Jump to content

4x4 transfer case shift


Recommended Posts

Posted

2000 Silverado -  manual shift 4x4

 

It's pretty hard to get the truck to shift out of 4x4 low.  Even if I pull the truck forward and back.  Is there a reason for this, is there a video on how to lube the linkage mabye?    4x4 high to 2x4 works fine.... no issue there. 

Posted

I should add.. I do put the truck in neutral before trying to shift to 4x4 low... 

Posted

I'd crawl under and spray up the linkage and the lever.  Give it a good lookover for any debris or anything that would keep it from being freed.  Probably never has been in 4LO for a long time LOL.  Got used to 2hi and 4hi. 

Posted

Might be worth checking the transfer case fluid level. Also, as stupid as this sounds: I would recommend reviewing the transfer case shifting instructions in the user manual. I'm often surprised about the little quirks that each T-case has. Some say shift slow, some say shift fast. Others say lock the e-brake, some say to be rolling at 1-2 MPH during the shift. 

Posted

Your right.. I actually just did read the manual, and it says I should be rolling 1-3 mph with Transmission in N when shifting in and out of 4 Low. I wasn't doing this... I was shifting with the truck stopped and not rolling.  Likley the issue.. thanks. 

Posted

Part of the reason for the more difficult shifting is that the Range fork (1 of 2 forks in the T-case) is moving in tandem with the Mode fork, adding to the effort required to move all the parts inside. Also, there is no synchronizer for the shift collar for high/low range like there is for the 4WD output, adding to the effort required. So yes, A gentle roll with the transmission in neutral will make it easiest on you.

 

The pics are from a NP263 I just rebuilt due to being run dry caused by a pump rub failure (check your oil level kids!), but they're virtually identical to yours inside. The first pic is the mode fork (2wd/ 4wd) and the second pic is the range fork (Hi/ Lo). The collar I mentioned is just the left and above in the second pic. This shifts in and out of the planetary gear set to the left in the picture to give you your two speeds.

Resized_20180722_224331.jpeg

Resized_20180723_094124.jpeg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 37's would probably fit with a 3" lift. GM only has two gear ratios for these trucks 3.73 for gas and 3.42 for diesel. And they can't be programmed for anything else at the moment. The rough country module just corrects the speedometer and odometer to adjust for tire size it's not a programming device.   You haven't said if your truck is gas or diesel, but for a gas truck the 10L1000 with 3.73 gears has a lower final drive ratio than the 6L90 it replaced would if it were swapped to 4.10s. GM used the same 3.73 gearing in 6 speed gas trucks. I don't think you'll have any issue running 37's with the 10 speed other than the reduction in mpg and towing/weight capacity which is as much of a function of the lift as the tire size.
    • Actually, it probably was the brakes.  It's weird the way the messages came across, but I took it to the dealer thinking that something was wrong with the sensor and in fact, the rear brakes were shot.  What I don't understand is why the messages never said, your brake pads are low.  First I got the message I posted above, taking about new pads being detected.  Then I got a message saying that the system needed repaired.  It never said, change your brake pads.
    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...