Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I don't think they designed to drain out.  According to the photos they are designed similar to the WeatherTech mats, tray like, and collect water.

 

Installed the Revolver 2 bed cover today.  It's nice and I like it but it took a little bit to adjust it correctly.  I also put in a bed mat because I don't like messing up the spray in liner.  The cheap console tray also arrived and fits perfectly, I doubt the OEM version is any better at three times the cost.

 

Windows are tinted as well. I am getting there.

Edited by 71_340
  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, 71_340 said:

I don't think they designed to drain out.  According to the photos they are designed similar to the WeatherTech mats, tray like, and collect water.

 

Installed the Revolver 2 bed cover today.  It's nice and I like it but it took a little bit to adjust it correctly.  I also put in a bed mat because I don't like messing up the spray in liner.  The cheap console tray also arrived and fits perfectly, I doubt the OEM version is any better at three times the cost.

 

Windows are tinted as well. I am getting there.

Which bed mat did you get and how is it?  That's my next item as the spray in liner is slippery to say the least, need some grip.  I got the Amazon console tray too...$20 bucks, can't beat it.

Posted (edited)
On 12/16/2020 at 1:22 PM, SPASierra said:

Husky goes all the way to the door sills.  Love them!

Current GM HD ones overlap the sills so no carpet is exposed. 

 

I don't believe they will drain out --- but might overflow out.

 

 

Edited by redwngr
  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/17/2020 at 11:42 AM, OliverDennis52 said:

Which bed mat did you get and how is it?  That's my next item as the spray in liner is slippery to say the least, need some grip.  I got the Amazon console tray too...$20 bucks, can't beat it.

2021 GMC Sierra 1500 Gator Rubber Truck Bed Mat | RealTruck

 

Cheapest one I could find.  It fits well with no trimming required, just needs to flatten out a bit at the end.  It arrived rolled up, it is cold here so it will take a little while.  As far as quality is concerned, I can't see the difference between this one and OEM ones I had before.

Posted
On 12/17/2020 at 2:49 PM, redwngr said:

Current GM HD ones overlap the sills so no carpet is exposed. 

 

I don't believe they will drain out --- but might overflow out.

 

 

The Lasfit mats just arrived and I put them in.  I think they fit very well (see photos) and are well made.  All mats have snap in retainers, although my truck has the corresponding plastic studs on the driver side only.  I had Weatertech and OEM mats before, they were also good but theses are just as good at half the cost and the rubber compound id not slippery.

Front.jpg

Rear.jpg

Posted
20 hours ago, 71_340 said:

The Lasfit mats just arrived and I put them in.  I think they fit very well (see photos) and are well made.  All mats have snap in retainers, although my truck has the corresponding plastic studs on the driver side only.  I had Weatertech and OEM mats before, they were also good but theses are just as good at half the cost and the rubber compound id not slippery.

Front.jpg

Rear.jpg

Those look very well made!  I like the looks of them too. Good find. Have a great Christmas!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...