Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2016 Z71 Silverado 1500... I have read that changing the 195 degree thermostat to a 160 degree will increase the horsepower. However I live in Massachusetts, so how is that going to affect the heat in the winter? Will it be significant or not much?

Posted

I have never heard of lowering it to increase HP. I know guys that go a lower temp T-stat in old muscle cars to try and keep the Motor running cooler. The thought being that heat is the enemy and would possibly not wear the engine as much. If you did lower it it would effect your heat and it would be colder air coming out of the vents though.

  • Like 2
Posted

I'm pretty sure it would still run around its 192 degree mark, I know my 02 with a 180 thermo ran at the same temp as stock

Posted

160 will not throw heat once it gets below 40 degrees.

 

From what I remember, it was a trick back in the day but took a chip or programming to get any benefits. Otherwise, it's not good for the engine, too cold is not good.

 

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

Posted

if ur riding around at 160 ur gonna get way worse milage also. leave it alone. if you want to cool it down more you can have a tune to turn your fans on at a lower temp

Posted

160 will not throw heat once it gets below 40 degrees.

 

From what I remember, it was a trick back in the day but took a chip or programming to get any benefits. Otherwise, it's not good for the engine, too cold is not good.

 

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

I agree here,I also ran my fans longer on a programmer (not extreme,moderately)and brunt fans out,learned hard way.This wasn't a GM,but thought I share to know possibilities.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I have ran 160° in every one of my vehicles from 1989 Formula all the way up to my recent LTx series trucks. No issues at all, to many people regurgitating info from forums and such anymore in regards to them that is inaccurate.

 

GM has to use a higher factory stat in order to meet emissions requirements. Pure, plain and simple is that answer. So yes, you can run a lower stat and yes it will help with keeping the truck cooler, it will help with keeping detonation away as well and NO it wont affect your gas mileage one bit. You will need a custom tune if you run a 160° stat as it will trip a P0128 code in the ECM during the cold months, the ECM has to see 167° with in so many key cycles otherwise the ECM thinks the thermostat is stuck open. You will still have heat as well from the heater, maybe not roast you out of the cab heat, but heat none the less.

 

I have been using the 180° stats now, they are cooler than the factory 196° stat and also don't require any programming as it still allows the ECM to see the 167° temp, you will also have heat as well from the HVAC with this stat.

 

I will put a 180° stat in my truck eventually, just had too many other projects going so far this year to mess with it.

  • Like 2
Posted

I have ran 160° in every one of my vehicles from 1989 Formula all the way up to my recent LTx series trucks. No issues at all, to many people regurgitating info from forums and such anymore in regards to them that is inaccurate.

 

GM has to use a higher factory stat in order to meet emissions requirements. Pure, plain and simple is that answer. So yes, you can run a lower stat and yes it will help with keeping the truck cooler, it will help with keeping detonation away as well and NO it wont affect your gas mileage one bit. You will need a custom tune if you run a 160° stat as it will trip a P0128 code in the ECM during the cold months, the ECM has to see 167° with in so many key cycles otherwise the ECM thinks the thermostat is stuck open. You will still have heat as well from the heater, maybe not roast you out of the cab heat, but heat none the less.

 

I have been using the 180° stats now, they are cooler than the factory 196° stat and also don't require any programming as it still allows the ECM to see the 167° temp, you will also have heat as well from the HVAC with this stat.

 

I will put a 180° stat in my truck eventually, just had too many other projects going so far this year to mess with it.

Umm, I've ran 160 and 180 stats (when that was all "the rage"), and depending on the part of the country you live, you may not get any appreciable heat in the cab...been there, done that, and have the frosty toes to show for it.

 

Not saying whether it does anything for performance, just that in colder climates you may not have cab heat.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

I have a 2016 Z71 Silverado 1500... I have read that changing the 195 degree thermostat to a 160 degree will increase the horsepower. However I live in Massachusetts, so how is that going to affect the heat in the winter? Will it be significant or not much?

 

While you may pick up a couple of HP, it'll be so small it would be difficult to measure on a dyno, much less feel in real life, so don't do it for that reason. The only reason one should consider a lower temp thermostat on a stock or nearly stock engine in one of these trucks is if you do a lot of towing in hot weather up large grades. For that they can help keep temps down. Otherwise there's no real benefit.

 

From my experience, 160 is too low for winter use. The heat will not be as hot and you can run into trouble defrosting at highway speeds. A 180 is generally "hot enough" for winter use but obviously won't give heat quite as hot as stock so if you have no need for it I wouldn't recommend it.

 

Changing the thermostats on these trucks is only about a 10 minute job (especially if you get an extra housing) so if you do want cooler temps for summer towing, there's no reason to not do that because you're worried about the winter time--just swap twice a year.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 241 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...