Jump to content

6.2 with afe intake = 36hp!


truckguy82

Recommended Posts

Posted

GM is not leaving 36 hp on the table. That's just ridiculous. I'm sure Blackbear didn't do anything malicious...but there's something for sure flakey with their data.

I use to think this way but after getting a tune on this truck, I believe gm will leave that much power on the table and then some. Gm de-tuned these trucks this much why would they not restrict air flow?

  • Replies 192
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

As a reputable tuner, you yourself should question those dyno results. I can't believe anybody that knows much about cars thinks an intake tube would gain 36 hp. A high flowing intake manifold has never gained that much power...a good cam swap gives 50-60 hp and would require tuning...that tube isn't much different than any other tube on the chart...

Not sure what to tell you, the results are what they are. We were just as surprised.

Posted

As a reputable tuner, you yourself should question those dyno results. I can't believe anybody that knows much about cars thinks an intake tube would gain 36 hp. A high flowing intake manifold has never gained that much power...a good cam swap gives 50-60 hp and would require tuning...that tube isn't much different than any other tube on the chart...

What is there to question?

 

They bolted on an intake and dyno'd it, thats what came out. It's pretty simple.

 

Seriously I'm curious, what would you personally do if you were doing this test, you started swapping out intakes and you received these results

Posted

What is there to question?

They bolted on an intake and dyno'd it, thats what came out. It's pretty simple.

Seriously I'm curious, what would you personally do if you were doing this test, you started swapping out intakes and you received these results

Ignorance is pretty simple. Dyno results can easily be manipulated, on purpose or on accident.

Posted

Of course there is HP left on the table for all the reasons already stated. I'm lucky enough to also own a Kawasaki H2 that new makes just over 200hp. An air filter and a tune it goes up to ~230 and with a pipe ~270hp ...on a motorcycle. Id say they left some on the table.

 

GM gave us an engine that can be drag raced and put it into a truck that has to meet stiff regulations. The power is bottled up within those regulations ...just uncork the bottle.

Posted

Ignorance is pretty simple. Dyno results can easily be manipulated, on purpose or on accident.

What other data would you need to show that the dyno sheets have not been manipulated? Someone would be pretty hard up to try to manipulate dyno sheets, quite frankly, not worth our time.

 

Sent from my fone.

Posted

Jenna and Justin don't pay the Trolls any attention, there is always the naysayers who say that it is all smoke and mirrors because the manufactures know what they are doing and would never limit a vehicles potential. People don't realize that there are corporate bean counters and corporate lawyers who raise concerns about putting powerful vehicles on the road due to how historical litigation has played out. They also don't realize that the manufactures have to meet certain emission requirements, noise/vibration/harshness requirements and also have to take into consideration than a huge portion of the purchasing customer base wont take care of the vehicle correctly so the manufacture has to build the vehicle for the masses of dummies that will own the vehicles and to make sure the warranty that the manufacture has to provide will be able to cover the vehicles without having it in the shop weekly due to break downs.

 

Years ago I did a 1 day dyno session on my 2008 Corvette. I went from the stock airbox setup to the Z06 airbox setup and then to a Airaid airbox setup. Car went from 370rwhp, then to 379rwhp then to 387rwhp. So to pick up 17rwhp with just changing the airbox was documented. Even still some of the Corvette owners came out saying it was false and I was lying and that there is no way there was that much power on the table.

 

Sorry folks, the manufactures do leave that much power on the table, all day and every day. They build a product that will appease the masses but will also survive the warranty period the manufacture has to cover. It is a gamble on the manufactures side and on the owners side. With that I knew my truck picked up some power when I put the Airaid kit on my 2016 truck, I expect the same result when I pick up the 2017 Camaro SS in a couple of months and swap the air intake on it as well.

Posted

Ignorance is pretty simple. Dyno results can easily be manipulated, on purpose or on accident.

Yes so they chose to manipulate one that does not require much, if it all, tuning.....yet they are a company that primarily makes money from tuning.

Posted

I expect the same result when I pick up the 2017 Camaro SS in a couple of months and swap the air intake on it as well.

Lol thats probably the only vehicle (and the vette) you could not expect the same results since its the same engine used in the test but makes 40 more hp.

 

Btw I rented a camaro 1ss 2 weeks ago, holy shit that car is incredible. It is unbelievable you can get that much performance and build quality for that price. Thing was soo abused by renters and it still felt as solid as a bank vault.

Posted

Of course there is HP left on the table for all the reasons already stated. I'm lucky enough to also own a Kawasaki H2 that new makes just over 200hp. An air filter and a tune it goes up to ~230 and with a pipe ~270hp ...on a motorcycle. Id say they left some on the table.

 

GM gave us an engine that can be drag raced and put it into a truck that has to meet stiff regulations. The power is bottled up within those regulations ...just uncork the bottle.

Yeah I just found that out about the h2 a few weeks ago. That's pretty crazy. I used to ride a lot, cannot even fathom what 270hp is like when my 125hp 600 gave me actual tunnel vision the first time I did a first gear pull.

Posted

An intake that could flow 36 more horsepower than stock is way too far fetched for me to believe. I also have a hard time believing that one hollowed unobstructed tube flows 36 more horsepower than another nearly identical unobstructed hollow tube. Nothing said by any body on this thread so far will change my mind, so we'll just have to agree to disagree. Thanks.

Posted

An intake that could flow 36 more horsepower than stock is way too far fetched for me to believe. I also have a hard time believing that one hollowed unobstructed tube flows 36 more horsepower than another nearly identical unobstructed hollow tube. Nothing said by any body on this thread so far will change my mind, so we'll just have to agree to disagree. Thanks.

How funny you should mention that. Because they actually tried just replacing the "hollow unubstructed tube" you can see that on the dyno of the "mit intake tube" by itself. It did infact make almost no gains at all.

 

When they replaced the entire intake box, which does have an obstruction, an air filter, they saw big gains.

 

Would you be as surprised if someone replaced headers and made 36hp? Probably not. Guess what they are...drum role....hollow unobstructed tubes

Posted

Sooo, just change the filter? I've seen other threads that say it's the tube. Wonder why GM uses such a restricted filter? Probably to filter out dirt. I always use a K&N drop in myself.

Posted

Sooo, just change the filter? I've seen other threads that say it's the tube. Wonder why GM uses such a restricted filter? Probably to filter out dirt. I always use a K&N drop in myself.

Dont know, but it's definitely in the box itself

 

Anyone want to pop the filter out and try a pull?

Posted

How funny you should mention that. Because they actually tried just replacing the "hollow unubstructed tube" you can see that on the dyno of the "mit intake tube" by itself. It did infact make almost no gains at all.

 

When they replaced the entire intake box, which does have an obstruction, an air filter, they saw big gains.

 

Would you be as surprised if someone replaced headers and made 36hp? Probably not. Guess what they are...drum role....hollow unobstructed tubes

Header gains aren't all that impressive.

 

9c0da82eea7e14fbc16c1cccd3b8a7c5.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 711 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks; I looked there a few minutes, and I think I can find something. I really never looked there, as I thought it was stuff like PTO/aftermarket bodies/accessories like snow plows.
    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...