Jump to content

To do or not to do??? Staggered....


2010LTZ4x4

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 hours ago, CMoore711 said:

From my experience your front to back tire diameter difference of .1” (31.9” to 32”) shouldn’t cause any problems with the transfer case.  Usually if you get closer to wheel tire combos that are .30”-.50”+ difference front to back then you’ll start to see problems with traction control systems acting up thinking there’s wheel spin due to the varied wheel rotation speed from the different diameters. But your .1” difference shouldn’t be a problem, the closer in tire diameter front to back the better, same diameter being best. 

 

FWIW I had a staggered wheel tire set up on my previous TBSS that was AWD all the time and in 100K+ miles never had any transfer case issues and although I was not able to properly rotate my tires I would average 70K miles on my rears and 45K miles on my fronts. That was mostly highway miles, driving more city than highway will reduce that tire life without ability to rotate. 

 

The guys in the thread posting comments about “jacking up the rear” and “popular look back in the day” are thoroughly confusing tire width versus tire diameter. It is very possible and quite common to install a wider rear tire offering more traction for RWD applications without changing the tire diameter or vehicle height at all from front to rear. 

 

My only question would by why install a staggered summer tire set up on the same size 20” x 8.5” rims front/rear?  You’re going to end up with significant tire bulge in the rear and a more square tire sidewall in the front.  If it were me I’d pick a different style rim that offered a staggered width to match the tire,  you’re 275/305 tires should be on a 20” x 8.5”/9” front and 20” x 10”/11” rear.

AWD systems are different than the 4WD systems in these trucks.  My recommendation would definitely not put it in 4WD when you have different tire sizes.  It might not break right away but it will add stress to the system.  OP, why do you put it in 4wd during the rain anyway?

Posted
27 minutes ago, Logan Lanfear said:

AWD systems are different than the 4WD systems in these trucks.  My recommendation would definitely not put it in 4WD when you have different tire sizes.  It might not break right away but it will add stress to the system.  OP, why do you put it in 4wd during the rain anyway?

My mistake when writing the Op.  When it's raining I select "auto 4wd" for the added traction from a stop when raining.   I'm a 0-60 kind of driver and prefer the get up and go when the roads are wet.  But I did mention in my last post I will be going with all 4 the same tires now after posting this topic and getting some great opinions and info.  

Posted

Big in the back, Small in the front!!! It's not a woman, but hey... that's the set up for performance cars. In fact my Vette has 19 rears 18 fronts. You gotta do what makes you feel good, life is too short to sweat the small stuff. If you don't like it, you can always change it back.... I say Go For It!

Posted

Would using hub centric spacers for the rear cause any issues?  would give you the look you want, but allow you to rotate tires

Posted
25 minutes ago, bndawgs said:

Would using hub centric spacers for the rear cause any issues?  would give you the look you want, but allow you to rotate tires

I wasn't looking to have tires stick out past the fender.  Just wider tire out back to fill the wheel well more with the same diameter all around. 

I think keeping 4 tires all the same works out better in the long run.   So I ended up ordering 295 50 20.  Thats a little wider than the stock 275's and allows me enough clearance up front to turn.  

Posted

Off the topic, down a bunny hole, but Ed Roth was brought into the thread via Rat Fink....I have a friend that worked for Roth back in the day.  He's still a bit odd guy...my friend.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,731
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DjmFingerstylePlayer
    Newest Member
    DjmFingerstylePlayer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 607 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...