Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey everyone,

I'm looking into getting a exhaust system and have heard good things about the MagnaFlow 15267 Performance Cat-Back Exhaust System. Is anyone running there system on there 2014 an up Silverado 1500? Is there any bad drone when kicked into V4 mode? I'm wanting just a nice deep rumble and an exhaust that you can tell its a V8 when punched on. Does this exhaust do this?

Thanks guys.

Posted
Hey everyone,
I'm looking into getting a exhaust system and have heard good things about the MagnaFlow 15267 Performance Cat-Back Exhaust System. Is anyone running there system on there 2014 an up Silverado 1500? Is there any bad drone when kicked into V4 mode? I'm wanting just a nice deep rumble and an exhaust that you can tell its a V8 when punched on. Does this exhaust do this?
Thanks guys.


I just did a magnaflow 12909 / 14909 stainless muffler only. Had the shop chop out my stock muffler and flapper. Weld in 22” long magnaflow. Kept the stock resonator.

Still very quiet at highway cruse. No drone in v4 or highway speeds. You can hear the cold starts now and above 3k rpm sounds like a v8. I have 6.2 with 3.5” diameter pipe. 5.3 has slightly smaller diameter I believe.

I’m glad I didn’t go louder especially when towing. Now I can hear some v8 rumble. Its definitely tame but a cheaper option than a cat back. Muffler is $120 for aluminized and $180 for stainless. Depending on shops in your area $30 - $100 to cut stock muffler out and weld new in.
  • Like 1
Posted

I have the Magnaflow 15239 on my 2018 6.2 Silverado. I love the sound. nice deep rumble at start up and very quiet at cruising speeds. Can definitely here it when you put your foot into it. I've not noticed any drone what so ever and I have AFM still active. I couldn't stand how quiet the stock exhaust was, couldn't even hear it when I remote started it. 

 

Only thing I may change is the 5" tip, just not sure I care for the size. I'm taking it to my exhaust guy to see if we can change the tip to something a little less noticeable. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, 2009GMC said:

 


I just did a magnaflow 12909 / 14909 stainless muffler only. Had the shop chop out my stock muffler and flapper. Weld in 22” long magnaflow. Kept the stock resonator.

Still very quiet at highway cruse. No drone in v4 or highway speeds. You can hear the cold starts now and above 3k rpm sounds like a v8. I have 6.2 with 3.5” diameter pipe. 5.3 has slightly smaller diameter I believe.

I’m glad I didn’t go louder especially when towing. Now I can hear some v8 rumble. Its definitely tame but a cheaper option than a cat back. Muffler is $120 for aluminized and $180 for stainless. Depending on shops in your area $30 - $100 to cut stock muffler out and weld new in.

 

Did the shop literally just chop off the stock muffler/valve and weld in the new magnaflow muffler you got? They didnt have to bend any new pipe for it to match up with the new muffler did they? Also, if i were to just leave the flapper valve on and just chop off the muffler would it change anything?

Posted
Did the shop literally just chop off the stock muffler/valve and weld in the new magnaflow muffler you got? They didnt have to bend any new pipe for it to match up with the new muffler did they? Also, if i were to just leave the flapper valve on and just chop off the muffler would it change anything?


Yes on first question. Measure twice, cut once and no additional pipe needed. There is a magnaflow 12909 thread in the exhaust mods section with more info. Some have left flapper and added muffler. Sounds near stock until you floor it. Even with the flapper open it is a restriction in the system. They can also squeak over time.

Some have had just a pipe welded in place of stock muffler. But you may get drone or helicopter chop noise in v4.

I noticed the exhaust tone in v4 with stock system. It isn’t much different now. The biggest change is cold starts and more v8 rumble exhaust tone above 3k rpm.
Posted
27 minutes ago, 2009GMC said:

 


Yes on first question. Measure twice, cut once and no additional pipe needed. There is a magnaflow 12909 thread in the exhaust mods section with more info. Some have left flapper and added muffler. Sounds near stock until you floor it. Even with the flapper open it is a restriction in the system. They can also squeak over time.

Some have had just a pipe welded in place of stock muffler. But you may get drone or helicopter chop noise in v4.

I noticed the exhaust tone in v4 with stock system. It isn’t much different now. The biggest change is cold starts and more v8 rumble exhaust tone above 3k rpm.

 

Awesome thanks for the info man. Was the reason you didn’t go with a full system just because of the cost? Just curious

Posted
43 minutes ago, SSchup said:

I have the Magnaflow 15239 on my 2018 6.2 Silverado. I love the sound. nice deep rumble at start up and very quiet at cruising speeds. Can definitely here it when you put your foot into it. I've not noticed any drone what so ever and I have AFM still active. I couldn't stand how quiet the stock exhaust was, couldn't even hear it when I remote started it. 

 

Only thing I may change is the 5" tip, just not sure I care for the size. I'm taking it to my exhaust guy to see if we can change the tip to something a little less noticeable. 

I’m guessing that’s the same system but for the 6.2L?

Would you say it’s worth it to go with a full exhaust system than just a muffler swap?

Posted
17 minutes ago, bhardy said:

I’m guessing that’s the same system but for the 6.2L?

Would you say it’s worth it to go with a full exhaust system than just a muffler swap?

For the price, can’t beat a muffler swap. I wanted a corsa catback but costs $1200. All the catbacks are for sound only. No advertised hp and tq gain. 

 

I was looking for better flow and more sound. The muffler swap and flapper delete was a steal compared to a catback. 

 

If money was no object and I was going to tune, I would go catback for sure

Posted

OP: I have the 12588, which is a 22" catback. The sound is wonderful but is more quiet than the 18" you are looking at. I bought the muffler through Amazon and had my local shop put it on. Muffler, tips, their piping..... Less than $400. One of the best mods I have done.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Hate Work said:

OP: I have the 12588, which is a 22" catback. The sound is wonderful but is more quiet than the 18" you are looking at. I bought the muffler through Amazon and had my local shop put it on. Muffler, tips, their piping..... Less than $400. One of the best mods I have done.

So all you did was a muffler swap as well? Cut the old one out weld the new one in and new piping after that? 

Posted
20 minutes ago, 2009GMC said:

For the price, can’t beat a muffler swap. I wanted a corsa catback but costs $1200. All the catbacks are for sound only. No advertised hp and tq gain. 

 

I was looking for better flow and more sound. The muffler swap and flapper delete was a steal compared to a catback. 

 

If money was no object and I was going to tune, I would go catback for sure

Understood. I may have to put that into consideration. May just save up the cash for the full system.

Posted
32 minutes ago, bhardy said:

So all you did was a muffler swap as well? Cut the old one out weld the new one in and new piping after that? 

No. Went to catback duals. Straight back. I'm on my phone but think there is a pic in my profile.

Posted

I went with the Borla 40946 XR-1 muffler. removed the flapper valve.  Has a nice deep rumble at startup and city driving.  Can't tell its on there on the highway unless you are passing someone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...