Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Enough people believe it that marketing uses the term successfully. The rest of us know "Weight" when used like this means "Grade", An agreed viscosity spec at 100 C. 

 

We use the terms heavy and light to describe the viscosity of a pancake batter. Sometimes stuff just sticks 😬

Thats too grey for me, people need to get "MORE SMARTER"  🤣

Posted
2 hours ago, customboss said:

That's too grey for me, people need to get "MORE SMARTER"  🤣

 

Lord man, have you met people? 

:rolleyes:

 

Communication is nearly impossible. Everyone has their own DICTIONARY. Their own "SCIENCE". BELIEF has become a proxy for TRUTH. GOOD is BAD and BAD is GOOD. The snowflakes are so plentiful they've become all alike.

:banghead:

 

:rant:

 

 

 

 

  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Lord man, have you met people? 

:rolleyes:

 

Communication is nearly impossible. Everyone has their own DICTIONARY. Their own "SCIENCE". BELIEF has become a proxy for TRUTH. GOOD is BAD and BAD is GOOD. The snowflakes are so plentiful they've become all alike.

:banghead:

 

:rant:

 

 

 

 

  

This where Soylent Green comes into play. Or Covid. 😵💫

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Nascar runs electronic fuel injection now, and they routinely run their water temps at 250 degrees.  If they made more power at 220 or 180, they'd let more air through to run them cooler.

 

It is true that closing off the nose for aerodynamic reasons is a component of this, but everything begins with the horsepower.

 

With the new car that was introduced this year, they are no longer allowed to put tape over the grill opening, but they still allow the engines to run hotter, certainly not at 170 or 180.

Posted (edited)

what fuel do they used at 250 water temp?   every strategy has a reason, running 250F at extreme high loads may just be as cool as they can obtain with minimum drag.. do they even use thermostats? I wonder if they just use a flow restrictor instead?

 

for comparision, what temps do F1 race cars operate at?

 

I have a 170, stat, and it only operates in the 180-190 temp zone if i keep the throttle conservative and the loading reasonable on the motor. I hit 200 F doing 2 wot 1/4 mile passes. so i tend to think Nascar cars cannot maintain low temps under the loading they operate at.. I'm sure they would love to get them to operate cooler for durability but it may not be feasable

Edited by pokismoki
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, pokismoki said:

what fuel do they used at 250 water temp?   every strategy has a reason, running 250F at extreme high loads may just be as cool as they can obtain with minimum drag.. do they even use thermostats? I wonder if they just use a flow restrictor instead?

 

for comparision, what temps do F1 race cars operate at?

 

I have a 170, stat, and it only operates in the 180-190 temp zone if i keep the throttle conservative and the loading reasonable on the motor. I hit 200 F doing 2 wot 1/4 mile passes. so i tend to think Nascar cars cannot maintain low temps under the loading they operate at.. I'm sure they would love to get them to operate cooler for durability but it may not be feasable

 

 

I think I can answer some of your questions...

 

Every Nascar national touring series runs gasoline for fuel.  In fact, the gasoline is a spec item and purchased at the track.

 

They do not run thermostats in Nascar engines.  I do not know if they restrict the water in any way or not.  For about the final 15 years that I ran my short track cars, I didn't run any kind of restrictor for the water.  Maximum cooling efficiency is obtained when you have maximum coolant flow.

 

I do not know what kind of water temps F1 cars run with.  I don't pay a lot of attention to F1.

 

Howard Stewart used to have a great cooling guide on his water pump website.  That guide continued after he sold out his business to EMP a number of years ago.  I just went looking for it, and it appears that the Stewart EMP site is either down or moved somewhere else.  In that guide, Stewart debunked a bunch of the old wive's tales about cooling.  The old wive's tale about needing to restrict the water was one of the debunked ideas.

 

The fact that your engine runs hotter when you run it harder probably has a lot more to do with airflow than with coolant.  90% of all cooling problems are air flow problems.  If your coolant temp is 200 when it really matters most, then your 170 thermostat doesn't appear to doing much of anything for you.  If you want to run cooler, then your answer probably lies with your fan, your shroud, and the ducting in front of your radiator.

 

The last few years I ran my stock car on dirt, my temps never got over 180, even in the heat of the east Texas summer.  I was running a Stewart water pump, no water restriction of any kind, a CV products copy of the old GM 4 blade fan, and a really good fan shroud.  That motor was a flat top 400 with Vortec heads.  My fuel was 20% 108 octane racing fuel and 80% 93 octane pump gas...

 

I forgot to mention above that the fuel also plays a huge role in cooling.

Edited by etex211
  • Like 3
Posted
15 hours ago, etex211 said:

Nascar runs electronic fuel injection now, and they routinely run their water temps at 250 degrees.  If they made more power at 220 or 180, they'd let more air through to run them cooler.

 

It is true that closing off the nose for aerodynamic reasons is a component of this, but everything begins with the horsepower.

 

With the new car that was introduced this year, they are no longer allowed to put tape over the grill opening, but they still allow the engines to run hotter, certainly not at 170 or 180.

 

Entirely different world from NHRA. No one there running 5W oils...right? 😉

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Entirely different world from NHRA. No one there running 5W oils...right? 😉

 

 

 

Nascar used to qualify on 0w0.  I don't know what they use now.  A lot of the old qualifying practices have been abolished by the sanctioning body, mostly to control expenses.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,943
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Dom Colussi
    Newest Member
    Dom Colussi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 566 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
    • *Your      
    • I'd guess that it's because they are Mann-Hummel filters since about 2016, they own Wix and are mostly all made in China now. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...