Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I just happen to notice there is a vacuum port on the passenger side of the intake manifold that is not connected to anything or plugged.

 

Is this port supposed to be left open or should it be capped with something? I ran a DIY smoke test on my 5.3 to further investigate a CEL relative to large vacuum leak.

 

Similar to the picture below. The one pictured below appears to have a rubber cap.  Mine does not.

 

Thanks,

Brandon

 

removing-intake-manifold.jpg

Posted (edited)

It should be capped. It is it is unmetered airflow the ECM cannot take  read, thus it is a vacuum leak

Edited by txab
Posted
34 minutes ago, txab said:

It should be capped. It is it is unmetered airflow the ECM cannot take  read, thus it is a vacuum leak

Thanks, someone must have missed this before I owned the truck. It's had code P0455 which I know can be related to other things, but I figured this could be the issue also.

Posted (edited)

From the factory it doesn't really have "cap" like most would think. The "cap" is made as part of the injection molded intake. It can be broken off to open the port if necessary. If you can plug it and your leak goes away you've found your issue

 

 

intake.jpg

Edited by txab
Posted

Is there vacuum at the port while running?

BTW P0455 is not vacuum related.

Posted
14 hours ago, tbarn said:

Is there vacuum at the port while running?

BTW P0455 is not vacuum related.

I've researched the P0455 code as much as I can.  I understand it to be the evap emission system.  does that not have vacuum?

I've seen guys smoke testing vacuum and diagnosing the P0455 code

Posted

It is evap system related. However, it is a sealed evap system leak. The test looks for vacuum decay after sealing the system. Not engine vacuum related. You  should have a lean code if there is a vacuum leak at this spot such as p0171 or p0174.

Posted
7 minutes ago, tbarn said:

It is evap system related. However, it is a sealed evap system leak. The test looks for vacuum decay after sealing the system. Not engine vacuum related. You  should have a lean code if there is a vacuum leak at this spot such as p0171 or p0174.

Thanks for clearing that up for me.  I'm a noob at this stuff.

 

Only code i have is the P0455.  Is there any particular way to test the emission evap system? Or should I just replace that part?

 

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01D8VLULK/?coliid=I2LDZE7C9488QR&colid=2306JRB4EQXZK&psc=0&ref_=lv_ov_lig_dp_it

Posted

90% of p0455 codes are either the vent valve or gas cap. Take your pick and start there. The other 10% could a LOT of other things.

  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)

It needs to be capped. Otherwise code p0171 and p0174 will appear. Lean condition Air leak. If is capped and you get the same codes! look for other air leaks like the manifold gasket is very common issue. Before you change anything I recommend doing a gas pressure test to eliminate a gas issue. Injectors could be bad as well but that’s the Worst case scenario. 

Edited by Jose1993
Posted

If your engine is an E85 capable, then that port being open may also upset the computers ethanol percentage calculation to compensate for more air and dump more fuel in the system at low RPMs. Your fuel mileage will drop a little like 10% and you will need to reset the ethanol percentage and fuel trims after capping the port with a Good bi-directional scanner or Tech II.

 

It probably got knocked off when someone had trouble putting the upper cover back on. I jnow that what happened to mine .

 

 

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 3/12/2018 at 3:15 PM, txab said:

From the factory it doesn't really have "cap" like most would think. The "cap" is made as part of the injection molded intake. It can be broken off to open the port if necessary. If you can plug it and your leak goes away you've found your issue

 

 

intake.jpg

any solutions to seal that plugged port when "cap" is broken off and gone?

 

Posted

Any parts place should have rubber caps that fit that port. 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Ianf said:

Any parts place should have rubber caps that fit that port. 

Correct. Easily found at any parts store

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,782
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Newest Member
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 5,002 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was around and remember that era very well, so I'm calling b/s on that statement. If they were that bad no police department or taxi company would've bought a single one ... but they were used in both services (and fire) for DECADES. They were bulletproof and proven. Even the early 21st century ones weren't too bad! The early models were legendary.   Mine is proof, but people like atlas are blinded by agenda and refuse to believe facts right before their very eyes.   Even decades after they were built, a new generation started driving them, posting all their builds and shenanigans on Grandmarq.net and Crownvic.net. The failures would show up then, since they all were deep past 100k-150k miles by that point, and younger drivers tend to be a little aggressive, especially with vehicles than can lay a one-tire fire for as long as you hold your foot in it. They've more than proven themselves over the decades.   The only thing that'll really take them out is road salt. The bodies and sheet metal were garbage. A victim of the cheapout FoMoCo and GM have been partaking in before then, and since.   Today it's the stuff that counts - the undercarriage that rots away first!    GMs Caprice was no slouch either. Reliable as a stone ax - the opposite of what they build now.    
    • Let me know how your vehicles do in 10 years. You don't know ******, kid. 😂    There's a reason that Panther platform was used as police, fire, and taxi service for DECADES ... long before you were born, apparently.
    • If your connector also has a big lever to get the connector on and off, you don't want to force the lever either way, as it becomes a bigger problem if you bust the lever or the mechanism it works.
    • It's just useful to disconnect the battery to prevent odd shorting out when unplugging/plugging stuff together.  I also  touch the two cable ends together (after disonnecting) to drain the small amount of stored battery energy in various modules.   I believe the main system where you need to be more concerned with, so you need to do the above and then wait some time, iss when you are working on the air bag system, to prevent inadvertent firing of the air bags.   The in-cab switches are just that, plain switches, it's generally not a problem to swap them in/out.  For my '12, I'll get an error message on the dash if I power up the truck w them unplugged, but that's it (power up= turn the ignition on).   The ITBC located above the spare tire is a computer that manages the trailer brake system.  That is probably more important to have the battery disconnected.  It does have to be programmed to the truck, either before or after it's installed, for it to work.  For my '12, I had a very hard time reinstalling the main connector to it (IDK if yours is the same or not), it turned out the silicon seal was jamming up, preventing it from going on all the way.  I finally got it fully installed by lubing the seal with a bit of dielectric grease, then it slid on and latched in place easily.
    • JR ! I just got the truck back from the Dealership today . The technician did a cold remote start on the truck this morning and it made the noise . It was determined that it was a starter issue and replaced it under warranty . Of course   it did not make the sound after a new starter was put in because the truck was not cold . We will we see what happens tomorrow morning when I start the truck cold  . Keep tuned !   Oh I found a video on YouTube of a cold start and it did the same thing your truck and mine do , I will see if I can find it and post it up
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...