injector and replace those spider legs that have been almost rubbed through.   The truck has always had negative timing and I'm reading "normal" timing at warm idle should be +16 or so. I'm negative 16 to 25 or more, and it's always been like that since I bought it.   A light turned on upstairs last night in the old noggin. Rare, I know...   This will be wild, if it turns out to be the cause!   In 2001, according to the old service documentation, the muffler was replaced. Why? I have no idea, it wouldn't have been rusted through by then. But they did a crappy job.   In 2019, another shop replaced it and noted the prior install was poorly done on the work order. "Exhaust system vibrates on crossmember". Except...I guess they just left it be? I believe the husband, the couple who were original owners, had passed by then. Maybe she said it's just not worth it to have the exhaust system fixed and declined repairs. Very few miles were driven between 2019 and 2025.   The exhaust system vibrates heavily on the crossmember and you can feel it and REALLY hear it, even today. Not always, but at idle, it gets going pretty good sometimes.   What if....   ....What if that's enough to trigger one or both of the knock sensors? Could it be tricking the sensors into sensing knock, so it's pulling timing aggressively? Pulling timing heavily means it's firing after the piston reaches full height which means incomplete burn which means the O2 sensor is sensing a rich condition, which means I've been chasing my tail, and what I thought was an inconsequential problem (janky exhaust) has been THE issue for this truck for 25 solid years?   That would be wild. Maybe it IS wild.   The service documentation thereafter, for years, shows visits for rough idle, replacing O2's, replacing the cat, replacing plugs and wires, a misfire condition, like they could never solve the issue. The injector has been replaced 4 times in 80k miles, that's just crazy.   The secondary theory....   The engine has clearly had a leak at the front seal for a very long time (the greasy trench...). I think the truck changed hands quickly ~2025 because there's Napa receipts from someone I don't recognize in the ownership history. They apparently replaced the timing cover seal, and they did a terrible job. There's RTV smeared all over and the leak I had reduced to a weep by snugging the front oil pan bolts is now a leak again.   HOWEVER....I read about replacing the crankshaft position sensor. Any time the ckp sensor is disturbed or timing cover is removed, the truck requires relearning, and that can only be done through a bi-directional scan tool. Skippy with the RTV probably didn't do the relearn procedure is my guess. His scan tool is lost in a pile of RTV goo somewhere.   So, it's very possible the sensor has been disturbed and the truck is just running on the old learn data but not setting a code for anything. The distributor has since been replaced and so has the camshaft position sensor, so all bets are off for that thing.   In the theme of one step forward, two steps back, I returned the accumulator for the AC. The gal I've been working with at O'Really's has been great. She refunded it under manufacturer's defect and we compared it to the replacement I ordered, and sure enough, the replacement is machined very differently (and a gauge actually fits on it!).   Got it home, installed it, started vacuuming it down.... and I couldn't get good vacuum.   The high side service port, where I replaced the old GM ball valve suspecting that was a source of the previous leak....well, I've clearly exposed whatever pre-existing crack in the line where the service port is welded, and made it much worse. Blessing in disguise? Except there goes another $25, now I'm waiting for a replacement AC line.   In 10-ish days ALL the parts will be here. Rebuilt injector, new exhaust system, new cat, new high pressure AC line.   Oh, did I mention the squeaking ISN'T coming from the AC pump? The truck still squeaks when started, and there were words after I started it with the new AC pump installed. But, there was more to replacing the AC pump for just a squeak. A truck with good working AC is something of value, for the comfort alone.   I've ordered a new harmonic balancer because, 30 years is a good run for one of those. Rule it out. The squeak may be something more sinister, though. I'm worried about that ckp sensor and if it was shimmed correctly, or if the timing set was installed correctly. The squeak may be coming from UNDER the timing cover.   At this point, once I get it put back together, I'm thinking I'll take a 50 mile victory lap and then promptly put it up for sale. This truck is cursed. Betty, from beyond the grave, doesn't want anyone messing with her Blazer. Or maybe she's getting revenge for 30 years of shop visits with that thing.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...