Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, cpaul55 said:

You can pull your RPO codes from the sticker in the glove box and then look them up. Or you can email [email protected] and request your build sheet. You just need to supply your VIN in the email.


My RPO code on build sheet is UQA. Know anything about that one?

 

Thanks 

Posted
4 hours ago, 99Mastercraft said:


My RPO code on build sheet is UQA. Know anything about that one?

 

Thanks 

Google result:


UQA Bose Sound System premium 7-speaker system with amplifier in center console
1 - Included and only available with (Y3I) Infotainment Package II.

Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, 2018GMC said:

Google result:


UQA Bose Sound System premium 7-speaker system with amplifier in center console
1 - Included and only available with (Y3I) Infotainment Package II.


just got off the phone with GMC parts and he said this is in my truck.. part # 22818981

 

where do you recommend I go to look at upgrading this and making it plug and play?

96853105-56EF-4E4E-99FB-AEA2737D50CF.jpeg

Edited by 99Mastercraft
Posted

By upgrade, do you mean the sub, or all 7 speakers? 

"Plug and Play" is a loose term. ? 

I "plug and played" my door speakers (to start off), with relatively low impedance Focal speakers and it was fine. Better. Not great. Fine.  

The sub is not really PnP, because it is integrated into the Bose amp (mine was mounted on the rear cab wall). It can be replaced, but you need to make sure the replacement gets the right signal and has its own amplification. I think Kicker has a product for "just sub" replacement in the center console, or under the rear seat. 

By the time I got to my sub replacement (JL Audio Stealth), I had already replaced the Bose Amp with a pair of JL Audio amps (huge improvement), and upgraded dash speakers (much better mids). That meant installing a NavTV processor that allows the aftermarket amp stuff to use the headunit signals but keep the door chimes, phone, and environment sounds. There are other similar solutions out there now.  

At that point, replacing the JL Sub in the center console was PnP...and is an awesome upgrade.    

Posted

I've got an '18 crew cab, SLT all-terrain with the Bose system and navigation. I think the system sounds great (for the music I listen to) but this past weekend my son was in the back seat and was saying he had a hard time even hearing that the speakers were on when the volume wasn't up to high. That got me thinking about maybe upgrading just the speakers in the doors in the back. Then thought that maybe that would be a bad idea just to do the back, so I thought maybe do the front and back. Looks like I need to go through this thread a little bit since it sounds like the Bose system might be a little tricky to work with. This is NOT my area of expertise.

  • 4 months later...
Posted

My front passenger door Bose speaker sounds like crap so I was going to change out all speakers. I called crutchfield because I was reading different info about the factory Bose speakers ohm rating and crutchfield claim that the dash and rear speakers are 3.2 ohm and the front doors are 4 ohm. This is in a 2015 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali crew cab. 

Now im really confused. Why can’t gm/Bose put the specs on speaker like most do?

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 6/3/2018 at 8:48 AM, 2018GMC said:

I replaced the stock bose 6” sub with a 10” JL Stealthbox that fits under center console. Added a JL audio 300w1v2 amp and audio control lc2i. I left the 4 door and 2 dash speakers stock bose running off 175w bose amp. 

 

IMO sound perfect! Lots of low end bass at ALL volumes. No more bass fade at big volume. 

 

Only problem now is center console rattles!

 

jl also offers a dual 10” under rear seat Stealthbox but I didn’t want to loose under rear seat storage. 

I have that same Stealthbox and amp on order now for my truck. Where did you mount the amp? Is the audio control LC2I required? I want to get it done right the first time and not have to redo a bunch of stuff

Posted

I used the LC2I and one of the wires off the factory Bose subwoofer plug for the amp power signal. Still rocking my JL stealthbox in center console. Has been good except had to reseal stealthbox box where woofer mates to box there was an air leak. 

Posted (edited)
On 8/10/2022 at 8:12 PM, Chadious80 said:

I have that same Stealthbox and amp on order now for my truck. Where did you mount the amp? Is the audio control LC2I required? I want to get it done right the first time and not have to redo a bunch of stuff

I used the LC2I and one of the wires off the factory Bose subwoofer plug for the amp power signal. Still rocking my JL stealthbox in center console. Has been good except had to reseal stealthbox box where woofer mates to box there was an air leak. 
I mounted amp an lc2i under the rear seat. Ran all the wires along the passenger side under door sill covers. 

