Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Dexter Jensen said:

2019 Sierra AT4. My body line is 1/2” off. And 1/2 sunk in width wise. So far I have gotten no where with the dealership. They first told me this was not a warranty issue and I was going to have to live with it. If anyone gets any traction. Please let me know. I am extremely disappointed. Thanks 

1327217F-7B25-4F40-90B3-0EB68CA659C9.jpeg

96DBFE0F-5DD3-4724-9526-20B82AB43713.jpeg

F3692B70-DE09-433A-B619-D5841B0DF498.jpeg

Try another dealership or call GM. I don't get why many people here don't fight back with their dealership's response when they know it's BS. Spending this much money, if a dealership told me to "live with it" I'd raise hell.

 

I took mine in and my service advisor agreed right away that it needed to be adjusted and scheduled an appointment with the body shop for me. 

Edited by Sin City Trail Boss
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Yes actually. It goes in today for new body/box pin  alignment. Gm has said most likely the alignment pins were incorrect placed when mounted and crushed cause the lift in the box. I will post on here as soon as I get it back tomorrow. I have been in contact with GM via Facebook. They have been super fast and responsive 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Yep my 2019 has the same issue on the drivers side it’s a half inch higher on the bed and sunk in from the cab looks like it’s been in a wreck and been half ass fixed passenger side is perfect but drivers side is horrible 

Posted

My trucks bed is over to drivers side over half inch 2019 at4, and also had to replace leaf springs, as they were moving vertically, squeaky and banging, truck has never haul any weight or been off road , dealer said they’d have to hog out the holes , not sure I want that , I have photos , can’t figured out how to post them 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Got mine bed adjusted, went to a larger dealership, they have done a few, it’s almost perfect now, not sure how they fixed it, at least it’s straight , like it should be 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Hello, 

 

I just got a 2020 Chevy 1500 Trail Boss from Autonation North in Denver and it has the same issue regarding the misaligned box. I noticed it a week after I purchased the vehicle. I took it into the dealer and they said the only way to correct the issue was to drill holes into the bed. They told me that there was no possible adjustment with the pins. So did the dealer remove the pins on your truck and put new ones to realign the bed? Who can I contact for this issue? 

Posted

Chalk up another 2020 AT4. It’s a month old and I noticed it. Curious:

- HOW re-align it? Some mention crushed pins, drilling the bed?

- I have a cap ordered that should be here in two-three weeks. Curious now noticeable it’s going to be with a cap on?

C8E5D918-99CD-4576-BA0D-78117F57E1EB.jpeg

24D1F16E-B405-4398-8A54-F4343F985A40.jpeg

Posted

Not sure how everyone else is doing on this, but like "mistaare" and "Dexter Jensen" my White Sierra is the same.  I had Hector, with GM come out to the Gunn Dealer in Selma/Schertz Texas, who also agreed the bed of the truck was not correct.  He stated that it was the first one he had seen, and I stated that I could take him down the line of trucks that are on the lot for sale, and show him five more just like it, which of course he declined.  I also explained to him that the bumper was out of alignment, but he explained that once the bed was fixed it would even up the bumper correctly.  When I asked if they where going to repair it, he said they would take care of it, but would get back in contact with me. After a few weeks of waiting, I called the dealer to see what was going on, and they told me to bring the truck in to have it corrected.  Just got a phone call from Gunn who stated that the bed cannot be moved as it is riveted to the frame, and the only adjustment that could be done was to move the cab of the truck.  Dealer said it looked much better, which it doesn't, but that the bumper was still not correct and they would have to have get another approval from GM.  I told the dealer to keep the truck and see what other dealers are doing to get this corrected, as I feel if you physically moved the cab then something else has to now be out of alignment.  Needless to say, I can see this being a battle as it seems many others have experienced.  I've only been in the truck for 4 weeks, and they have had more than I have.  I pretty much told them if they can't fix it find another truck, and get it switched, as this is ridiculous.  I thank Dexter for posting the work order, as I will be taking this to them to show them how they can get it corrected the right way. 

 

Posted

I stopped and talked to Dealer a couple days ago. He told me the pins probably got crushed and they could loosen 6 bolts that attack the bed to the frame, TRY to shimmy/shift it over some but there isn’t a lot of room for movement. He took pictures and said he was going to contact GM to get it approved. 

Posted

I spoke with a local body shop today, that I have been friends of for quit some time, and was told the beds are removable since they have to do so when working on cabs of trucks when involved in accidents.  Told me the dealer should have never moved the cab if they truly did, as that would drive off the alignment of everything else on the front in or cause the vehicle to look like its tracking or floating from behind.  They also then asked if the frame was bent if the bumper itself is off as well, since the bumper typically attaches to the frame.  As many stated though, they stated the bed should have been removed, re-pinned and aligned to match the cab and the bumper, not vice versus.  

 

Mine is still at the dealer, as they are supposes to have a meeting with the GM of the dealership, service manager, service adviser, and Hector from General Motors to figure out what they are going to do.  Will keep everyone advised.  

Posted
8 minutes ago, Ady Candykitten said:

I spoke with a local body shop today, that I have been friends of for quit some time, and was told the beds are removable since they have to do so when working on cabs of trucks when involved in accidents.  Told me the dealer should have never moved the cab if they truly did, as that would drive off the alignment of everything else on the front in or cause the vehicle to look like its tracking or floating from behind.  They also then asked if the frame was bent if the bumper itself is off as well, since the bumper typically attaches to the frame.  As many stated though, they stated the bed should have been removed, re-pinned and aligned to match the cab and the bumper, not vice versus.  

 

Mine is still at the dealer, as they are supposes to have a meeting with the GM of the dealership, service manager, service adviser, and Hector from General Motors to figure out what they are going to do.  Will keep everyone advised.  

Just got off the phone with Michael Valle (Service Manager) at Gunn GMC/Buick, and they may possibly buy the truck back.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 410 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...