Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just curious.....what everybody is seeing on their DIC for Trans Temp when cold soaked before starting vs. the ambient air temp?  It looks like I am +20 degrees colder than ambient?  Problem maybe with fluid temperature sensor?

Posted
1 hour ago, mookdoc6 said:

Just curious.....what everybody is seeing on their DIC for Trans Temp when cold soaked before starting vs. the ambient air temp?  It looks like I am +20 degrees colder than ambient?  Problem maybe with fluid temperature sensor?

Just a though. The trans and 12+ quarts of fluid is a big heat sink. By 4 AM or so the fluid and ambient are likely very close. By 6 or 7 am the air temp has risen but the larger heat sink taking longer to heat lags behind. Mine is behind some days and ahead some others. Never tried matching it to the evenings temperature cycle. There is this as well. The ambient sensor in my truck will go down 10 or so after being started and moving down the road. My Honda does that too. That sensor is very near the cowl and easy to bake. 

Posted

I have the same problem.  These photos were taken on June 26th in Tampa Florida. Temps never even get close to 59 degrees that time a year.  

4AFE6DD8-5583-433D-974A-5E606277F8E3.jpeg

25507DE7-A393-427E-B24D-B3CF9C9DB2F1.jpeg

Posted
3 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Just a though. The trans and 12+ quarts of fluid is a big heat sink. By 4 AM or so the fluid and ambient are likely very close. By 6 or 7 am the air temp has risen but the larger heat sink taking longer to heat lags behind. Mine is behind some days and ahead some others. Never tried matching it to the evenings temperature cycle. There is this as well. The ambient sensor in my truck will go down 10 or so after being started and moving down the road. My Honda does that too. That sensor is very near the cowl and easy to bake. 

Yeah, probably to some extent especially with rapid temp changes ambient to garage etc.  My problem was the garage never gets below 100f and just happened to notice the trans fluid @ 85f in morning?

Did not have to think much beyond that as it sat in 115f heat for 5-6 hours....I drove away only to realize that 86f after my stop watch hit 15 minutes it went to 82f?  First out of pocket expense!  Dang 64K harness costs 100.00 and have to buy fluid now 200.00........Could be worse I suppose?

Posted
2 hours ago, Bryn7471 said:

I have the same problem.  These photos were taken on June 26th in Tampa Florida. Temps never even get close to 59 degrees that time a year.  

4AFE6DD8-5583-433D-974A-5E606277F8E3.jpeg

25507DE7-A393-427E-B24D-B3CF9C9DB2F1.jpeg

You probably have the same failure of harness fluid temperature sensor as myself?  Sucks....but could be worse and not too bad of a fix it seems?

Posted

Your right, it could be worse. I just hate the fact that I’m having trouble convincing the dealership that the sensor is reading incorrectly.  They must think I’m stupid, but your fluid can’t be colder than ambient temperature by that much. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Bryn7471 said:

Your right, it could be worse. I just hate the fact that I’m having trouble convincing the dealership that the sensor is reading incorrectly.  They must think I’m stupid, but your fluid can’t be colder than ambient temperature by that much. 

Yup, not after setting all night...I will install after I receive the harness and report back............

  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 8/7/2018 at 5:23 PM, Bryn7471 said:

I have the same problem.  These photos were taken on June 26th in Tampa Florida. Temps never even get close to 59 degrees that time a year.  

4AFE6DD8-5583-433D-974A-5E606277F8E3.jpeg

25507DE7-A393-427E-B24D-B3CF9C9DB2F1.jpeg

I'm having the same exact issue right now.  After sitting all night, ambient was 69F.  I started my truck this morning before the sun came up and the trans read 39F.  I also notice that it won't shift into 8th(or maybe lock up) on the highway until the sensor reads ~75ish.   I'm also concerned about the trans thermostat.  Is that controlled by this sensor or is it mechanical?  I guess I need to get this fixed either way.  No codes yet....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...