Jump to content

2020 2500HD tire sizing


Vapor Trail

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 12/26/2019 at 8:41 PM, Big Skin said:

Rough Country 3” leveling kit
sku#95830 has upper control arms and shocks

After you can fit 22x10 8x180 with 124 bore 

you have to trim the inside of the rear wheel well extension and the edge of the front wheel well near the engine heater plug 

C030F85F-AD9D-41DC-A37D-8283166DC653.png

Not sure if I wanted to go that extreme but definitely something to think about.  Dont want to get too high for the 5th wheel/gooseneck.

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
On 12/25/2019 at 6:38 PM, Big Skin said:

Sorry it was a Silverado 2500. I will be putting 22’s on mine however I don’t like how a little tire there is with 35’s but don’t think I can fit 37’s tires with a leveling kit so I may need to do a 4” lift. 

2020 gmc 2500 wheel info: 

The bore hole Is 124mm

The bolt pattern is 8x180
Rough Country 3” leveling kit
sku#95830 has upper control arms and shocks

After you can fit 22x10 8x180 with 124 bore 

you have to trim the inside of the rear wheel well extension and the edge of the front wheel well near the engine heater plug 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have vision 20x10 -25 with Nittos 37”.13.50 and had to remove front fender mud flaps, do some modifications to the bracket that holds the mud flap and fendEr liner and trim the plastic under the bumper. 
 

I have been looking at rought country 3” lift kit. I might end up doing sometime this summer 

C465BAE3-CE76-44E5-97BC-79EF83649BF9.jpeg

Posted
39 minutes ago, TrailDemon said:

Site is not letting me download all at once. I apologize for all the post 

DAC53C81-A615-4703-91C1-A84ABCE61EE0.jpeg

That is Beautiful. Really nice truck

Posted

Can anyone with factory ride height go and measure from bump stop to top of lower control arm. I had 295/65/20 nitto ridge grapplers put on this morning. While they had it I had them raise the front with the torsion bars. Only went up 3/4 of an inch on driver side and about an inch on passenger side as they were uneven. No rubbing as of yet but they want me to drive it let the suspension settle then come back in to raise or lower if I want then do alignment on it. I almost think I’m gonna have them lower maybe a 1/4 in as I like a tad bit of rake. But also wanna make sure I don’t eat up ride quality by having the bump stops to close to control arm. Thanks in advance 

Posted
50 minutes ago, Beach0433 said:

Can anyone with factory ride height go and measure from bump stop to top of lower control arm. I had 295/65/20 nitto ridge grapplers put on this morning. While they had it I had them raise the front with the torsion bars. Only went up 3/4 of an inch on driver side and about an inch on passenger side as they were uneven. No rubbing as of yet but they want me to drive it let the suspension settle then come back in to raise or lower if I want then do alignment on it. I almost think I’m gonna have them lower maybe a 1/4 in as I like a tad bit of rake. But also wanna make sure I don’t eat up ride quality by having the bump stops to close to control arm. Thanks in advance 

What year, model, trim level and etc...I could not even find on your profile 

Posted
2 hours ago, Big Skin said:

What year, model, trim level and etc...I could not even find on your profile 

Sorry. 2020 gmc 2500 Denali duramax with snowplow prep package. 

Posted

Beach I will try to look tomorrow. Only 3/4 lift from keys seems little. The one I seen at the dealership went up 2” in the front with keys only.

Posted
3 hours ago, Big Skin said:

Beach I will try to look tomorrow. Only 3/4 lift from keys seems little. The one I seen at the dealership went up 2” in the front with keys only.

Sorry I wasn’t very clear. I still have factory keys. I just had them run the bolts in some to help the new rubber clear and take some of the rake out. But I think they went a little higher than I wanted. I’ve already taken some of it out. Just need to drive it tomorrow and let it settle. Then measure to make sure it’s even 

Posted
3 hours ago, Beach0433 said:

Sorry I wasn’t very clear. I still have factory keys. I just had them run the bolts in some to help the new rubber clear and take some of the rake out. But I think they went a little higher than I wanted. I’ve already taken some of it out. Just need to drive it tomorrow and let it settle. Then measure to make sure it’s even 

Maybe you should get the new keys and have them crank it down since you only need a little to clear the rubber. Should leave you plenty of throw from the bump stop

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 578 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...