Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Been a active member since 2004. I have read posts on GM- Trucks.com every day since and all my 48 years have been with GM vehicles for the most part. 

It's somewhat sad for me to tell you I've decided to try something else as for as a daily driver. I've had too many issues with GM pickup trucks since 2007. 

I had a '86, '94, '97, ' 98, '00, and '05 that were great trucks. Then I bought a 2007 GMC 1500 that ate front end parts and burned oil long and fuel sending units before I hit 100, 000 miles. 

Traded that for a 2011 1500 6.2 that I loved for the power but knocked and pinged like crazy every cold start to the point strangers looked at me like my truck was going to explode. Couldn't drive it until it warmed up a few minutes. 

Traded the that for a 2015 1500  NHT, 6.2 LTZ. 

 It was a love/ hate relationship for a few years but after needing a 3rd radiator, 4 rear axle seals, trans issues the entire time (8 speed) horrible shift issues, I decided to try a different brand. 

Picked up a 2019 Ram Rebel crew cab last week. 

I originally wanted a 6.2 Trail Boss but it was a hard find. 

So far I have to grudgingly admit that the Ram is way nicer. At least nicer than my 2015 LTZ. 

It's nicely optioned with the 5.7, E- torque, and a few things off- road oriented. 

First off, the 6.2 was a freaking rocket. It had a Lew tune along with light weight 18" wheels and tires and the thing would move out really well. Hands down the quickest truck I've owned and quicker than any truck that wanted to have a little go. 

The Ram 5.7 with E-torque has 530 lb ft of torque off the line but nowhere near as quick as the 6.2. 

The Ram feels much better driving though. Shifts are perfect, throttle response is almost too touchy, the thing just wants to accelerate hard where the Silverado was so lazy feeling until you floored it. 

I've had the Ram for a week now and so far it's really fun to drive.  Build quality seems decent and I'm hoping to have less issues but only time will tell. 

I'll really miss this site if I'm honest though. So strange to finally get to the point I'm so fed up with GM that I but a Dodge Lol. 

Who knows... Maybe I'll be back? 

There's some great people on here and I'll miss you guys! 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Never understood brand loyalists. If you aren't happy with the product go elsewhere.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Posted

You gotta do what you gotta do.  Most of the long timers around here I've seen go try other brands over the years.  Brand Loyalty is a joke now a days.  Keep us posted on how things work out with the Dodge, and congrats!

Posted

I always bought by the best price. I’ve driven Fords, Dodge and GM full size trucks. Only a few went pass 150K before trade in. Very few let me down. I didn’t sweat the small stuff. If they got me to my work site all was good. All got modified to an extent, some more than others. So I was price loyal. My favorite years were early to mid 2000s, GMs. After retirement I found a the clean old GM I drive now. The new trucks all are loaded down with too much junk to be problem free today. I’m sticking with the old stuff.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
18 hours ago, KARNUT said:

 My favorite years were early to mid 2000s, GMs. After retirement I found a the clean old GM I drive now. The new trucks all are loaded down with too much junk to be problem free today. I’m sticking with the old stuff.
 

I think I am partially with ya there.  I really liked my GMT-800s.  My 99 Silverado 1500 was my first GM Truck and it ran well despite issues with the rear diff blowing up at 70,000 miles and the fuel sending unit giving up at 100,000 miles (common issues back then) and my 05 Sierra 1500 was trouble free the entire time I had it. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Ain't nothing wrong with that. I would have gotten a Warlock in Mojave Sand if I could have found one close by me. 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 8/17/2020 at 1:23 AM, Colossus said:

I think I am partially with ya there.  I really liked my GMT-800s.  My 99 Silverado 1500 was my first GM Truck and it ran well despite issues with the rear diff blowing up at 70,000 miles and the fuel sending unit giving up at 100,000 miles (common issues back then) and my 05 Sierra 1500 was trouble free the entire time I had it. 

Me too.  I liked my 2000 Silverado so much I kept it even when I bought my newer trucks.

Now it's my son's (except I borrow it all the time)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,881 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...