Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Driving home from town today, slowing for a left turn, light throttle, truck dinged and had no power. Would not go over 25 mph or so. Little to no power. All gauges ok. CEL on. Just short of 5000 miles, 2017 CC 5.3. SLT.

 

Took it to the dealer. Waited 2 hours. Tech plugged it in and told me the fuel pressure regulator was reading too high. He cleared the code and drove me home in my truck. He called me later and said there was a "PI" from GM about this. It needs a fuel pressure switch but probably a new pump. He said they will put a switch in and if it does it again a new pump.

 

http://gm.oemdtc.com/tag/p228d

 

Im thinking both would make me feel better about driving my new truck out of town.

 

I joked to him, "Well the fuel pumps used to last 150,000 miles in my old trucks. I guess 5,000 miles is the new standard."

 

He was silent....

Posted

Unfortunate. These direct injection systems do worry me some. BMW was an early adopter and they had tons of high pressure fuel pump failures. And they're not cheap to replace.

Posted

Mine failed recently. Same "Engine Power Reduced". Dealer replaced the pump.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did they just replace the pump on the first visit? Or did they replace the pressure switch first?

Posted
Did they just replace the pump on the first visit? Or did they replace the pressure switch first?[/quote

 

Pump first time. I had some intermittent jerking under acceleration that I was attributing to various things - transmission, gas, pump, traction control, etc. Of course dealer couldn't reproduce (neither could I). I left the dealer and attempted to get on the freeway when power died and I got the message. That was the first time I got a code and they replaced the pump.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

 

Did they just replace the pump on the first visit? Or did they replace the pressure switch first?[/quote

 

Pump first time. I had some intermittent jerking under acceleration that I was attributing to various things - transmission, gas, pump, traction control, etc. Of course dealer couldn't reproduce (neither could I). I left the dealer and attempted to get on the freeway when power died and I got the message. That was the first time I got a code and they replaced the pump.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Thank you

 

How long ago was that? Any issues since?

Posted

ame="p7m89mm" post="1927182" timestamp="1485326227"]

 

 

 

Thank you

 

How long ago was that? Any issues since?

Late December. Truck has been running perfect since. I had them install the GM performance intake at the same time ;). It's a great match to my GM/Borla exhaust!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Late December. Truck has been running perfect since. I had them install the GM performance intake at the same time ;). It's a great match to my GM/Borla exhaust!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

What Chevy performance intake are you speaking of? Was it P/N 84016022?

Edited by davidio840
Posted

 

What Chevy performance intake are you speaking of? Was it P/N 84016022?

Yes. I've see a few different pictures online. The one in this before and after from another user on the site is it...

 

cd0dcb18e5c48419939e0edbc60ea6b7.png

 

Sounds pretty throaty. It does give me a little drone (helicopter sound) at certain RPMs. Only when accelerating in v4 at low speeds though. Sounds fine on the freeway.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

#PIP5459: DTC P228D

 

A vehicle may come in with DTC P228D (Fuel Pressure Regulator Control Performance - High Pressure) set current or history.

 

A fault with the fuel rail pressure sensor. Do not replace the Engine’s High Pressure Pump.

 

Correction

 

If this is encountered it is recommended to replace the Fuel Rail Pressure sensor.

 

This PI specific for 2017.

Edited by 15HDriver
Posted

 

My post has it basically word for word more or less.

Ok, thanks alot for the info. So it sounds like my dealer tech is on the right track with my issue?

Posted

Got the truck back today. The dealer tech said they replaced the fuel pressure sensor on the fuel rail under the intake manifold. He said they had the scanner run the pressure way up to "test" the system and its working fine now..... fingers crossed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,351 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...