Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Offset/Offset or Offset/Center? 5x11 case? (I think magnaflow makes a 5x8 as well).

 

Was doin some dig'n, there is a enough room on the tail pipe (where it starts down after coming over the axle) for about a 9" resonator. I may go that route. Was looking at this one.

Posted

Apparently, the Vibrant Ultra Quiet comes highly recommend across the web. 

 

Also, proper placement is between the muffler and cats from what I've read. After muffler at the tail pipe does nothing for the drone reduction goal.

  • Like 1
Posted

From Vibrant on a Summit review:

 

"

• Size. The general rule of thumb with Vibrant resonators/mufflers is that the larger the body of the device, the more effective it will be at reducing decibel levels, drone, rasp, etc. Larger volume of packing = more harmonic wave absorption. Aside from the volume of packing material making it more effective, is the shape. This is also part of the reason that the Ultra Quiet is a popular choice over bottle style resonators or round body mufflers. Each time your exhaust valve opens, an exhaust pulse wave travels down your exhaust stream. It bounces in all directions as it moves through the exhaust system. The frequency can be affected by the shape, size and length of chambers, tubing, etc. When the pulse wave meets a suppressive device with packing material, it is dampened as it travels through the perforated core, into the packing material, reflects off the outside wall and back through the packing material to rejoin the exhaust system. In a round suppressive device, the distance for the pulse wave to travel from core to outer body is uniform, compared to the Ultra Quiet resonator which has an oval shape with variable distances for the pulse wave to travel through. This makes it more effective at attenuating a broad spectrum of frequencies of the exhaust note. The same principle applies to a chambered suppressive device but placement becomes very important because the lack of packing material removes the ability to dampen vibration as the pulse wave travels through the chambers. They rely only on pulse wave reflection to cancel out frequencies. Also, keep in mind that a larger diameter tube can lead to an increase in drone/resonance since there is a larger underdamped surface area that can cause the sound waves to amplify.
Placement. This also plays a key role in regards to reducing exhaust drone. For most applications we recommend placement of a resonator in the area under the front seats of the vehicle. Targeting this placement will be effective for drone frequencies that are exhibited at low to mid-range steady state throttle/engine load conditions (ie: highway driving). In many applications the room available for a resonator in this area is limited, so smaller body “bottle style” resonators are often employed. Installing a resonator in this area will help prevent that drone frequency from reverberating through the floor and into the passenger cabin. Keeping the resonator further upstream also benefits in cancelling out that drone frequency earlier in the system, preventing it from travelling the full length of your exhaust. Placement will be dependent upon available space as well and is often the most limiting factor for installation. Placement further downstream in the exhaust path will target higher RPM frequencies and overall decibel reduction. This is typical placement for most larger body mufflers. Use your best judgement in identifying where any drone is occurring, in some cases, resonance frequencies can be at their peak further downstream just ahead of the rear axle of the vehicle, this will be a drone emitting from the rear seat area. Target placement in the area where you identify any unwanted frequency is occurring.
• Spacing. When you have a long length of exhaust tubing (more than 5’) without a suppression device, there is an opportunity for exhaust valve pulse wave resonance frequencies to be amplified- much the same way if you were to strike 2 tuning forks that are different lengths- the longer fork will have a larger amplitude. Your exhaust tubing behaves the same way with the pulse wave sent down from the exhaust valve smashing open and closed at incredible speeds- the longer the length without a suppressive device, the more opportunity for a drone frequency to be amplified. For this reason, it is also ideal to try to prevent placement of resonators and or mufflers too close together so they remain most effective across the length of the system.

All Vibrant resonators and mufflers feature a straight through perforated stainless core design to minimize flow disruption of the exhaust. They are not flow directional.
Inlet/outlets are sized by the inside diameter. This means the exhaust tubing will slip inside the resonator/muffler neck and a lap joint weld will be made on each end to install it.
If you have any other questions, please feel free to email us. Thank you for choosing Vibrant, [email protected]

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have a Gibson single exit kit on order, supposed to ship around the 3rd (tomorrow).I’ll share my experience post install.

