Jump to content

2015 Silverado Apparently can't Tow a Camper!

volrus

By volrus
in Troubleshooting & Recalls

Recommended Posts

volrus Enthusiast

volrus

Posted
Posted

Well, I've been a happy owner for 11 months and 21k miles, but no longer. Started on our family vacation with our camper in tow (6100 dry weight, 7600 loaded) and made it two hours into the 7 hour trip before my AC went completely out. Made the remainder of the trip with the windows down on mostly interstate and 3 kids....not fun. Finally make it to our destination, unhook, and spend the night.

 

Get up this morning to run to the store and the truck starts shaking violently, throws the flashing check engine light and a solid traction control light. No idea what's going on (other than an apparent misfire issue and a blown AC), but now I have to take my truck to the dealer while on family vacation and hope it can be fixed by the time we leave in 5 days...then hope we don't get left stranded on the way back. Probably going to have to get a rental car as well, although I'm hoping for a loaner. What kills me is I bought the truck primarily as a tow vehicle for a camper!

GsBowtie Enthusiast

GsBowtie

Posted
Posted

Sorry for your troubles, but it's a mechanical item. Things can happen. I've pulled my 6,000 travel trailer with my Silverado several times now without issue. One trip was over 2hrs away and I had to go up into the mountains to get to the campground.

 

At least it's still under warranty and can be fixed. Good luck. Let us know what the problem ends up being

GMCustomerService Senior Enthusiast

GMCustomerService

Posted
Posted

Well, I've been a happy owner for 11 months and 21k miles, but no longer. Started on our family vacation with our camper in tow (6100 dry weight, 7600 loaded) and made it two hours into the 7 hour trip before my AC went completely out. Made the remainder of the trip with the windows down on mostly interstate and 3 kids....not fun. Finally make it to our destination, unhook, and spend the night.

 

Get up this morning to run to the store and the truck starts shaking violently, throws the flashing check engine light and a solid traction control light. No idea what's going on (other than an apparent misfire issue and a blown AC), but now I have to take my truck to the dealer while on family vacation and hope it can be fixed by the time we leave in 5 days...then hope we don't get left stranded on the way back. Probably going to have to get a rental car as well, although I'm hoping for a loaner. What kills me is I bought the truck primarily as a tow vehicle for a camper!

 

Good morning volrus,

 

I am sorry to hear you are experiencing these concerns with your Silverado. I apologize for any inconvenience this has cause and hope it has not spoiled your family vacation. Has the dealer been able to diagnose your truck yet? I can reach out to them on your behalf to see if there are any updates on your vehicle.

 

Best,

Julianne M.

GM Customer Care

tnchevy Senior Enthusiast

tnchevy

Posted
Posted

Crap happens and it happened to you. Plenty of people towing with their trucks on here and no problems. Could have easily happened with another brand of truck.

f8l vnm Senior Enthusiast

f8l vnm

Posted
Posted

Sorry about your bad fortunes mate. Good luck. Was is the closest dealer to you ? If it doesn't start they can tow it

volrus Enthusiast

volrus

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks Julianne. Unfortunately it doesn't sound like a diagnosis has been made today. They figured out the AC issue, but sounds like they have no idea on the engine other than "we think it's an internal issue". They said they are looking into it, but don't want to take the engine apart in fear of me not being able to drive it back when we leave on Friday. He was thinking if they could get it drive able then I could take it to my local dealer I guess. I explained that it basically has to be fixed because it has tow my camper back home 7 hours. He didn't sound very reassuring. The dealer is Preston Hood in Fort Walton Beach, FL.

volrus Enthusiast

volrus

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Another update. Header has to be taken off to get to the problem. They said it might be a lifter. Have to admit, I'm pretty disappointed. However, it sounds like they will have it done on Thursday.

GsBowtie Enthusiast

GsBowtie

Posted
Posted

If it's just a lifter then you should be OK. That seems to be pretty rare on these new engines. Hope they can get it 100% for the trip home for you

volrus Enthusiast

volrus

Posted
  • Author
Posted

In all seriousness, did I push the truck too hard? It just makes me sick to think they are ripping my engine apart after only 21,000 miles.

TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted

No you didn't push it too hard, this is a truck that has sold over 1,000,000 trucks of since the new body style came out in 2014. Parts failures happen, that is why there are 5yr/100k or 5yr/60k mile warranties on them.

Beer Belly Enthusiast

Beer Belly

Posted
Posted

In all seriousness, did I push the truck too hard? It just makes me sick to think they are ripping my engine apart after only 21,000 miles.

don't feel bad...my '13 Silverado was at 16k when it started knocking, by 18k they had the engine in pieces on the floor.....replaced the #8 Piston, and it was fine for another 8k, then started to knock again....truck went bye bye after that....just luck of the draw

volrus Enthusiast

volrus

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Verdict is in. The AFM lifter broke. It's being put back together now. I hope this is the last broken lifter!

volrus Enthusiast

volrus

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thought I would give another update. Turns out the lifter wasn't broke, it was just stuck. The solution was to replace the lifters in the left bank. I assume getting stuck is better than breaking?

 

Also, the AC hose actually split thus causing all the freon to leak out. They said it's a fairly common issue because GM tends to put them on too tight in the factory.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 452 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...