 

Edited by 2018GMC
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 8/13/2022 at 6:08 PM, 2018GMC said:

I used the LC2I and one of the wires off the factory Bose subwoofer plug for the amp power signal. Still rocking my JL stealthbox in center console. Has been good except had to reseal stealthbox box where woofer mates to box there was an air leak. 

There is only two sub wires from the Bose system right? Did you put a jumper wire on the input to the LC2I then run a pair of RCAs to the amp? I can’t find a definitive answer online anywhere. 
Thanks

Posted
23 hours ago, Chadious80 said:

There is only two sub wires from the Bose system right? Did you put a jumper wire on the input to the LC2I then run a pair of RCAs to the amp? I can’t find a definitive answer online anywhere. 
Thanks


Yes. I used the two wires from the Bose sub plug as the speaker level inputs on the lc2i. That’s the thick black speaker wire I ran from Bose sub plug into LC2i left speaker input. Since there was only one speaker level input from sub I ran it to the left input on the LC2i then just used some short wire to jump the left to right input on lc2i. Not sure if that even mattered. My JL XD300/1v2 turns on when it senses audio from the rca input so no remote wire needed. 

3B843335-7A93-4056-9740-0C16CB986345.jpeg

3F8DF5D3-81E9-4F8D-8CBA-E722E373F593.jpeg

404C8160-1D9A-46CD-9C5C-6BCB20C2E076.jpeg

Posted
31 minutes ago, 2018GMC said:


Yes. I used the two wires from the Bose sub plug as the speaker level inputs on the lc2i. That’s the thick black speaker wire I ran from Bose sub plug into LC2i left speaker input. Since there was only one speaker level input from sub I ran it to the left input on the LC2i then just used some short wire to jump the left to right input on lc2i. Not sure if that even mattered. My JL XD300/1v2 turns on when it senses audio from the rca input so no remote wire needed. 

3B843335-7A93-4056-9740-0C16CB986345.jpeg

3F8DF5D3-81E9-4F8D-8CBA-E722E373F593.jpeg

404C8160-1D9A-46CD-9C5C-6BCB20C2E076.jpeg

Awesome! Thats how I’ll wire mine. Can’t wait to get some depth to the bass. 

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Just did a sub addition to 2017 Sierra CC with Bose, pretty straightforward job.

 

I considered the Kicker plug & play from GM but figured I'd rather be able to upgrade amp/sub in future instead.

 

Ran 4g Stinger power wire from battery to rear wall, down passenger side (used the fender to door jamb route)

Removed rear seats to access factory amp wires, tied into factory sub wires at amp with Kicker KISLOC2 (line out converter)

From that to Kenwood 300w RMS x1 amp to an under seat Kicker CompC 10" box (rated for 300w rms).

The KISLOC2 needs no power and has a built in remote turn-on wire for amp, that was convenient.

 

The sound is greatly improved! the 10" sub & 300w is not an eyeball wiggler setup but it hits hard. Big improvement from stock.

The amp was free from my son(but no bass knob dangit), the wire kit ($70), CompC 10" box ($150) and KISLOC2 ($30) ...so only $250 for the upgrade was a breeze.

 

Next step: switch out to a  Kicker L7 12" down firing box and 500w or so monoblock amp (with bass knob), then switch out factory door & dash speakers. I don't think there's a need to replace head unit or factory amp, but we'll see.

  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)

Been a year already. The 10" sub and 500w were good but I had to move up, now Kicker L7 12" downfiring box and Skar EVL 12 running off D4S JP8 amp(.67 ohm load total!). The amp needs plenty of power to run but it rips! If you are planning a system read this: Should have ran 1/0 power wire instead of 4 gauge, will need to replace it sooner than later. Would like to figure out best way to do 2- 12" underseat subs to get rid of the big EVL 12 box but this current setup will be hard to beat given the small underseat volume. Even with a seat lift it will be limited.

Also replaced door/dash speakers with Kenwood Excelon set, sounds cleaner but they need more power so next step is 4ch amp for them, thinking 100w x4 for all door speakers or bridged 200wx2 for fronts only.

FWIW, the factory Bose 6x9 measured 2ohm, the Bose dash 3.6 ohm with a multimeter, the Kenwood stuff is about 3.9 on both. Some say that's not a true way to measure for a speaker resistance, but that's what I got just for a comparison.

Edited by 2UNES
typos

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,694 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...