Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I used it for a couple minutes on a trail in PA just to see what it was like. Just felt lot of engine braking and the system electronically applying the brakes when not touching the gas. Going less than 5 miles per hour, and letting off the gas, it brings you to a stop pretty fast. Not sure it's much more useful than 4 high, but I didn't use it in any type of terrain that would warrant 4 low, or this new mode made to mimic it, so I can't speak to that. Just wanted to see what it did. From reading, it's supposed to mimic the gearing, shift points, and "crawl" effect of 4 low, but with none of the torque benefits of a true 4 low system.

Posted

Yeah same here. I tried it on a dirt road and it has some cool tricks but I just wonder if it can handle light trails especially going up or downhill. I wish someone like TFL Truck would take one off road just to see how it does lol. I don't think the torque should be a problem since these trucks already have way more torque than a lot of older trucks that did fine off road. I just worry about the transmission or brakes over heating going up and down hills.

Posted (edited)

Agreed. Might be worth sending the TFL guys an email to see if they can get access to a single speed transfer case truck to do some testing. 

 

EDIT: I sent the TFL guys an email to see if they'd be interested in doing this kind of review for us.

Edited by c.schill
Posted

Funny enough, I emailed TFL last Nov asking about the Terrain Mode and having them test it.  They said they tested it and it's pretty basic.  Advised me to just get 4lo if I can afford it.  I found the video in which they gave it a whirl.  Not much of a test.  Just a quick demo of what it was.  I'll try to find the video again.  I wish they did a full review of it going over some of their usual off-road challenges.

Posted

Funny this question is being asked. I was just looking into offroad trails in San Diego to take my truck on

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
3 hours ago, SilveradoRST said:

Funny enough, I emailed TFL last Nov asking about the Terrain Mode and having them test it.  They said they tested it and it's pretty basic.  Advised me to just get 4lo if I can afford it.  I found the video in which they gave it a whirl.  Not much of a test.  Just a quick demo of what it was.  I'll try to find the video again.  I wish they did a full review of it going over some of their usual off-road challenges.

I didn't know they'd done anything with it yet, that's promising I suppose. In my email, I asked specifically if they would consider doing a full offroad test on some low difficulty trails/terrain with a Silverado or Sierra with this single speed transfer case. It would be interesting to see them take one on a low difficulty trail out there. I think it's Tombstone hill, they call it, that they test a lot of things on. That would be a pretty decent test scenario.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, c.schill said:

I didn't know they'd done anything with it yet, that's promising I suppose. In my email, I asked specifically if they would consider doing a full offroad test on some low difficulty trails/terrain with a Silverado or Sierra with this single speed transfer case. It would be interesting to see them take one on a low difficulty trail out there. I think it's Tombstone hill, they call it, that they test a lot of things on. That would be a pretty decent test scenario.

I'm with you.  Hope they do it.

Posted

This is from GMC’s website. It seems like it could be promising but no way to know unless it’s actually tested:


Terrain Mode is designed for use in low-speed off-road driving and helps replicate the control of a traditional low-range four-wheel drive gearing. Additionally, it works to assist the driver on very technical terrain, where precise vehicle control is essential.

“Our goal with Terrain Mode was to assist the driver, but to ensure they didn’t feel isolated from the off-roading experience,” says Creehan. ”We wanted Terrain Mode’s functionality to feel natural – and above all, be enjoyable.”

In order to select Terrain Mode, the transfer case must be in four-wheel drive (4 High). A unique transmission calibration helps leverage as much engine braking as possible. Like Snow Mode, the accelerator pedal is tuned to respond slowly, allowing for a more precise application of throttle – important when trying to regulate wheelspin when climbing uneven surfaces – while Start/Stop is disabled to avoid any interruption when slowly traveling over rough terrain.

Terrain Mode also employs advanced brake-based controls to not only modulate torque across axles – important on loose or uneven surfaces – but it can also work along with engine braking to help regulate speed, especially when travelling slowly downhill.

At speeds between 10-25 mph, Terrain Mode will slow the vehicle to a creep speed, much like low-range gearing would in a two-speed transfer case. In the case of more challenging situations – like traversing small boulders or logs – the driver can manually shift the transmission into first or second gear (L1 and L2). In this case, the brake system will work to bring the truck to a full stop if the driver removes his or her foot from the accelerator.

