Jump to content

TPMS part numbers for 2020

romclean1

By romclean1
in Modifications, Wheels & Tires

 Share

Recommended Posts

romclean1 Enthusiast

romclean1

Posted
Posted (edited)

Just thought this might be useful information for others.   I had a set of aftermarket wheels on my 2018 truck and put them on my 2020.  Turns out those TPMS sensors won’t work with the 2020 HC.  So I went about searching for the right ones to replace.  I found GM part number 13516165 on multiple online sites and ordered a set.   The seller (sourceoneautoparts) put a note in the box, saying to give them a call before spending money in installation just in case.  So I called and the very helpful person said to call the dealer to find the right part as the 2020 wasn’t in his database. I called my dealer and they said my truck actually uses GM part number 13528563.  
 

they were happy to take the return, but I thought I’d give these a try anyway.   Guess what, they registered to the truck first try.  So it appears both part numbers would work.   

  The dealer wanted $52 each for the 13528563, and I bought the 13516165 online for $18 each.   Pays to give it a try.  
 

E9D73FB4-385D-45BE-BD89-A3B07F7D8E35.jpeg

Edited by romclean1
  • Like 1
mafd2 Senior Enthusiast

mafd2

Posted
Posted (edited)

I purchased a set of 4 on ebay new in package for $70 and work perfect.  The GM part # is 84413357.  Be sure the sensors you get are 433mhz and not 314.9 as the 2018 GM trucks.  When I had mine programmed last March, my shop didn't have the 2019 Silverado in the tpms tool.  If your tire store doesn't have the 2019 Silverado programmed in their tool (should by now),  tell them to use a 2018 Chev Traverse or any other GM vehicle that uses 433mhz..  They use the same frequency.  Good luck

 

P.S. be sure the sensors aren't for the trailers.  Look the same but won't work.  People are selling the included trailer sensors as 2019 truck sensors.

Edited by mafd2
  • Like 1
snork Enthusiast

snork

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, mafd2 said:

I purchased a set of 4 on ebay new in package for $70 and work perfect.  The GM part # is 84413357.  Be sure the sensors you get are 433mhz and not 314.9 as the 2018 GM trucks.  When I had mine programmed last March, my shop didn't have the 2019 Silverado in the tpms tool.  If your tire store doesn't have the 2019 Silverado programmed in their tool (should by now),  tell them to use a 2018 Chev Traverse or any other GM vehicle that uses 433mhz..  They use the same frequency.  Good luck

 

P.S. be sure the sensors aren't for the trailers.  Look the same but won't work.  People are selling the included trailer sensors as 2019 truck sensors.

vehicle tpms are 4C and trailer tpms are 4T

romclean1 Enthusiast

romclean1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Got them Installed today,  the 4C’s work just fine.  Also, the tool I bought on amazon works with both the old and the new sensors.   Thanks for the info

  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
Stalin 2500HD New Member

Stalin 2500HD

Posted
Posted

Good job. I bought 2020 Silverado rims and tires package from dealer take offs. Put them on my wife’s 2017 Suburban and come to find out the 2020 TPMS sensors aren’t compatible with 2017 Suburban. Little pissed off because the dealer new what vehicle I was buying for. Now I have to buy sensors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • KARNUT
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...