Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The downshift may have been fixed with a software update or relearn. Depending on the year, I see the early calibrations with much faster downshift times than mine. I moved mine closer, but it is still 0.100-0.200 seconds slower in spots.

 

I checked the torque on mine. The driver strut was not to spec and some of the LCA bolts were slightly under. I have issues replicating, but I guess that is good. I only notice it on sharp turns when I drive into it hard. It just bothers me it happened 2x this week.

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 7/5/2019 at 9:48 PM, FIREBLADE74 said:

I took mine in today for the popping and harsh downshift.

 

I was told that they retourqued everything but still had the popping so they are going to replace the leaf springs eventhough I told them it was heard near the front.

 

They told me that the leaf springs could transfer through to the front, I call BS.

 

I ask what did they do for the hard shifting and he said the leaf springs are causing that too, I call BS.

 

Either way they are replacing the leaf springs once they come in. Ill be honest I haven't had a hard down shift after I took it in.

Did replacing the springs help with the popping? Been too 3 different mechanics. My spring make a lot of noise but I didn’t think I would be able too feel it up in my feet. 

  • 8 months later...
  • 1 year later...
Posted

Looking for a solution to this problem too. I get front end popping at slow speeds with sharper turns too, especially off-camber loading one side more than another. 

Posted (edited)

After having the same popping noise on my recently purchased 2014 GMC Sierra 1500 SLE I took it into the dealership who told me it was the struts due to a 3" leveling kit that was put on it. They recommended a bunch of repairs totaling over $3800. Not feeling satisfied in the answer I took it to another mechanic who told me I needed new tie rods/ball joints to get rid of the problem and it would cost $1700. Still not being satisfied I took it to yet another mechanic who told me It wasn't any of that. It was the Rack and Pinion that needed to be replaced and it would cost $2200 + an alignment. I didn't like any of those answers so I began researching myself and found this issue was the Rack and Pinion Dampner rings. The fix costed $40.

 

https://youtu.be/NFdokVsNgag

 

Moral of the story... Mechanics suck now days and are only looking to make a quick buck. You have to do it yourself.

 

 

SB-10072150-0335.pdf

Edited by Levity
Posted

I had the popping noise at low speed/sharp turns and side to side weight shifting (pulling out of my flat driveway goes to a slightly uphill road) I ended up loosening and re torquing the LCA’s to the above 129ft/lb. Popping gone for me. I noticed my drivers side front bolt was significantly more loose compared to the rest. 
 

2.5” level with Bilstien 5100’s and had 35’s on there until last week. 
 

Took ~30min with driving up on ramps, gathering tools, and drinking a beer. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Had this issue pop up last week. It was a bad sway bar link. Went ahead and replaced both sides. Took about and hour and 30 of that was rounding up tools and such. 

  • Like 1
  • 10 months later...
Posted (edited)

I have a 2015 GMC Sierra all-terrain 4x4 with a 4-in level. I've had that same popping or grinding sound and assumed it was the steering rack, but it is the crossmember that's loose. I have tightened the crossmember to torque specifications four times. It lasts for about 4 days and then as loose again. Do I need to get different bolts for this thing or should I just weld the crossmember in place?

Edited by lschafroth
  • 2 years later...
Posted

My 2016 Silverado 1500 LT Z71 5.3L does the same exact thing. My first time actually googled it and right from the very first result on down I seen many people are having the same issue. iOS am not a certified tech but much of what I have been reading is in agreement with the knowledge and experience I do have assuming you’re hearing the same noise from the same location appears it could most likely be in ascending order the CV joint, ball joint, strut, brake caliper, motor mount. If it were a wheel bearing other symptoms and noises would be present and precede the clunk.  

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...