Posted

Put the Vibrant on.

 

Did the trick. Pretty much stock silent inside at very low throttle cruise. No blaring drone through the range, just mellow exhaust tone now. You can hear it has a muffler on it but it canceled out that specific bass frequency that was driving me nuts. Made no change to the exterior tone or volume, still sounds mellow and moderate like it did before.

  • Like 3
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I’d like to have had some feedback on the Gibson cat back I have on order but that have yet ship it out .Gibson says they had been waiting on material, then were waiting on fabrication..been weeks.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Finally got the kit on, sounds great, zero drone.It is for a longbed and does require a cut and relocation of one hanger if you are fitting to a short box.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Jumping back into this thread.   I put an MBRP 4" stainless system on my 2024 3500HD gasser last July. Overall I was happy with it although it was a little louder than I anticipated. It did quiet down a lot at cruising speeds so I was okay with it. We took one short trip in late summer towing the fifth wheel. It was a little louder than I wanted but not bad at cruising speeds of 60-65 in 8th gear (2050 RPM) Of course this was in Indiana and there werent a lot of grades to pull. 

Fast forward to a trip to Florida this winter. After returning I had decided that if I was going to keep the truck I would re-install the stock system because the MBRP became a nuisance in the hills. Once it hits 2400 rpm (common with the gas engine) the noise is too loud, after an entire day it becomes tiring. 

I ended up selling the truck after we got home and included the stock system with the truck so the new owner could decide for themselves if it was right for him. I was very open about my feelings on it.  

Around town I loved it and it sounded great, for towing I would definitely avoid it. 

This was an expensive and time consuming lesson for me. 

Edited by 64BAwagon
  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, 64BAwagon said:

Jumping back into this thread.   I put an MBRP 4" stainless system on my 2024 3500HD gasser last July. Overall I was happy with it although it was a little louder than I anticipated. It did quiet down a lot at cruising speeds so I was okay with it. We took one short trip in late summer towing the fifth wheel. It was a little louder than I wanted but not bad at cruising speeds of 60-65 in 8th gear (2050 RPM) Of course this was in Indiana and there werent a lot of grades to pull. 

Fast forward to a trip to Florida this winter. After returning I had decided that if I was going to keep the truck I would re-install the stock system because the MBRP became a nuisance in the hills. Once it hits 2400 rpm (common with the gas engine) the noise is too loud, after an entire day it becomes tiring. 

I ended up selling the truck after we got home and included the stock system with the truck so the new owner could decide for themselves if it was right for him. I was very open about my feelings on it.  

Around town I loved it and it sounded great, for towing I would definitely avoid it. 

This was an expensive and time consuming lesson for me. 

That seems to be the theme with aftermarket exhaust systems, a more compact muffler and may be really nicely made depending on the company and made from the top grade 304 stainless if its a Borla for example, but the noise is what turns me away from the idea. Of course here in Canada the price seems to be insane as well and certainly if its the genuine GM Borla system for example. I haven't heard it but I have a nephew with a 2013 Ram 3/4 with the 6.4 hemi and he had put a MBRP 4" on and my niece made a comment "I don't like it, its way too loud", and that more than likely is when they would be towing their holiday trailer or when hauling sleds on the deck to the mountains. That all takes power which means throttle input and rpm, none of which is quiet with an inherently loud system. I believe his is a 409 stainless.

 

So which grade of stainless steel is yours, is it the 304 stainless as I don't happen to see a 409 stainless for that model, only the least expensive aluminized steel.

Posted

Yes, unfortunately that money has sailed, although your buyer may have liked the fact it had a stainless steel exhaust but sadly add on's rarely pay back well on vehicles.

 

I will admit I am curious though what prompted the sale and purchase of a new truck since they are only one year apart and I've assumed very little change in these two model years ( possibly some minor internal changes ). I don't mean to put you on the spot and you certainly don't have to quantify the new purchase but none the less it has peaked my curiosity !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...