Jump to content

Maneuverability of gooseneck vs bumper pull?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Contemplating getting a gooseneck or bumper pull I will be puling an old Classic car of about 20 feet length and 6000 pounds. The Bumper ull would be 26-28 feet long and the gooseneck would have the same floor space with an overhang of about eight feet. I will be pulling with a Sierra 3500 Diesel Dually..

 

Assuming I practice and learn, which would be the easiest parking and towing?

Posted

gooseneck turns tighter and so forth. for a classic car idk why you would need a 25 foot long one unless you are counting the hitch area. your series 75 is only 19 feet long so it would fit a on a 18 foot trailer no problem. 16 and 18 are the most common trailer sizes. when you get longer than that its usually a bit more money. I have had a car that was over 18 foot long on my 16 foot trailer. the wheel base is what matters.

Posted

I would say to go with a gooseneck. Are you looking at an enclosed or open trailer? An open trailer is a little harder to back due to the fact you may not be able to see it all the time, unless it has the car or something else on it. You can always see an enclosed trailer. You will need to learn to watch cab corners with a gooseneck, turning tight while backing up you can sometimes get the back of the cab into a trailer. Just my $00.02!! :jester:

Posted

Gooseneck is better, Way better. Not only can you turn/backup sharper , but your truck will ride better and be safer with a gooseneck.

 

Goosenecks don't get stolen as often either.

 

That said; I don't know why you would need such a heavy or long trailer for hauling a car. . You may want to save some cash on the trailer and spend it on your classic.

Posted

you can buy a bumper pull 18 foot for 2k. the same in gooseneck would be 4k and you would have to add the hitch few hundred more there too. just food for thought. gooseneck is better but its not like the bumper pull is a big problem.

Posted

Gooseneck is the trailer to go with if you want to compare for pulling purposes. The bumper pull can be more responsive as for backing up into certain spots compared to the gooseneck but in my opinion the gooseneck benefits out weigh the bumper pull.

Posted

gooseneck turns tighter and so forth. for a classic car idk why you would need a 25 foot long one unless you are counting the hitch area. your series 75 is only 19 feet long so it would fit a on a 18 foot trailer no problem. 16 and 18 are the most common trailer sizes. when you get longer than that its usually a bit more money. I have had a car that was over 18 foot long on my 16 foot trailer. the wheel base is what mattersThanks for the

Thanks for the reply. My Series 75 is 20.6 long (Limo). My 1958 Sixty Special Custom is 165" wheelbase. (13.5') and 257" / 21.5 feet long. I think it will fit on an 18 foot trailer with a tad of overhang and you are right. There are a lot more 18 footers out there. I may get one, but right now I am looking for an enclosed trailer and I think that including tiedowns, I will need at least 26-28 feet floor space. This would be a gooseneck with a 26' floor and an eight foot overhang. I have an eight foot bed on my truck.

post-150413-0-24863100-1453376628_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-24863100-1453376628_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-24863100-1453376628_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-24863100-1453376628_thumb.jpg

Posted

Gooseneck is better, Way better. Not only can you turn/backup sharper , but your truck will ride better and be safer with a gooseneck.

 

Goosenecks don't get stolen as often either.

 

That said; I don't know why you would need such a heavy or long trailer for hauling a car. . You may want to save some cash on the trailer and spend it on your classic.

 

I am pretty much settling for a gooseneck. Since my longest car is over 21 feet long I was thinking a 28 foot bed to give room for getting in front to tie down, And I might carry a 500 pound motorcycle in front of the car. My cars can weigh up to 5700 pounds, empty. Curb weight with gas could add couple of hundred pounds more, so I would be looking at a possible weight of 6500 pounds plus. Depending on trailer weight I think I should get triple 5200lb axles or tandem 7k.

 

I have scrimped and saved all my life. Want to buy a really nice, quality trailer. Thinking a used Featherlite or ATC.. Time to really enjoy retirement.

Posted

With my experience with campers the goose neck will pull better and be easier to back into tighter places. The bumper pull will be a little cheaper and if you don't have to maneuver into tighter spaces might be the way to go.

Posted

No experience with gooseneck towing but from the physics of it I'd go gooseneck. More stable and easier on the truck since the tongue weight is in the bed instead of your back bumper.

Posted

Gooseneck. Wins. Looking for one.

Posted

https://www.prolinetrailersales.com/enclosed-trailers/enclosed-gooseneck-trailers/8-5x32-enclosed-gooseneck-trailer

 

my brother in law had one of these for his a late model. one thing I will add is to think about enclosed if its wide its a hassle and may not fit. and you will need a winch cause you cant really get in and out of them when they are in the trailer. roll the window when loading it. I like a open trailer cause I have had some vehs that just wouldn't fit in a enclosed.

Posted

https://www.prolinetrailersales.com/enclosed-trailers/enclosed-gooseneck-trailers/8-5x32-enclosed-gooseneck-trailer

 

my brother in law had one of these for his a late model. one thing I will add is to think about enclosed if its wide its a hassle and may not fit. and you will need a winch cause you cant really get in and out of them when they are in the trailer. roll the window when loading it. I like a open trailer cause I have had some vehs that just wouldn't fit in a enclosed.

 

I thank you very much or going to the trouble to post a link. Trailer looks quite good. However I did just buy a used Featherlite in excellent condition. It is a 36 foot gooseneck aluminum. Weighs about 4,000 lbs and has two 7k axles. Hydraulic landing gear. double extension ramp that is about 12 feet overall giving me a long, low ramp that will clear my long, low cars. It also has a winch to pull the car in and out. I think it will do very well.

 

The gooseneck does handle quite well, but a lot differently than a bumper pull when making turns on roads t . You must swing wide or chance hitting the curb. The gooseneck wheels are mounted further back than a BP and this does make quite a difference.

 

Pulled it home - maiden voyage for me - I was amazed at the stability on the expressway! I normally cruise at 60-65 and get the best mileage with a trailer, I run faster unloaded. I had to watch my speed, because on the long boring stretches I was getting up to 80 mph without noticing it. So I set the speed control at 65 and came on home. No incidents.

post-150413-0-41705300-1453762140_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-73819800-1453762146_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-19522900-1453762151_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-84262700-1453762153_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-41705300-1453762140_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-73819800-1453762146_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-19522900-1453762151_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-84262700-1453762153_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-41705300-1453762140_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-73819800-1453762146_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-19522900-1453762151_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-84262700-1453762153_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-41705300-1453762140_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-73819800-1453762146_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-19522900-1453762151_thumb.jpg

post-150413-0-84262700-1453762153_thumb.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
    • We appreciate you sharing your experience with your truck. To ensure we get you the proper assistance, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
    • PCM?  These don't have a "PCM".  Powertrain Control Module.  They have an ECM (Engine Control Module) and TCM (Transmission Control Module).   Do you mean update the radio?     You can check what version you have in the settings page.  Should be Y181 but there might be a newer build they can update it to.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...