Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know there have been several topics on this already so I'll keep it short.  Specifically looking to hear from those who have the stamped steel UCA (2017 - 2018) and have 275/60/20 tires on stock wheels.  I think I've convinced myself to not go with UCA replacements and go up to 275/60/20 with a 1.5 inch level.  My question is anyone have any tire rub with this tire size on stock wheels?  Again, just looking for input from those with stamped steel UCA's.  2014 - mid 2016 had cast steel or aluminium which don't seem to be a problem. 

Posted

Honestly I did a lot of research before leveling my 2017, I wanted that size tire with my stock 20s after all my research I went with the ReadyLift 2.25 level with their upper control arms, why GM cheaped out with that garbage I’ll never know. These UCAs have better ball joints and are designed for the level, I have no rubbing anywhere and it drives fantastic. I wouldn’t be happy with a 1.5 level and I doubt you would be either, just my opinion though. I think in the long run you’re better off changing the UCAs on the 17 and 18s.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Thanks, happen to have any pics?  I was leaning towards the 1.5 not only because of the crappy ball joint but also because sometimes I think the 2.25 looks too level, I kind of like a little rake of maybe an inch or so.  But seeing some pics may help.  I have done quite a bit of research on the ready lift kit with UCA's as well and was my next option. That with labor and a set of KO2's was going to be about $2,000.  Was hoping to not spend that much but if that's what it takes to do it right and have no rubbing then I'm not entirely against it.  Any pics you have would be great. 

Posted

Here's a pic from Monday, it also has the Ready Lift 1.5 add a leafs in the rear. I had it all installed with the 275/60/20 Nittos for less than $1500730633b2ea49d5eef7d46dcfb5cd16b2.jpg

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yes.   Yes.   We might be intermingling ideas with the term 'severity', in one of my past vehicles it could pull up DTC via the vehicles own user interface, at any given time when one would do this there would be an assortment of codes that were 'trivial' including 'communication' issues. This would generate a bunch of, potentially false alerts or some many that they would get ignored. Which you mentioned earlier.    You also mention several things that might be redundant with the vehicles own systems or indicators: The truck has an oil pressure gauge, monitoring it via this other system wouldn't be a priority except in comparison to other values or if there is an actual oil pressure problem.   Same thing for miss-fires or other problems, the MIL already signals the operator to an issue...   ...to the point about what one wants to see first, if there is a miss fire detected, I want to see miss fire counts or fuel trims first, if I have an oil pressure problem I want to see the oil pressure first. So, perhaps the 'systems' that are showing abnormalities are what gets displayed first.   I think your device is what connects at the OBD port, ease of use for the consumer, it could still have a 'pass-through' port for a second scanner, computer, etc.   Yes.   Based on my comment above, if an error appears, the report would be more specific to the system having an error.
    • Saturday 87 was 2.98 at the local meijer when I filled up my car with 93.
    • I like the idea.  I thought about putting a deposit a few years ago when they first dropped.  I still want to drive one and have inquired about doing this with them, like a ride and drive event they said they are coming but it hasnt happened even with them built in Indiana.  
    • That's a tough spot to be in, I personally would question spending 1/2 the book value on a repair vs. selling it as-is.    Presuming you own it out right, sell it for 10k and have a down payment for a replacement truck, or spend 10k on the one you already have...   I still think there is a cheaper transmission out there via recyclers, aftermarket or rebuild. (Cheaper than 5k for the unit)
    • Sadly, there's a drought of good 92-95 4.3 cars at junkyards in the area otherwise I would have gone fishing for parts. Not that they don't come up, there's just nothing good in the yards right now.   I tore into the intake yesterday evening, easier than I thought, and I might have this problem licked for cheap. Two of the intake studs came up with the bolt on removal, no big deal but that's why it looks funny with studs only on one side.   There's pooled gas on both sides of the plenum. Highlights boxed in green. Picture-right side has an obviously split pressure line from rubbing on the #5 injector nylon line. #5's line is worn in that spot but not all the way through. Passenger side intake (picture left), not sure, but I think the pressure regulator is hosed. Rebuilt spiders don't come with the pressure and return hoses so I'll need to replace those no matter what. A pressure regulator is $30 so I'll try that and if I end up having to swap the whole spider, it was $30. I'll be grinning ear to ear if that's all I need.   Parts arrive Tuesday.   Sure enough the shop was here before. That's a new gasket. Vacuum lines and wiring are a tangled mess, I sorted that out last night as well. Spent about an hour just picking up general slack and shoddy reassembly around the engine bay. Cheek-pokered the battery tray, got it all cleaned up. Sometimes things just need a little elbow grease and a few minutes of time to be right again.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...