Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...
Posted
On 9/25/2018 at 4:22 PM, Canyon Conundrum said:

Any one out there with the 8 speed transmission not having issues??

Just thought I would throw that out there to see how many are having problems and how many are not.

Thanks

My 2017 had the shudder at 7000 miles. I never questioned what the dealer did, as it has not in the 57,000 miles since acted up. Come back. They supposedly changed the torque converter, and reprogrammed the computer. I lost about 2 mpg, afterwards. I even added a chip. My brotherinlaw had a 2017 Silverado Z71, that had an 8sp in it, that he had GMs lemon law used on. Mine shifts on the 1-2 shift hard at times as well as downshift at times. I like a firmer shift anyways, but not the bang in. Reverse is hesitant on cold start up. As far as programing goes you will have to live with it. I was going to have a chassis tune, done, and found out the COMPUTER was LOCKED and had to be unlocked first. But thats GMs control, over you

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Had a 2017 Colorado Zr1 two years I owned it it was in the shop a total of 54 days same problems down shift hard in low and shifted hard out of low they did everything but replace it and nothing helped. Got tired of messing with it bought a Toyota TRD Spot 4x4 put 900 miles on it after 5 months I traded it in on a 2020 Colorado Zr1. Only have 200 miles on it I hope I have better luck this time.

  • 4 months later...
Posted

So here is what I know about the transmission issue. Supposedly beginning in 2020 they switched transmission fluid to solve issue with fluid sucking up moisture. Original fluid would act like brake fluid. This would cause issue with corrosion in TC and clutch slippage.

 

My 2020 was starting to look like it too was going to have the same problem, but what I have being doing the last week is taking the pups for 2-3 hours drives on freeway, mountain roads and overall constant runs without stopping for 30 minutes minimum. I took my time and care when breaking in the engine for the first 1000 miles, but that does not help the tranny learn what it needs to know. Now that I have 1600 miles on the truck I am taking these long runs to allow the control system to learn about the drive train.

 

Results have been mpg`s running in the 17-19 now running around 25 mpg. I am getting around 25.5 at 75mph on the freeway. Transmission has been learning as well. Downshift from 3-1, 2-1 are now smooth as silk. If roughness comes back, I will go to dealer and have the perform the C-1 clutch relearn. I am attaching bulletin on this. So when dealer says the transmission needs to learn how you drive, on a new truck there is truth to this, but just do what they recommend and make sure you take long very mixed condition runs and give the tranny time to learn. On trucks with more miles and you have had the oil issue addressed and possibly the TC changed, make sure to bring up the service bulletin.  I attached it because frankly, not all dealers do their homework and miss this bulletin.

 

Other than the Infotainment glitches, that GMC says only happens on 7" screen systems, My Denali has been performing as expected.

MC-10169298-9999.pdf

  • 2 months later...
Posted (edited)

Wife's new vehicle is a 2021 Colorado! Z71. Right now it has only 1,200 miles on it. So far, I haven't noticed anything out of the normal.

Edited by glcbn
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Mine was strange during the 500 mile "learn" period.  I use the Trifecta tune and trans performance is perfect.  2017 ZR2 8l45.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

My 17 ZR went 3.5 years before the first shudder.  I got the flush done right away and it's been smooth for the past six months.  To much driving with the shudder can damage the torque convertor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,015 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...