Jump to content

2019 Denali with 22"s - Another Level / Tire Question

I'mAllIn

By I'mAllIn
in Modifications, Wheels & Tires

Recommended Posts

I'mAllIn New Member

I'mAllIn

Posted
Posted

Considering buying a 2019 Denali with the factory 22" wheels.  I'd want to level and replace the stock tires with the biggest possible Nitto Ridge Grapplers that will fit without (or very minimal) rubbing.  I've searched and searched the forum, but now I'm more confused than before.  So, with a level kit (considering Rough Country 2" for Denali with ARC), would 285/55x22 Ridge Grapplers fit?  Anybody running this on factory 22" wheels and if so, can you please share pictures or point me in the right direction?

 

Thanks in advance.

Smoothbassman Enthusiast

Smoothbassman

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, I'mAllIn said:

Considering buying a 2019 Denali with the factory 22" wheels.  I'd want to level and replace the stock tires with the biggest possible Nitto Ridge Grapplers that will fit without (or very minimal) rubbing.  I've searched and searched the forum, but now I'm more confused than before.  So, with a level kit (considering Rough Country 2" for Denali with ARC), would 285/55x22 Ridge Grapplers fit?  Anybody running this on factory 22" wheels and if so, can you please share pictures or point me in the right direction?

 

Thanks in advance.

I don't have your exact setup however, I'm running 285/50/22's on my TrailBoss.  It has the factory 2" Lift on it.  No Rubbing at all on standard offset 22" wheel.

 

I think the 55"s will fit as I have quite a bit of space at full lock before the tire hits the inner fender liners.

 

20191007_155735.thumb.jpg.5127e5940b86d6701b2967ed4528d4d2.jpg

 

I didn't check the control arm clearance. 

 

 

Fltmech Enthusiast

Fltmech

Posted
Posted

Remember the GMC has different wheel well openings. 285-55-22 RG = 34.6. 285-50-22 = 33.5. Both are only 11.69 wide.  I have seen guys run 305-45-22 = 32.80 without interference with the control arm using stock wheels.

Smoothbassman Enthusiast

Smoothbassman

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Fltmech said:

Remember the GMC has different wheel well openings. 285-55-22 RG = 34.6. 285-50-22 = 33.5. Both are only 11.69 wide.  I have seen guys run 305-45-22 = 32.80 without interference with the control arm using stock wheels.

That's a great point.  Now that the wheel wells are different between the GMC and the Chevy.  It might be a tighter fit on the GMC with the squared off design.

hotrodz37 Senior Enthusiast

hotrodz37

Posted
Posted

305/45/22 will fit with a 2” level. Note: not my truck but asked the dealer all about it.

9670def813f5a5abec6e39eea2d500ed.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • Grumpy Bear
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...