Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, cs2016lt said:

Thanks, that would greatly help! no guessing..

Found the spare, it's a NTE5812 Diode (6A, 100V). Looks like Amazon only sells them in a 5 pack. 

 

https://www.amazon.com/ELECTRONICS-NTE5812-STANDARD-DIODE-pieces/dp/B011N9OCV4/ref=sr_1_cc_2?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1533862118&sr=1-2-catcorr&keywords=nte5812

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Geez, Amazon Canada doesn't even sell them and .com won't ship lol. 

 

The reg diodes used under the dash that we've been using won't work?

Posted
10 hours ago, Pearl2017 said:

Props for the great idea/contribution!

I have not looked at the schematic so don't know, but do the fogs normally power from a relay? Concern for me would be if you are now powering the fogs piggybacked on another circuit. If there is a relay that jumper could/should be going to the energizing coil of the fogs relay. This way it is pulling power on its intended fused circuit and not doubled up on another.

 

On those fuse taps... Make sure you orient the tap correctly so that the LOAD is connected AFTER the fuse and not before. One leg of a fuse is BATTERY and the other leg goes to the LOAD. If you orient it incorrectly you could continue to pull power even if the fuse blows. You can find the BATTERY leg by pulling the fuse and using a voltmeter to find which pin is +12v and make sure the tap is on the other pin.

Would this apply the same to both ends of the jumper wire, or is the concern only for the end attached to the DRLs?

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, jimlem said:

Would this apply the same to both ends of the jumper wire, or is the concern only for the end attached to the DRLs?

The diode is allowing current to flow from the DRL's/Parking Lamp to the Fog Light, and as diode's are designed, it doesn't allow current to flow back to the DRL from the Fogs. The question/point they are bringing up is that my wire does a direct jump and bypasses the fuses, so the fear is that current coming from the DRL's/Parking Lamps could overload the Fogs and/or put too much draw on the DRL's - causing an electrical failure or burn up. My wire is next to the fuses and doesn't go through the fuse itself, that's why I mentioned in one of my replies that I am adding the fuse taps this weekend and will update my original post. By using the fuse taps, it guarantees the current is flowing through the fuses and not bypassing them. As I also mentioned, I never had an issue with this mod for 4 years in another vehicle BUT adding the fuse taps is cheap insurance that nothing will happen to your fog lights and/or truck.

Edited by midwestdenaliguy
  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Roscopcoletrain said:

Geez, Amazon Canada doesn't even sell them and .com won't ship lol. 

 

The reg diodes used under the dash that we've been using won't work?

Any 6a, 100v diode will work. It doesn't have to be the exact brand I used. I'd just do a general search online for a 6a 100v diode (you may also see it called a rectifier or rectifier diode - they all serve the same purpose and will work) or call a local electronics shop near you in Canada.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, midwestdenaliguy said:

The diode is allowing current to flow from the DRL's/Parking Lamp to the Fog Light, and as diode's are designed, it doesn't allow current to flow back to the DRL from the Fogs. The question/point they are bringing up is that my wire does a direct jump and bypasses the fuses, so the fear is that current coming from the DRL's/Parking Lamps could overload the Fogs and/or put too much draw on the DRL's - causing an electrical failure or burn up. My wire is next to the fuses and doesn't go through the fuse itself, that's why I mentioned in one of my replies that I am adding the fuse taps this weekend and will update my original post. By using the fuse taps, it guarantees the current is flowing through the fuses and not bypassing them. As I also mentioned, I never had an issue with this mod for 4 years in another vehicle BUT adding the fuse taps is cheap insurance that nothing will happen to your fog lights and/or truck.

I learned something new! lol

 

 

Posted

UPDATE - the fuse tap link in here is for a mini fuse and not a micro fuse, they are too big to use (just learned the hard way). Fortunately it was only an $8 lesson. Here are the correct fuse taps (micro):

 

Wirenest Micro2 ATR Fuse Tap 16awg with 15A Fuse - 5 Pack https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XKWWS7B/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_03eDBbJ6KZ2V2

 

I'll install them this weekend and update this thread.

Posted

technically it is illegal to have fog lights on with high beams. I don't think you would ever get in trouble though.

Posted
1 hour ago, djw88 said:

technically it is illegal to have fog lights on with high beams. I don't think you would ever get in trouble though.

so whose going to driving around town with High beams on anyways and if people did, those idiots don't get tickets for that.  I see plenty who doesn't give a hoot Seriously.. LOL   even if fogs were on with high beams that reserved for rural and country driving (off road).  The same as if you were to use your flood lights, there ain't nothing illegal about that.

Posted
2 minutes ago, cs2016lt said:

so whose going to driving around town with High beams on anyways and if people did, those idiots don't get tickets for that.  I see plenty who doesn't give a hoot Seriously.. LOL   even if fogs were on with high beams that reserved for rural and country driving (off road).  The same as if you were to use your flood lights, there ain't nothing illegal about that.

That's what I'm saying. lol probably not going to be an issue but it is technically illegal.

Posted
16 minutes ago, djw88 said:

That's what I'm saying. lol probably not going to be an issue but it is technically illegal.

Was waiting for someone to chime in with this :-) I know you're simply pointing it out, but that is a law I'll never understand. Getting a ticket for driving with brights on or HIDs in the wrong housing makes sense because you're blinding people, but fogs that are aimed at the ground in front of you? How is that dangerous?

  • Like 1
Posted
On 8/9/2018 at 4:14 PM, midwestdenaliguy said:

Yeah, those fuse taps would be cheap peace of mind. Just ordered a set that'll arrive Saturday. I'm going to install those and update my original post. Even though I didn't have an issue before, I'd feel terrible if someone followed this and it led to a major problem.

looking forward to see the update. Just ordered them myself.

Posted
On 8/9/2018 at 8:45 AM, midwestdenaliguy said:

I posted this in another thread, but they were looking to only have the fogs on with high beams. My solution has the fog lights automatically turn on, and stay on, anytime the parking lights or headlights come on (hi and lo beam). You never have to hit the button. Figured I'd label this as a "How To" in case those are housed somewhere. I'm new to this forum, so let me know if I should be doing this differently. Cheers!

 

Hey guys - recently bought a 2016 Sierra Denali and joined the forum. Stumbled upon this thread while clicking around. I always gain so much from these forums, so I thought I'd give back in my first post. Here is a simple solution I made to have the fog lights automatically turn on with the day time running lights - did this with my previous truck as well (2008 Cadillac Escalade). I bought a diode and used some 14 gauge wire I had laying around. I wrapped 14 gauge wire to each end of the diode and sealed it with marine grade shrink wrap (waterproof). I then got into the engine bay fuse box and pulled the fuses for the fog lights (#49) and day time running lights (#28 or #29 - can be either, only need one). When I put the fuses back in I wedged the wire in one of the slots for the fuse connector, one end of the diode/wire goes in the fog light fuse and the other goes in the DRL fuse. Keep in mind the diode is directional (only allows current one way), so if it doesn't work at first just flip the wire around. Now anytime your DRL's are on, the fog lights will automatically come on. No need to push the fog light button. The fog lights also stay on when you turn on your brights. I attached a photo of my set up, it was taken standing over the driver side fender looking at the fuse box. Ask any questions if you got em!

Sierra Auto Fog Light Mod.JPG

Is it necessary to use 14-gauge wire?

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,858 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...