Jump to content

2500HD 6.0L exhaust modifications


Recommended Posts

Posted

I just came from my local exhaust dealer and he showed me what Chevy has been installing in the 6.0's. As you know, the exhaust consists of dual 3" pipes with dual cats entering the muffler which LOOKS like two-in and two-out, right? Look closer, you only have one-out as the other is only a resonator and does not actually exhaust out of the muffler. Also in the in side, the 3" pipes are reduced to 1 7/8" inside the muffler. He is proposing to junk the stock muffler and install two turbo-type mufflers leaving the stock 3 1/2" tail pipe. I want to keep the single tail pipe for $$ reasons. He has done this conversion to several 6.0's before and has dyno figures showing a 20-30HP gain. He chargers $180 for installing the two ss mufflers.

 

So, what do you all think, is this a good idea? Will if hurt my torque output? Is it worthwhile? :rolleyes:

Posted

Nope, that was one of the best mods you can do for the 6.0! The stock exhasut is restrictive. Put duals on and dont look back. If your worried about low end run a single tailpipe. I have true duals and lost very little if any low end.

Posted

Did the guy at the exhaust shop know if any of the conversions from the stock muffler lost any low end torque? What mufflers did he use? Is there much in-cab resonance? I like the idea of using the stock tailpipe. I have noticed that flowmaster offers a kit that replaces the stock muffler and tailpipe with the same style factory set-up. Would'nt want to change the stock exhaust at the expense of in-cab noise or loss of power. However, a meaner sound would be nice!

Posted

A flowmaster will resonate. A 50 series is a better choice. Only resosnates at certian rpms. I have heard and rode in a HD with Magnaflow mufflers and it sounded great!! If I re-do my exhaust again, it will be with magnaflows.

Posted
Did the guy at the exhaust shop know if any of the conversions from the stock muffler lost any low end torque? What mufflers did he use?

 

No he didn't, and that what makes me suspicious....he only had HP numbers. I pull a 5th wheel camper in season, and would NOT want to lose any torque, and when pulling, I am not that concerned with mileage. I just want a little more towing power.

 

The mufflers he suggests are a generic, turbo muffler made of stainless steel. Am not sure of brand. He stated that the system would be somewhat more noisy, and I can live with that, but would not want it too loud. I know some of you guys dig the decibels, but that's not my style.

Posted

1BADHD

 

Were the magnaflows installed using the stock tailpipe? Any idea which magnaflows? I'm not sure that I have ever heard magnafow muffler. Do they sound anything like a flowmaster? Thanks

Posted

They didnt use the stock tailpipe, but did have a single 4" outlet. I think they were the Magnaflow XL's. They dont sound like a Flow. They are more rumbly and deep. Dont have that tinny echo. Kinda hard to explain.

Posted

I've been wrestling with this situation for some time now. My exhaust shop told me the 6.0 needs a certain amount of back presure to operate at peak efficiency at lower rpm. They recommended a dual in, single out SS Magnaflow, part # 14590 for this motor. I had it installed about 3 months back and loved it except for the resonance below 2000 rpm, especially under load. I called Flowmaster to ask about their series 50 muffler that was designed for the 6.0 & 8.1 engines only, and was informed by their tech support that they have pulled it from inventory since there have been too many complaints about it being too loud, and to check back next year sometime for something new. Back to my exhaust shop, the owner felt bad about my $189.00 Magnaflow not sounding the way I want, so we welded in two small 12" long resonators just ahead of the muffler, they look like small glasspacks. This toned it down slightly and took the edge off of the "droning" at low rpm, above 2000 rpm it is deep and throaty, but not tooo loud. Hope this helps.

Posted

I replaced the stock muffler with a dual in-dual out Dynomax Ultraflow muffler, keeping the rest of the exhaust system stock and it was unbearably loud. The resonance was incredible, it vibrated the floorboard. It didn't sound good at all. I had them weld the stock muffler back on.

 

If the muffler shop is recommending two mufflers, that might be a better idea. Make sure it's not a straight-through muffler though because you might have similar problems to what I experienced.

