Jump to content

Low temperature thermostat?

Z71DarkDragon16
 Share

Recommended Posts

Z71DarkDragon16 Enthusiast

Z71DarkDragon16

Posted
Posted

I have a 2016 Z71 Silverado 1500... I have read that changing the 195 degree thermostat to a 160 degree will increase the horsepower. However I live in Massachusetts, so how is that going to affect the heat in the winter? Will it be significant or not much?

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

pokismoki
pokismoki

i'm using the  Katec 175 thermostat, best upgrade for Hp for the $$$ spent. you can also try the cts-V stat 195 not much difference vs stock there.    not until i got my hptuners was i able

Grumpy Bear
Grumpy Bear

Lane:    IMHO you would be best served using the 174 F thermostat. Not just because a tune isn't required.    Log your oil temperature. It needs to stay above 170 F fully warmed to

etex211
etex211

I think I can answer some of your questions...   Every Nascar national touring series runs gasoline for fuel.  In fact, the gasoline is a spec item and purchased at the track.   Th

Posted Images

66deadhead Enthusiast

66deadhead

Posted
Posted

I have never heard of lowering it to increase HP. I know guys that go a lower temp T-stat in old muscle cars to try and keep the Motor running cooler. The thought being that heat is the enemy and would possibly not wear the engine as much. If you did lower it it would effect your heat and it would be colder air coming out of the vents though.

  • Like 2
LongrangeLauber Senior Enthusiast

LongrangeLauber

Posted
Posted

I'm pretty sure it would still run around its 192 degree mark, I know my 02 with a 180 thermo ran at the same temp as stock

sdeeter19555 Senior Enthusiast

sdeeter19555

Posted
Posted

160 will not throw heat once it gets below 40 degrees.

 

From what I remember, it was a trick back in the day but took a chip or programming to get any benefits. Otherwise, it's not good for the engine, too cold is not good.

 

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

tbarn Senior Enthusiast

tbarn

Posted
Posted

You would probably get a service engine soon light

Rkaroll953 Enthusiast

Rkaroll953

Posted
Posted

if ur riding around at 160 ur gonna get way worse milage also. leave it alone. if you want to cool it down more you can have a tune to turn your fans on at a lower temp

Nightwalker Enthusiast

Nightwalker

Posted
Posted

160 will not throw heat once it gets below 40 degrees.

 

From what I remember, it was a trick back in the day but took a chip or programming to get any benefits. Otherwise, it's not good for the engine, too cold is not good.

 

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

I agree here,I also ran my fans longer on a programmer (not extreme,moderately)and brunt fans out,learned hard way.This wasn't a GM,but thought I share to know possibilities.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted

I have ran 160° in every one of my vehicles from 1989 Formula all the way up to my recent LTx series trucks. No issues at all, to many people regurgitating info from forums and such anymore in regards to them that is inaccurate.

 

GM has to use a higher factory stat in order to meet emissions requirements. Pure, plain and simple is that answer. So yes, you can run a lower stat and yes it will help with keeping the truck cooler, it will help with keeping detonation away as well and NO it wont affect your gas mileage one bit. You will need a custom tune if you run a 160° stat as it will trip a P0128 code in the ECM during the cold months, the ECM has to see 167° with in so many key cycles otherwise the ECM thinks the thermostat is stuck open. You will still have heat as well from the heater, maybe not roast you out of the cab heat, but heat none the less.

 

I have been using the 180° stats now, they are cooler than the factory 196° stat and also don't require any programming as it still allows the ECM to see the 167° temp, you will also have heat as well from the HVAC with this stat.

 

I will put a 180° stat in my truck eventually, just had too many other projects going so far this year to mess with it.

  • Like 2
sdeeter19555 Senior Enthusiast

sdeeter19555

Posted
Posted

I have ran 160° in every one of my vehicles from 1989 Formula all the way up to my recent LTx series trucks. No issues at all, to many people regurgitating info from forums and such anymore in regards to them that is inaccurate.

 

GM has to use a higher factory stat in order to meet emissions requirements. Pure, plain and simple is that answer. So yes, you can run a lower stat and yes it will help with keeping the truck cooler, it will help with keeping detonation away as well and NO it wont affect your gas mileage one bit. You will need a custom tune if you run a 160° stat as it will trip a P0128 code in the ECM during the cold months, the ECM has to see 167° with in so many key cycles otherwise the ECM thinks the thermostat is stuck open. You will still have heat as well from the heater, maybe not roast you out of the cab heat, but heat none the less.

 

I have been using the 180° stats now, they are cooler than the factory 196° stat and also don't require any programming as it still allows the ECM to see the 167° temp, you will also have heat as well from the HVAC with this stat.

 

I will put a 180° stat in my truck eventually, just had too many other projects going so far this year to mess with it.

Umm, I've ran 160 and 180 stats (when that was all "the rage"), and depending on the part of the country you live, you may not get any appreciable heat in the cab...been there, done that, and have the frosty toes to show for it.

 

Not saying whether it does anything for performance, just that in colder climates you may not have cab heat.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted

I have a 2016 Z71 Silverado 1500... I have read that changing the 195 degree thermostat to a 160 degree will increase the horsepower. However I live in Massachusetts, so how is that going to affect the heat in the winter? Will it be significant or not much?

 

While you may pick up a couple of HP, it'll be so small it would be difficult to measure on a dyno, much less feel in real life, so don't do it for that reason. The only reason one should consider a lower temp thermostat on a stock or nearly stock engine in one of these trucks is if you do a lot of towing in hot weather up large grades. For that they can help keep temps down. Otherwise there's no real benefit.

 

From my experience, 160 is too low for winter use. The heat will not be as hot and you can run into trouble defrosting at highway speeds. A 180 is generally "hot enough" for winter use but obviously won't give heat quite as hot as stock so if you have no need for it I wouldn't recommend it.

 

Changing the thermostats on these trucks is only about a 10 minute job (especially if you get an extra housing) so if you do want cooler temps for summer towing, there's no reason to not do that because you're worried about the winter time--just swap twice a year.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • davester
      Bench seat swap for 2021-2024 suburban

      By davester · Posted

      probably won't get a response from that user, as they haven't returned to the site since making that one post.  users don't (at least I don't, and I haven't seen any setting which would notify me via say, email) get any notification other than going to this site, and checking if they got a response on their thread...
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • Grumpy Bear
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...