Jump to content

6.2 hates regular gas


Recommended Posts

Posted

Just want to know If any one else has the same issue as me.

 My 2018 GMC has 148000 km on it now and has has hated regular fuel since new. The salesman never told me they required premium fuel. So its first 2 tanks we regular and it pinged and sputtered put premium in all problems gone. Now if I can't get premium and have to put in regular the check engine light is on until I can get a full tank of premium then it goes off in under a kilometer.

  Her is the strangest part once my Dad drove my truck he traded his 6 month old 5.3 for a new 6.2. I told him he needed to burn premium he told me no! He has 150 000 kilometers on his now gets better fuel mileage then me and only put premium in when he is pulling a trailer maybe and it never pings. 

 

 My truck does pull harder

Posted

Reset fuel trims and even trans then let the pcm relearn. Also all gas isn't equal and the number on the pump is just a idea of octane ratings. I always run premium in everything.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

So unless a vehicles needs it because of stuff like compression ratio, detenation, or tuned for it, there is no need to use it. Did a graduate project that took a little over a year to do with 4 new vehicles. 2 left at factory specs, 1 tuned, and 1 high compression engine vehicle. The project had to do with this exact subject and it concluded that it is not worth it to use premium unless the engine had to have it because of the things I list. The one big comparison that came up in the test is when we filled up with 85 octane, which is readily available in Colorado because of altitude, then towed the vehicle to South Texas, there was some issues. These tests where conducted during, all seasons, at multiple different altitudes, on the street, multiple dyno runs, and towing. This was not exactly a new study, just went about some of it in a different way. When all said and done it just was not worth the cost, especially when talking about performance that was within a small margin of error. This study just confirmed what so many other studies and people have talked about. Gas companies know it gives people warm feeling using it and they capitalize on it. Oh and midgrade is the fuel companies just slapping people in the face. Now like I tell people all the time with everything, if that's what you want its your money do whatever you want with it.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Posted
9 minutes ago, Bash74 said:

So unless a vehicles needs it because of stuff like compression ratio, detenation, or tuned for it, there is no need to use it. Did a graduate project that took a little over a year to do with 4 new vehicles. 2 left at factory specs, 1 tuned, and 1 high compression engine vehicle. The project had to do with this exact subject and it concluded that it is not worth it to use premium unless the engine had to have it because of the things I list. The one big comparison that came up in the test is when we filled up with 85 octane, which is readily available in Colorado because of altitude, then towed the vehicle to South Texas, there was some issues. These tests where conducted during, all seasons, at multiple different altitudes, on the street, multiple dyno runs, and towing. This was not exactly a new study, just went about some of it in a different way. When all said and done it just was not worth the cost, especially when talking about performance that was within a small margin of error. This study just confirmed what so many other studies and people have talked about. Gas companies know it gives people warm feeling using it and they capitalize on it. Oh and midgrade is the fuel companies just slapping people in the face. Now like I tell people all the time with everything, if that's what you want its your money do whatever you want with it.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 

I agree with all that you say. My father's truck has had 4 o2 sensors and a combustion clean??? What ever that is. My truck 0 maintenance other then oil changes. I just can't figure out why my truck pings and losses about 3 mpg on regular. I also can't figure out why GM would build a truck that is required to burn premium fuel. It says in the owners manual burning regular will void engine warranty!!

Posted

You may have different trans or gears or wheel size. Even same setups can be different in the ve or trans tables. There is a adaptive learn built in that shifts around the settings based on use. So it's all your fault.[emoji38]

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

I hate to say this but if you are running the 6.2 around on 87 instead of the 91 that is clearly says on the gas cap door and in the owners manual that is required, not recommended then you are taking a chance on having ignition related detonation damage done to the engine which GM has now outlined in the owners manual if that happens they may not fix it since it will be due to using the incorrect fuel.

The 5.3l trucks really should be on premium as well, from brand new these trucks have always had pinging and detonation when running 87 octane. I have logged several trucks over the years doing it, it is worse the hotter it is outside versus the cooler to colder months outside.

Just the word to the wise, run it as you want but taking the chance to me isnt worth the $5-$10 savings per tank of gas. If the gas mileage is of that much concern to you then a truck may not of have been the best vehicle choice.

Posted

Gas mileage is an issue when your putting 6000 to 8000 kilometers a month on but I need  truck. We move house structures heavy haul truck is always loaded. Still way cheaper to run this truck then the diesels we had before

Posted
21 hours ago, TJay74 said:


Just the word to the wise, run it as you want but taking the chance to me isnt worth the $5-$10 savings per tank of gas. If the gas mileage is of that much concern to you then a truck may not of have been the best vehicle choice.

actually there is absolutly no cost savings by using 87 octane, it actually cost more per mile to burn, kinda like running e85 in a stock truck and hoping for good mpg.. you want effiency and good mpg, run 91 always!  people cant drive, and the more horsepower the modern cars make , takes more fuel to burn.  drive the speed limit and use V4 mode and cut back on your coffee intake. 

Posted

One thing to try is find a gas station that has a high turn over of fuel. That way it is always fresh also find one that is Top Tier. 

 

To me these new trucks have a high compression ratio.  I know the computer can control everything but compression is compression and if you try to run a low octane fuel you are just asking for problems.  Maybe not now but if you keep the vehicle for a long time it will show up later. 

 

Even Justin from Black Bear Performance told me that if anything run 89 octane and up.  This is from an individual that see's a ton of these vehicles come in to be tuned and he can see what the conditions are from the computer.  If it wasn't a big deal he wouldn't recommend it.

Posted
On 11/3/2019 at 9:02 AM, 1SLOW1500 said:

Reset fuel trims and even trans then let the pcm relearn. Also all gas isn't equal and the number on the pump is just a idea of octane ratings. I always run premium in everything.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

how do we reset fuel trims?

Posted

You can reset the whole pcm or tb %. Meaning after warm up (180egt) you have to bring the throttle up and then let off. Forgot the %. It is in my software. I changed.mine to be lower so it resets more and without being in boost.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 411 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...