Jump to content

Text Messages

Pat Papasergia
 Share

Recommended Posts

kf9yr Enthusiast

kf9yr

Posted
Posted

Try carplay2air.com or a similar device...

I think there was a thread on this forum saying it worked for his 2020 HD.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Stand By Enthusiast

Stand By

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, kf9yr said:

Try carplay2air.com or a similar device...

I think there was a thread on this forum saying it worked for his 2020 HD.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

GM should buy one if those for each of their 2020 customers. You know, the people who assume a modern vehicle would be up to date at least with previous models. Who the heck is going to program their phone into a vehicle during a test drive, and leave their information susceptible to the dealer or somebody else, obtaining the data.

gSwift Enthusiast

gSwift

Posted
Posted

This is a non-issue for me. I love technology and gadgets, but I also want my privacy. I REFUSE to use Apple CarPlay. I'm a single guy that date's...a lot, and the last thing I want is my truck blasting out my new text message through the speakers from one girl if i'm with another. 

 

Hell, I won't even connect to bluetooth because i don't want someone calling and it popping up on my infotainment center. If I want someone to hear a song, I plug it in and play it, then it gets unplugged again.?

 

#singleguyproblems

  • Haha 1
davester Senior Enthusiast

davester

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Stand By said:

GM should buy one if those for each of their 2020 customers. You know, the people who assume a modern vehicle would be up to date at least with previous models. Who the heck is going to program their phone into a vehicle during a test drive, and leave their information susceptible to the dealer or somebody else, obtaining the data.

Um, WTF are you talking about?  GM hasn't shipped any Sierra's/Silverado's with Wireless Carplay yet, so their 2020's are complete up to date with this specific feature, compared with previous models.

Stand By Enthusiast

Stand By

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, davester said:

Um, WTF are you talking about?  GM hasn't shipped any Sierra's/Silverado's with Wireless Carplay yet, so their 2020's are complete up to date with this specific feature, compared with previous models.

You mean 20th Century up to date, or 21st Century up to date? Sorry you got bit by the semantic bug,, but my idea of previous models included other manufacturers and people switching brands thinking the tech might be close to par.

davester Senior Enthusiast

davester

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Stand By said:

You mean 20th Century up to date, or 21st Century up to date? Sorry you got bit by the semantic bug,, but my idea of previous models included other manufacturers and people switching brands thinking the tech might be close to par.

Who has wirelesss carplay?  Ford is adding it to their f150's for 2021. RAM trucks don't have it, and don't appear to have announced when their trucks will get it.  Toyota trucks don't have it.

 

So nobody is "up to date"...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • davester
      Needing this part.

      By davester · Posted

      I'm sure if you went to a junkyard where you go in and pull the part off the truck yourself, not a used part place where they do it for you, you can get that part on it's own.  Depending on if and what else you would be buying, and time of day, they might even just skip over adding it as a item to the bill.
    • davester
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By davester · Posted

      No, we trade them like pokeman cards.
    • davester
      I have an unused GM Authorization code.

      By davester · Posted

      It would be sold as a "kit", lights + auth/programming code.   You can resell the code to someone else, if they just buy the lights, either new or used, and they can then use the code to get them to work on their truck.
    • contrabombarde
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By contrabombarde · Posted

      Apologies in advance, this is a long post, there's a lot to explain.   A friend had a 2010 Avalanche with a 5.3 (LMG) that blew the head gaskets (amount other problems). He gave me a donor motor out of a 2007 suburban (LC9). I got it all installed, and everything hooked up. Went to go start it, and it stumbled a bit at first and died a couple times, but after trying a few times it sounded like it was running very well. Went out to go get some coolant, and came back the next day.    Upon trying to start it, the truck will crank and fire normally and the RPMs will raise to around 1,200 or 1,500, sounding great, and then the RPMs will decrease and it will just die. Repeat that a dozen or two dozen times, and eventually it will fire and idle beautifully. As soon as you touch the throttle, it will start misfiring and sound like absolute trash. When you let off the throttle it will come down and hunt around shaking and misfiring like crazy. A message will come up on the dash saying reduced engine power.    It is throwing codes for a map sensor circuit voltage High, as well as MAF sensor low frequency. With key on engine off, the map sensor reads about 4.8 volts on the vout pin, which the PCM interprets as about 17.8 PSI, contrasted to the barometer which my scan tool tells me reads about 13.5 PSI. However, once the engine starts and is idling this reading drops to about 5-6 PSI at a stable idle, and varies significantly when the engine is misfiring/ hunting like I said before. I should note that I used the intake and MAP sensor from the LC9 engine. I changed the connector on the 2010 harness to The 2007 connector. The pinouts for the sensors were printed right on the top, and I triple-checked that I put the correct wire into the correct place.   On the other hand, the MAF sensor reads consistently 0.0 g/s regardless of State. I have pulled my hair out trying to figure out this last detail. I have tried three different sensors, (all of which should be good, one of which was new), I have verified all the wiring from the sensor going back to the PCM, and have verified that the readings at the PCM are the same readings as at the sensor itself. The intake air temperature sensor is also functioning as normal. I verified all the voltages and grounds etc, and everything is as it should be. I don't have an oscilloscope to verify, but I probed with my multimeter (Klein mm720) on frequency Mode, and it reads that on initial cranking, the maf is producing between 3000 and 7000 HZ, and as soon as the engine fires that falls off to below, 1000, and if the engine continues to run, it will produce somewhat erratic readings between 5 and 100-200 HZ. It does increase notably when the engine is revved despite the misfirings. As I said before, I have verified all of the wires going to the PCM, and I have tried multiple known good sensors. I've tested all the pins and voltages from the sensor and verified them against the manual that they are what they should be. I tested all the wiring for both ohms and voltage drop, and everything tested fine. Like I said I tested at the sensor as well as right at the PCM, everything checked out.   The only other thing of note at least I think is the fact that the engine originally in the truck had VVT, but the engine I put in, the lc9, does not have VVT. I modified the cam sensor plug to work. I reference the wiring diagrams and double-checked that I modified the harness correctly to adapt it. There is obviously a code for the VVT solenoid, but I don't think that's the cause of my problems, and this friend will probably have the PCM sent off to tune out the codes at some point.   I'm writing this for my bed so I don't recall the exact codes, but I'll update the post tomorrow morning with the exact codes. And ideas or feedback much appreciated. 
    • Atlas
      Tire psi

      By Atlas · Posted

      It's possible the two trucks are using different body control modules which is why yours works and the OP's doesn't.   So much in these newer vehicles depends on model/trim configurations, production date. They don't all use the same modules like back in the day.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...