Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Enough people believe it that marketing uses the term successfully. The rest of us know "Weight" when used like this means "Grade", An agreed viscosity spec at 100 C. 

 

We use the terms heavy and light to describe the viscosity of a pancake batter. Sometimes stuff just sticks 😬

Thats too grey for me, people need to get "MORE SMARTER"  🤣

Posted
2 hours ago, customboss said:

That's too grey for me, people need to get "MORE SMARTER"  🤣

 

Lord man, have you met people? 

:rolleyes:

 

Communication is nearly impossible. Everyone has their own DICTIONARY. Their own "SCIENCE". BELIEF has become a proxy for TRUTH. GOOD is BAD and BAD is GOOD. The snowflakes are so plentiful they've become all alike.

:banghead:

 

:rant:

 

 

 

 

  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Lord man, have you met people? 

:rolleyes:

 

Communication is nearly impossible. Everyone has their own DICTIONARY. Their own "SCIENCE". BELIEF has become a proxy for TRUTH. GOOD is BAD and BAD is GOOD. The snowflakes are so plentiful they've become all alike.

:banghead:

 

:rant:

 

 

 

 

  

This where Soylent Green comes into play. Or Covid. 😵💫

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Nascar runs electronic fuel injection now, and they routinely run their water temps at 250 degrees.  If they made more power at 220 or 180, they'd let more air through to run them cooler.

 

It is true that closing off the nose for aerodynamic reasons is a component of this, but everything begins with the horsepower.

 

With the new car that was introduced this year, they are no longer allowed to put tape over the grill opening, but they still allow the engines to run hotter, certainly not at 170 or 180.

Posted (edited)

what fuel do they used at 250 water temp?   every strategy has a reason, running 250F at extreme high loads may just be as cool as they can obtain with minimum drag.. do they even use thermostats? I wonder if they just use a flow restrictor instead?

 

for comparision, what temps do F1 race cars operate at?

 

I have a 170, stat, and it only operates in the 180-190 temp zone if i keep the throttle conservative and the loading reasonable on the motor. I hit 200 F doing 2 wot 1/4 mile passes. so i tend to think Nascar cars cannot maintain low temps under the loading they operate at.. I'm sure they would love to get them to operate cooler for durability but it may not be feasable

Edited by pokismoki
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, pokismoki said:

what fuel do they used at 250 water temp?   every strategy has a reason, running 250F at extreme high loads may just be as cool as they can obtain with minimum drag.. do they even use thermostats? I wonder if they just use a flow restrictor instead?

 

for comparision, what temps do F1 race cars operate at?

 

I have a 170, stat, and it only operates in the 180-190 temp zone if i keep the throttle conservative and the loading reasonable on the motor. I hit 200 F doing 2 wot 1/4 mile passes. so i tend to think Nascar cars cannot maintain low temps under the loading they operate at.. I'm sure they would love to get them to operate cooler for durability but it may not be feasable

 

 

I think I can answer some of your questions...

 

Every Nascar national touring series runs gasoline for fuel.  In fact, the gasoline is a spec item and purchased at the track.

 

They do not run thermostats in Nascar engines.  I do not know if they restrict the water in any way or not.  For about the final 15 years that I ran my short track cars, I didn't run any kind of restrictor for the water.  Maximum cooling efficiency is obtained when you have maximum coolant flow.

 

I do not know what kind of water temps F1 cars run with.  I don't pay a lot of attention to F1.

 

Howard Stewart used to have a great cooling guide on his water pump website.  That guide continued after he sold out his business to EMP a number of years ago.  I just went looking for it, and it appears that the Stewart EMP site is either down or moved somewhere else.  In that guide, Stewart debunked a bunch of the old wive's tales about cooling.  The old wive's tale about needing to restrict the water was one of the debunked ideas.

 

The fact that your engine runs hotter when you run it harder probably has a lot more to do with airflow than with coolant.  90% of all cooling problems are air flow problems.  If your coolant temp is 200 when it really matters most, then your 170 thermostat doesn't appear to doing much of anything for you.  If you want to run cooler, then your answer probably lies with your fan, your shroud, and the ducting in front of your radiator.

 

The last few years I ran my stock car on dirt, my temps never got over 180, even in the heat of the east Texas summer.  I was running a Stewart water pump, no water restriction of any kind, a CV products copy of the old GM 4 blade fan, and a really good fan shroud.  That motor was a flat top 400 with Vortec heads.  My fuel was 20% 108 octane racing fuel and 80% 93 octane pump gas...

 

I forgot to mention above that the fuel also plays a huge role in cooling.

Edited by etex211
  • Like 3
Posted
15 hours ago, etex211 said:

Nascar runs electronic fuel injection now, and they routinely run their water temps at 250 degrees.  If they made more power at 220 or 180, they'd let more air through to run them cooler.

 

It is true that closing off the nose for aerodynamic reasons is a component of this, but everything begins with the horsepower.

 

With the new car that was introduced this year, they are no longer allowed to put tape over the grill opening, but they still allow the engines to run hotter, certainly not at 170 or 180.

 

Entirely different world from NHRA. No one there running 5W oils...right? 😉

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Entirely different world from NHRA. No one there running 5W oils...right? 😉

 

 

 

Nascar used to qualify on 0w0.  I don't know what they use now.  A lot of the old qualifying practices have been abolished by the sanctioning body, mostly to control expenses.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,860
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    HWN808
    Newest Member
    HWN808
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 995 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • https://www.gm-trucks.com/why-gm-chose-0w-30-gen-6-v8-oil/   The swing back to reality continues…
    • Diesel $5.42 at the truck stop on the hi-way
    • I'm not sure if this should be a new topic, let me know if it's out of place. This my first post. Thanks 85077522 - AC Delco GM Genuine Parts Brake Master Cylinders. Anyone else had to replace this brake master cylinder yet. I didn't do any brake work, it looks like new parts and I've had the truck for about 4k miles, 119k total miles.  When it started to throw codes I did the calibrations with a bidirectional scanner and got the codes to clear but they came back so I did the routine; base bleed, automated bleed and final base bleed. All that with Bosch ES16-32N fluid (please look it up). That seemed to fix it but 100ish miles later it failed again so I ran the same process but with a pressure bleeder this time and got the same results, fixed for 100ish miles. The original fluid looked bad and I thought I got most of it out, it could've been the wrong fluid. The codes; P25A2, C05B0-00, C2A1B. I can get them to clear but not for long. The C05B0 indicates a leak in the front circuit (which is bone dry) so I'm thinking of doing the bleed process on that front again today and I don't know if that's taboo to just do the front but at this point it seems like it's worth the try anyway. The new master cylinder/module unit is supposed to get here today. But now I'm pretty much convinced this install is over my head. I've called several shops and some mobile guys that I know but this thing is like radio active material, scary wise. I did get 2 local shops say they should be able to do it, one says he has the SPS2 programing capability. And with the battery disconnected is there supposed to be pedal resistance, mine is to the floor, then if I pump it I can get some resistance. I had a panic stop prior to this issue which may have contributed from what I read. And on the first attempt to bleed and hydraulic test the scanner listed things to look for and one was any gaps between the pad and rotors which I did notice on the RF corner and I removed the outer pad (where the gap was) cleaned it and the hardware and didn't see a gap after that but will re-check it. I read that if pushing the caliper pistons back then you're supposed to open the bleeder so as to not push fluid backwards into the abs module or it will damage it. If that's true then that's also a possibility from the previous owner having the brakes changed before I got it. I'm using an XTool ip500 scanner. Any suggestions, questions and comments welcome. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...