Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all,

I am trying to determine if gm oem part number 84007564 will fit on the 2500HD/3500HD. These are gmc like on the 1500 Chevy for 2016. I was wondering if they would fit on the HD's. Maybe one of you guys has already installed them and would have pictures of a HD with them on. I have searched this forum and internet and cannot find the answer. Only thing I know right now is most aftermarket flares for 1500 fit 2500/3500 trucks.

Thank you

Posted

Hello all,

I am trying to determine if gm oem part number 84007564 will fit on the 2500HD/3500HD. These are gmc like on the 1500 Chevy for 2016. I was wondering if they would fit on the HD's. Maybe one of you guys has already installed them and would have pictures of a HD with them on. I have searched this forum and internet and cannot find the answer. Only thing I know right now is most aftermarket flares for 1500 fit 2500/3500 trucks.

Thank you

I do not understand your question but what I can tell you is that the fenders are the same on the half ton and HD trucks.

 

The GMC flares will not install on a Chevy as the GMC fenders are molded to accept the flares.

Posted

Okay that helps. Basically the part number I listed is gmc style flares but for Chevrolet 1500 and they are oem gm. They also are supposed to fit around all the rock guards. I can't find any aftermarket flares that fit around rock guards. So since they are for 1500 I was hesitant about putting them on HD. I am going to order up these an I will take pics and post.

Posted (edited)

Yea, GMC flares don't fit the Chevy trucks. The GMC fenders and box sides, the fender lip is stamped to fit the fender flares.

 

GM sells the 19303290 flares (by EGR) for Chevy trucks.

 

Bushwacker makes the thinnest ones I've seen yet http://www.bushwacker.com/fender-flares/chevrolet-oe-style-fender-flare-set-of-4-oe-matte-black-40956-02. The GM ones are pretty large IMO.

Edited by 15HDriver
Posted

Guys I am trying to determine wether the part number I have listed in first post is going to work on HD. At this point since I know the fenders are the same they are getting ordered and cross my fingers they fit fine.

Posted

Guys I am trying to determine wether the part number I have listed in first post is going to work on HD. At this point since I know the fenders are the same they are getting ordered and cross my fingers they fit fine.

So this information isn't on the internet?

Posted

Ya the website you directed me to says for 1500 I am trying to put these on 3500 srw. I have googled with every key word I can think of. No big deal though I am going to order them tomorrow and hope they fit.

  • 9 months later...
Posted

Bumping to see if anyone has tried to add these flares to a 2500HD truck.  Just purchased a 2500HD and these flares look like the best option as they go over the air deflectors.  As you say, all other flares seem to be interchangeable.   

Thanks

 

2018 Alaskan Edition Z71

  • 10 months later...
Posted (edited)

Old post, but...  I've ordered a set of 19393290 for my 3500HD.  Won't get a chance to install them until the start of April, but happy to report back if still interested.

Edited by deminimis
  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 7/8/2017 at 10:46 AM, newdude said:

Yea, GMC flares don't fit the Chevy trucks. The GMC fenders and box sides, the fender lip is stamped to fit the fender flares.

 

GM sells the 19303290 flares (by EGR) for Chevy trucks.

 

Bushwacker makes the thinnest ones I've seen yet http://www.bushwacker.com/fender-flares/chevrolet-oe-style-fender-flare-set-of-4-oe-matte-black-40956-02. The GM ones are pretty large IMO.

 

 

 

No one reads anymore.

 

Just ask, be needful your entire life. Why can't todays people do anything for themselves?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...