Jump to content

2016 Silverado Accident


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Leander139 said:

If they total of I’ll yank that TCM out for ya lol

Thanks! You're the man!

It sounds like you did get hurt (your back and neck). I'm so sorry about that. I hope things get better and that you get a nice settlement from the insurance.

Posted

Sorry about your accident man. But why do people always say "get the insurance company to total it"? As if you control that. 

Two things:

1. Every state has laws that govern "total loss of a vehicle"

 

2. An insurance company looks to spend as little as possible on a claim. A total loss hardly fits into that category.

 

Best of luck!! Hope that lawyer will work for free until you sue the trucking company if that's your plan.

Posted
22 hours ago, gtbigup01 said:

Sorry about your accident man. But why do people always say "get the insurance company to total it"? As if you control that. 

Two things:

1. Every state has laws that govern "total loss of a vehicle"

 

2. An insurance company looks to spend as little as possible on a claim. A total loss hardly fits into that category.

 

Best of luck!! Hope that lawyer will work for free until you sue the trucking company if that's your plan.

 

   Although you can not personally make the definitive choice about totaling it, you do have ability to drastically influence the decision. 

 

    The absolute last thing you want to do after an accident is to just throw up your hands and say "let the insurance company handle it". 

 

    The insurance company has 2 jobs: Collect as much as possible, and pay out as little as possible. 

 

    They are there to make money, not to pad your pockets with cash. 

 

   Just in general, I love getting hit by another vehicle. It is extremely profitable, and If you know how to work the system properly, you can stay within the confines of the law - but still profit by thousands. 

 

  The last guy that hit me, I had a payout from the insurance of $1850. I repaired the vehicle myself in 45 minutes for $105 in parts. 

 

 

   I wish someone would hit my vehicle tomorrow. 

 

 

 

Posted
32 minutes ago, gtbigup01 said:

Sorry about your accident man. But why do people always say "get the insurance company to total it"? As if you control that. 

Two things:

1. Every state has laws that govern "total loss of a vehicle"

 

2. An insurance company looks to spend as little as possible on a claim. A total loss hardly fits into that category.

 

Best of luck!! Hope that lawyer will work for free until you sue the trucking company if that's your plan.

 

 

If you are truly interested in the exact procedure, I can list out the steps on how to make lots money if someone hits you. You will be able to show the list of steps to the insurance company and they will reluctantly say: Yes, technically you are allowed to do that - but we would prefer that you not.

Posted
18 hours ago, gtbigup01 said:

Sorry about your accident man. But why do people always say "get the insurance company to total it"? As if you control that. 

Two things:

1. Every state has laws that govern "total loss of a vehicle"

 

2. An insurance company looks to spend as little as possible on a claim. A total loss hardly fits into that category.

 

Best of luck!! Hope that lawyer will work for free until you sue the trucking company if that's your plan.

Not really true. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. You CAN get the insurance company to total a vehicle when they initially didn't plan on doing so. There are such things as lawyers you know. I once had to fight like hell to get my insurance company to finally reverse their "at fault" decision against me, and they finally did. My wife had to get a lawyer when we were first dating to get her car totaled from an accident that was ruled not her fault, and they eventually totaled the car after putting at least $10,000 of work into it.

 

17 hours ago, starman8tdc said:

 

   Although you can not personally make the definitive choice about totaling it, you do have ability to drastically influence the decision. 

 

    The absolute last thing you want to so after an accident is to just throw up your hands and say "let the insurance company handle it". 

 

    The insurance company has 2 jobs: Collect as much as possible, and pay out as little as possible. 

 

    They are there to make money, not to pad your pockets with cash. 

 

   Just in general, I love getting hit by another vehicle. It is extremely profitable, and If you know how to work the system properly, you can stay within the confines of the law - but still profit by thousands. 

 

  The last guy that hit me, I had a payout from the insurance of $1850. I repaired the vehicle myself in 45 minutes for $105 in parts. 

 

 

   I wish someone would hit my vehicle tomorrow. 

 

 

 

Perfectly said.

Posted
17 hours ago, starman8tdc said:

 

 

If you are truly interested in the exact procedure, I can list out the steps on how to make lots money if someone hits you. You will be able to show the list of steps to the insurance company and they will reluctantly say: Yes, technically you are allowed to do that - but we would prefer that you not.

I'd like to hear the steps involved.  feel free to send me a PM. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Mileguru said:

Not really true. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. You CAN get the insurance company to total a vehicle when they initially didn't plan on doing so. There are such things as lawyers you know. I once had to fight like hell to get my insurance company to finally reverse their "at fault" decision against me, and they finally did. My wife had to get a lawyer when we were first dating to get her car totaled from an accident that was ruled not her fault, and they eventually totaled the car after putting at least $10,000 of work into it.

 

Perfectly said.

Yeah I've heard of lawyers, I did put it in my post. And for the second post there's nothing great about it. The insurance paid you what their estimate it'll cost to get your car repaired at a shop. I'm also willing to bet your $105 parts replacement doesn't quite tell an accurate picture but eh. Whatever works. If getting it totalled is what he wants I hope its paid for, or he has gap or hes coming out on the losing end period

Posted
3 hours ago, bndawgs said:

I'd like to hear the steps involved.  feel free to send me a PM. 

 

I will PM the info to you. Let me know what your thoughts are, and if you have any questions. 

Posted
17 hours ago, gtbigup01 said:

Yeah I've heard of lawyers, I did put it in my post. And for the second post there's nothing great about it. The insurance paid you what their estimate it'll cost to get your car repaired at a shop. I'm also willing to bet your $105 parts replacement doesn't quite tell an accurate picture but eh. Whatever works. If getting it totalled is what he wants I hope its paid for, or he has gap or hes coming out on the losing end period

Gap insurance all the way

 

Posted

Was lucky to have Gap lost my 2015 Impala still lost 2000 What health troubles you are having should be compensated fore Best of luck

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 1 Anonymous, 835 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...