Jump to content

first small road trip. terrible MPG


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have every confidence the "Active Aero Shutters" will turn my beast into a 50mpg Prius....... And never jam with bugs or dirt or cause the engine to overheat........

 

Another questionable feature - cap-less fill - somebody needs to make a cap for that! :dunno: Seems like I will open the door to find water, snow, ice or dirt in the recess for the gas nozzle............

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I always get a kick when the internet speeding police come out of the woodwork.

 

The safest way to drive is with the flow of traffic. 75mph is about the flow of traffic on most major highways. It is without a doubt more dangerous to have some righteous law abiding citizen atitude and chug a long at the speed limit while disregarding everybody else passing you.

Posted

I always get a kick when the internet speeding police come out of the woodwork.

 

The safest way to drive is with the flow of traffic. 75mph is about the flow of traffic on most major highways. It is without a doubt more dangerous to have some righteous law abiding citizen atitude and chug a long at the speed limit while disregarding everybody else passing you.

 

I agree. Even though I tend to keep it within 10 over the posted limit (I learned this early on to avoid getting pulled over in WI) When I travel though large metro areas- which for me are Milwaukee, Chicago, or Minneapolis- I disregard the posted speed and just follow the car in front of me for the most part.

 

That said, there are still some a-holes who want to drive recklessly and try to dart in and out of traffic causing others to slam on brakes. Those idiots should be removed from the road to make it safe for others.

 

My philosophy in the road is: I do not cause anyone else to hit the brakes for me. I merge in and get out of the way. I wish more people would do the same.

Posted

I always get a kick when the internet speeding police come out of the woodwork.

 

The safest way to drive is with the flow of traffic. 75mph is about the flow of traffic on most major highways. It is without a doubt more dangerous to have some righteous law abiding citizen atitude and chug a long at the speed limit while disregarding everybody else passing you.

 

 

I always get a kick when Internet law breakers come out of the woodwork.

 

The safest way to drive is to abide by the law and drive the speed limit. Most major highways have a posted speed limit of 70 (although there are some exceptions...I think Texas has 80 or 85 in a very small area.) It is without a doubt more dangerous to have some unrighteous law breaking citizen travel passed the speed limit while disregarding the safety of everyone else.

Posted

These trucks are just slightly more aerodynamic than a brick. Are you really surprised you got bad mpg at 80mph? If you can even call over 16mph bad. My '98 Dakota with a 5.2 averaged 12mpg combined and I have a lifetime average of 16.1 on my '15 Sierra CC 5.3.

Posted

These trucks are just slightly more aerodynamic than a brick. Are you really surprised you got bad mpg at 80mph? If you can even call over 16mph bad. My '98 Dakota with a 5.2 averaged 12mpg combined and I have a lifetime average of 16.1 on my '15 Sierra CC 5.3.

I get great mileage at 80mph, right about 20mpg.

 

My old tahoe really got bad around 70mph, this truck doesn't seem to mind much until low 80's.

Posted

Truckguy what state do you live in?

South Jersey (different state than north jersey)

 

I get like 11-12mpg in suburbia and 20-22mpg traveling back and forth from NJ to Vermont

Posted

Saturday I drove from mid CT to Portland Maine( 200 miles). On the way I set the cruise control around 78. I only was getting around 16.7 mpg. I used 3/4 of a tank getting up there. On the way back I set the cruise lower to around 75ish. I couldn't get more then 17mpg out of the truck. Truck is a 16 custom, 5.3 6 speed with the tow package. I kept an eye on the 4cyl and 8cyl switchover and the truck was constantly going back and forth. It would never stay in 4 cyl mode for more then a few seconds. The tuck has a kn air filter and besides that its stock. When I first bought the truck I was getting around 17 around town. I do have a 1.5 level kit in the front but I can see that killing my fuel economy that much. Anyone have the same issue?

16-18 mpg is about normal for me on the interstate. Sure wish my 5.3 could get the 24+ mpg the 6.2 guys get.

Posted

Warm/hot outside without running the AC, running 65-70mph= 21-22mpg.......................I've done 20.5mpg running 80+mph though.

 

Cold/frigid outside running 65-70mph=17-18mpg.

 

All of the above running the Range AFM delete. Just saying of course.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 705 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...