Jump to content

5.3 cat delete

Jackrichardson13
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jackrichardson13 New Member

Jackrichardson13

Posted
Posted

I have a 2005 5.3. I have recently been getting the code that my cat is going bad. I could either take them off and bypass the o2 sensors or replace the cat witch would cost more money. I am trying to maximize my fuel economy. I am running a 2.5 inch lift with 33 a/t. I am currently getting 13. I don't have a cold air intake or programmer.

anumber1 Enthusiast

anumber1

Posted
Posted (edited)

Could be the o2 sensor after the cat is bad.

 

If you are dead set on removing the cats, your are gonna have the light on anyway unless you get a custom tune.

 

If the truck is your driver, not just a mud toy, fix it and keep the cats.

 

More than likely, all 4 o2 sensors could be tired/lazy.

 

Fuel economy? 33" tires and a lift?

 

Funny stuff...

Edited by anumber1
Jackrichardson13 New Member

Jackrichardson13

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Could be the o2 sensor after the cat is bad.

If you are dead set on removing the cats, your are gonna have the light on anyway unless you get a custom tune.

If the truck is your driver, not just a mud toy, fix it and keep the cats.

More than likely, all 4 o2 sensors could be tired/lazy.

Fuel economy? 33" tires and a lift?

Funny stuff...

To replace all four o2 sensors it would be about 400$.
anumber1 Enthusiast

anumber1

Posted
Posted (edited)

Looks a lot closer to $200 for all 4 sensors.

 

And that would be buying the most expensive parts at Rock Auto

 

https://www.rockauto.com/en/catalog/chevrolet,2005,silverado+1500,5.3l+v8,1431121,emission,oxygen+(o2)+sensor,5132

 

You mentioned you were all about the fuel economy.

 

Nice, fast, fresh o2 sensors are high on the list of making your truck run as good as it can. That would go much farther than removing your catalytic converter and continuing to run your ride in a poor state of tune.

 

Regardless of whether or not you decide to remove your emissions equipment or not, getting your truck to run to perfection is the best way to ease the pain of low miles per gallon (or turn your 33"s through the bogs or across the desert).

 

While you are at it, a nice, clean MAF sensor is pretty important also...

 

It's not like it's 1981 anymore. The cats on your truck flow pretty good, rarely go bad unless abused and with a stock motor, you will not realize much in performance gains pulling them.

 

Have you been running your truck with a bad misfire for a while? Do you go through a lot of oil? If so, then the cat may really be dead.

Edited by anumber1
anumber1 Enthusiast

anumber1

Posted
Posted

Do new O2 sensors improve mileage? How often do they go bad? I'm sure mine are originals, 11 years old and 140k miles...

O2 sensors definitely have a finite lifespan.

 

Even if they "work" enough to not throw a code, they get "lazy" with age and miles.

 

Typically, you can back probe them to see how fast/well they are cycling (measuring in milivolts).

 

So, yes, in short, you can improve mileage if you have slow/lazy sensors.

 

I treat em like tune up parts. Change plugs, change at least the upstream o2 sensors.

  • Like 2
rdnkcpa Enthusiast

rdnkcpa

Posted
Posted

Also, you need to troubleshoot what made the cat go bad. Most likely with the loss in fuel economy, understanding you have 33's and a lift, your computer is dumping more fuel in to compensate for some type of lean condition. I would first check for a vacuum leak. Plug a scan tool in and see what the fuel trims are.

 

If your cats are in fact bad, they are getting cheaper. I just bought one for my son's Monte Carlo for $165 off of Amazon.

 

Second if this is your DD and you want better fuel economy, return it to near as stock as possible. Or, park it and get something better on fuel. I wonder if over on the Prius forums they have people wondering how to increase the payload or towing capacity of their cars.....

 

I parked my Silverado, bought a Chevy Cruze Turbo Diesel for commuting. 42-46MPG on the highway.

  • Like 1
rdnkcpa Enthusiast

rdnkcpa

Posted
Posted

And, I forgot to mention, I replaced all four O2 sensor's on my pickup earlier this summer.

 

I got all four sensors from Amazon for $144.24. AC-Delco Part # 213-1702.

  • Like 2
WilliamBos Senior Enthusiast

WilliamBos

Posted
Posted

Is their a special socket for O2 sensors?

 

Removing cats will not improve mpg, it could get worse with no O2 sensors. The GM cats have been highflow since they Vortec'd back in 1996.

anumber1 Enthusiast

anumber1

Posted
Posted

Is their a special socket for O2 sensors?

 

Removing cats will not improve mpg, it could get worse with no O2 sensors. The GM cats have been highflow since they Vortec'd back in 1996.

 

Yep.

 

This is a cheap example. Probably fine for occasional use. I have a K/D version of this tool and a 3/8 drive, "crowfoot" version.

 

http://www.harborfreight.com/78-in-Oxygen-Sensor-Socket-69022.html

 

 

 

I really only use the "special" tool to install a new sensor. I clip the wires on the the sensor to be removed and use a standard deep well socket or box end wrench most of the time.

  • Like 1
  • 5 years later...
bryanrey2324 New Member

bryanrey2324

Posted
Posted
On 8/11/2016 at 11:56 AM, anumber1 said:

hey i have a 03 5.3 chevy silverado and i want to do a cat delete and replace with headers which headers would be best for it to sound loud?

 

 

  • 3 years later...
L Simpson New Member

L Simpson

Posted
Posted

Technically, if you do not have converters, present on your vehicle that is less than twenty five years old, that will fail inspection. 

More and more places are going to emissions testing also. The emission testing is tied in with the state's computer and they will know who does and who does not passed emissions test.

Depending on if You are ever stopped for a DOT inspection on the road, You could receive a fine for the catalytic converter removal.

 

  • 11 months later...
asilverblazer Senior Enthusiast

asilverblazer

Posted
Posted
On 2/15/2026 at 12:29 PM, Kelly88guillory said:

I have an 09 Silverado 1500 with a 5.3, has anyone gutted or removed catalytic converters? How’d it run afterwards? What did you do to avoid the check engine light? 

Re-read the 10-year-old thread. 

It will run the same.

You will have to get a custom tune to solve the check engine light.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...