Terrain Mode can also leverage an advanced form of Hill Start Assist, which helps hold the brakes under certain conditions while the driver shifts his or her foot from the brake pedal to the accelerator, helping prevent Sierra from moving during the transition, especially while driving through rocky terrain or steep paths.


The part about modulating torque across axles sounds particularly interesting. Sounds like the computer doing left foot braking for you to help with traction


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted



This is from GMC’s website. It seems like it could be promising but no way to know unless it’s actually tested:


Terrain Mode is designed for use in low-speed off-road driving and helps replicate the control of a traditional low-range four-wheel drive gearing. Additionally, it works to assist the driver on very technical terrain, where precise vehicle control is essential.

“Our goal with Terrain Mode was to assist the driver, but to ensure they didn’t feel isolated from the off-roading experience,” says Creehan. ”We wanted Terrain Mode’s functionality to feel natural – and above all, be enjoyable.”

In order to select Terrain Mode, the transfer case must be in four-wheel drive (4 High). A unique transmission calibration helps leverage as much engine braking as possible. Like Snow Mode, the accelerator pedal is tuned to respond slowly, allowing for a more precise application of throttle – important when trying to regulate wheelspin when climbing uneven surfaces – while Start/Stop is disabled to avoid any interruption when slowly traveling over rough terrain.

Terrain Mode also employs advanced brake-based controls to not only modulate torque across axles – important on loose or uneven surfaces – but it can also work along with engine braking to help regulate speed, especially when travelling slowly downhill.

At speeds between 10-25 mph, Terrain Mode will slow the vehicle to a creep speed, much like low-range gearing would in a two-speed transfer case. In the case of more challenging situations – like traversing small boulders or logs – the driver can manually shift the transmission into first or second gear (L1 and L2). In this case, the brake system will work to bring the truck to a full stop if the driver removes his or her foot from the accelerator.

Terrain Mode can also leverage an advanced form of Hill Start Assist, which helps hold the brakes under certain conditions while the driver shifts his or her foot from the brake pedal to the accelerator, helping prevent Sierra from moving during the transition, especially while driving through rocky terrain or steep paths.


The part about modulating torque across axles sounds particularly interesting. Sounds like the computer doing left foot braking for you to help with traction


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


It also sounds like they are utilizing what's known as a retarder when they say, "A unique transmission calibration helps leverage as much engine braking as possible.". A retarder works in the transmission to create the affect of engine breaking, but doesn't create the loud noise diesel engines are known for when an engine brake, aka jake brake, is utilized. GM has been manufacturing retarders for decades, mostly in commercial busses made by Gillig. Anybody that has experience driving a Gillig bus (Low Floor or Phantom) can tell you retarders can make for bad situations in slick conditions like snow or ice. As long as there's grip it'll be okay to use, but a retarder can take a slick situation and make it worse.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

Got a reply from TFL this morning. Here's what they said...

 

Hi Chris,

Thanks for the note. Our ability to test trucks is limited to the models that manufacturers supply to us. Since they know we take anything with AWD/4WD off-road as part of our reviews, we nearly always get the Z71/Trail Boss versions of trucks to review. So it's not a matter of would we, but can we.

Still, if a 4x4 Silverado that's not a Z71 or Trail Boss comes our way, we'll run it off-road. Count on it.

Best,

Grant

 

So sounds like they don't really get a choice in what GM sends them to use for testing.

Posted

guess we are going to have to wait until some brave soul out there decides to take one out on a more rigorous trail lol

  • 7 months later...
Posted
On 10/5/2020 at 3:56 PM, SilveradoRST said:

Funny enough, I emailed TFL last Nov asking about the Terrain Mode and having them test it.  They said they tested it and it's pretty basic.  Advised me to just get 4lo if I can afford it.  I found the video in which they gave it a whirl.  Not much of a test.  Just a quick demo of what it was.  I'll try to find the video again.  I wish they did a full review of it going over some of their usual off-road challenges.

I got 2020 gmc sierra with single speed if anyone makes a video of your 2 speed doing anything I'll do it in my single speed I ain't scared

  • Like 1
Posted

Interesting about the "Retarder", I was unfamiliar with the term but I understood there had to be something to limit the transmission other than brake application.  Always fun when you learn something new, now to go research it :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 534 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...