Jump to content

CAI Oiled or Non-Oiled?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I plan on putting in a CAI on my 6.2 next week and I know I'm buying a aFe air intake but I'm stuck in between oiled or non oiled, what do you guys recommend?

Posted

I've run both and prefer the easier dry filter. I think the wet ones are better suited to vehicles that see more dusty roads, as you can regulate the amount of oil used.

Posted

I also read that the the Non-oiled also restricts more than the oiled? But I'd imagine that a non-oiled or any proper CAI would provide more airflow than the factory system.

Posted

dry filter for me. too much oil and you can screw up your mass air sensor.

Posted

I would recommend Airaid JR Kit with Dry Filter or just an M.I.T It does just as good if for half the cost of CAI on a stock engine. Neither one makes any huge power gains but Engine seems breath a little easier and improve throttle response. Oiled filters as Tek mentioned are recommended for dusty areas and Hi Performace applications.

post-145950-0-10806000-1451006037_thumb.jpg

post-145950-0-10806000-1451006037_thumb.jpg

post-145950-0-10806000-1451006037_thumb.jpg

post-145950-0-10806000-1451006037_thumb.jpg

Posted

Yeah I decided to buy the aFe Magnum Force Dry, just curious a cold air wouldn't void my warranty? I don't plan on doing a computer tune or anything like that.

Posted

I did the airaid junior with the dry filter on my 6.2. It's there for the purpose of a cleanable air filter, intake sound and the fact I could toss that batwing silencer in the trash bin.

Posted

Air inductions and exhaust do not affect warranty per the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act. Motor mods do.

 

You may want to do some more reading on CAI's before you buy the Magnum Force.

There was a Silverado dyno comparison tests done on various CAI's, and the Airaid MIT or Airaid Jr. Kit with stock air box did well.

Posted

See the thing is I live in California so CAI selections are kind of limited for me. Also I had aFe products on other vehicles I've had so i have trust in the brand, also the magnum system only ran 250$

Posted

I would recommend Airaid JR Kit with Dry Filter or just an M.I.T It does just as good if for half the cost of CAI on a stock engine. Neither one makes any huge power gains but Engine seems breath a little easier and improve throttle response. Oiled filters as Tek mentioned are recommended for dusty areas and Hi Performace applications.

unnamedairaid.jpg

Smart man!

 

Ac-Delco filter will out flow AND out filter 99.9% of the filters on the market and the stock airbox can handle about 150% of the air that the motor can suck in.

 

In another words the stock air box flows more air then the motor can use and the stock filter can pull more air then the motor use...

 

 

I love the Airaid intake tube as I like the sound and throttle response, also like cleaning up the engine compartment, that LS series motor is a great looking motor, just needs a intake tube to get rid of the hideous air tube.

Posted

Smart man!

 

Ac-Delco filter will out flow AND out filter 99.9% of the filters on the market and the stock airbox can handle about 150% of the air that the motor can suck in.

 

In another words the stock air box flows more air then the motor can use and the stock filter can pull more air then the motor use...

 

 

I love the Airaid intake tube as I like the sound and throttle response, also like cleaning up the engine compartment, that LS series motor is a great looking motor, just needs a intake tube to get rid of the hideous air tube.

Previously owned 2013 W/T had HD Air Box and could tell an improvement just by installing Purolator HD Filter.
Posted

IMO.

There are some upgrades that are worth it, some that don't make a difference, and some that are a complete waste of money and may harm your engine.

 

On a stock engine, the factory intake filter element flows more than enough air, and power is basically unaffected by any intake modifications.

 

Introducing a high flow filter has its trade offs. Take a K&N, put it up to the sun and look through it. Open holes that let in dust and dirt.

Maybe some after markets "might" flow better, but none filter as well as stock.

If you want to kill off your engine tolerances and gain nothing, run an aftermarket high flow filter. There isn't enough cubic inches, cam lift or head flow in these engines where any increase in available air will make a performance difference.

 

I'm sure I'll get flamed a little by those who want to believe that their vehicle somehow runs better, but the fact remains that the more unusable flow you might add, the less protection your engine will get. Either way, you will get absolutely nothing different in performance or gains at the pump, unless a little more growl does something for you.

Posted

Well, changed my mind. Decided to go with the Volant system instead, Prefered to keep the top closed. Ran 240$

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My post above is the direct reason for my outsized interest in keeping what I have for as long as possible. My memory isn't as short as some. 
    • I don't think so. 😏 Cars? Our experience will diverge there as well. I was buying cars with 200K (1970's) when I started and quite a few were pretty solid cars. (My early stuff was 1964 to 1968)  Some stinkers but not the dismal picture painted above. Now that said, yes, a dealer wouldn't talk to you if your car had more than 60K on the clock and lot cars were 60K or less except the back row where 100-120K was the auction bought for dirt for us poor losers. Kids in my county were not allowed to wear long pants if they couldn't rebuild and repair every part of that beast.    I will agree that many parts are now better. Alternators and charging systems are an envy. But I replaced few water pumps or power steering pumps then. Rebuilt carburetors but replaced few. Mufflers are another place of OEM improvement. Stainless? We didn't have no stink'n stainless.    As long as humans are in charge of governance this $$$$ situation will not improve.    The purchasing power of a dollar in 1955 is significantly higher than in 2025, meaning that a dollar could buy more goods and services in 1955 compared to 2025 due to inflation over the years. For example, what you could buy for $1 in 1955 would require approximately $10.50 in 2025.  Calculator.net inflationtool.com   Comparison of Purchasing Power: 1955 vs 2025 The purchasing power of a dollar has changed significantly from 1955 to 2025 due to inflation. Below is a breakdown of how much more money is needed in 2025 to match the buying power of a dollar in 1955. Purchasing Power Overview Year Equivalent Value of $1 in 1955 1955 $1.00 2025 $10.50 Key Points Inflation Impact: The value of money decreases over time due to inflation, meaning that the same amount of money buys fewer goods and services in the future. Example of Inflation: What could be purchased for $1 in 1955 would require approximately $10.50 in 2025. This illustrates how inflation has eroded the purchasing power of the dollar over the decades. Understanding these changes in purchasing power is crucial for financial planning and assessing economic conditions over time.  Wikipedia Calculator.net
    • The thermometer has been in my wife's 2008 envoy, my sons 2016 chevy, my friends 2020 1500 silverado all showing cooler readings. It's not the guage.
    • Have a question concerning trim levels. Ive not bought a new vehicle since 2006, and I have decided on a 2500 gmc pro or silverado custom. For anyone that has one of these 2 trim levels have you regretted not stepping up to the LT or SLE. I look at things as the more electronics the more problems to arise. I love the look of the old school gauges on the dash as well. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. 
    • If that guage has a way to adjust [hex on bottom], put that thing in a glass full of ice, put water in, put your gage in, let it sit for 3 minutes or so, and set it to 33 degrees.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...