Posted
If the muffler shop is recommending two mufflers, that might be a better idea. Make sure it's not a straight-through muffler though because you might have similar problems to what I experienced

 

This is EXACTLY the problem I am trying to address....too much noise vs. enough back pressure to maintaine torque. The dealer recomended two "turbo" mufflers which are baffled, creating SOME back pressure. He refused to recomend straight-through mufflers for the above reason. He wants to hook the mufflers into the stick tail pipe which is 3 1/2"& stainless. I am not a kid any more, and don't want it too loud, and I can't afford to replace everything and start new.

 

I see a lot of controversy when it comes to exhaust systems. Some want it loud and louder no matter what. I just want to get some more power for towing. Others want it super quiet. There has to be a compromise somewhere. If anybody has a solution, not just something they use because it's cool, let me know. :rolleyes:

Posted

I have dual 50 series Flowmasters...they added some performance but, I am seriously thinking about changing to Magnaflows. The Flow masters are just too loud and they don't seem to give me the deep sound that I would like to hear from a 6.0L. They are kinda hollow sounding and get quite annoying at certain rpms. I have heard the Magnaflows and the sound great.

Posted

20-30hp seems a little high for replacing the stock muffler. You see those numbers from long tube headers. Replacing the catback is usually good for about 10 maybe 12 horsepower. I just wrote about this in the last thread so you guys are going to think I'm a walking Corsa advertisement :rolleyes: I used to like aftermarket exhausts that could be heard before the car/truck was even seen. Now I like systems that are fairly quiet but still produce results. The Corsa exhausts are like having two different systems at the same time. They are pretty mello with limited to no interior resonance. You can hear a slight deeper exhaust sound while cruising down the highway but it's not loud at all. When the gas pedal goes to the floor it's a while different story. The system comes to life and lets people your that your truck isn't stock. This pretty much gives you the best of both worlds. They've recently added alot of new systems to the GM line-up so must truck configurations are now covered.

 

B&B TriFlo also makes a nice system. They also don't have to much in the way of interior resonance but I'd say they are a little bit louder during normal driving. Not to loud for a daily driver though.

 

Tom

 

02silveradonew2small.jpg02suburban22sm.jpg

 

2002 8.1 Silverado HD - Comp Cam, TOGs headers, Volant induction, Direct Hits ignition, 8" lift 18" wheels/tires + more

2002 8.1 Suburban -Intercooled Whipple supercharger, TOGs headers, Volant induction, 22" wheels/tires + more - 407hp/558 ft-lb torque at the rear wheels.

 

www.tbyrnemotorsports.com

Posted

I've got the 6.0 with 50 series flowmasters. The sound is bada$$. It's not too loud. Sometimes I wish it was a little louder. I have no resonence. That may be because I only have a regular cab. I also didn't notice an increase or decrease in power.

Posted

When I first got my 6.0 in 2001 the first thing I did was take it to the muffler shop and I had them cut all the stock pipe off just short of the two cats. From there I ran 2 2.5 inch pipes straight out the back into a 4 inch tips. Let me tell you this was one mean sounding Devil but, the cops did not like it as much as I did and I had to take it off. I decided just to put my stock exhaust back on. I can tell you that there is a difference on the interstate with the muffler. The back pressure provides considerable low end torque which I lost when I had the duals on. The true dual exhaust however seemed to run better at higher RPM's than the stock exhaust. One thing I will tell you for sure run the exhaust out the side I know a guy who has a 5th wheel camper and he took it on vacation and the noise from where the exhaust bounced off the camper from his straight pipes drove him crazy

Posted

I'm in pretty good with a guy that owns a muffler shop. We cut off the stock muffler off my 6.0 and put a 30" glass pack on each side with 2 1/4 pipe straight out the back with 4" echo chambers. It sounds great! It has that deep dualed out tone without the really loud pop. I was up and down the interstate this weekend and there was no resonance, and I couldn't feel any torque loss but it does seem to pull harder at the higher rpms.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,847
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    FiLo
    Newest Member
    FiLo
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 654 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • sorry to bump an old thread, im a bit clueless with this stuff, would these fit a 2019+ Silverado? https://wiperpro.com.au/products/chevrolet-silverado-wiper-blades mainly wondering if the beam shape stays planted at highway speed, thats what seems to let the factory ones down imo
    • I have a 2018 Silverado Custom with 156k on the odometer. In the last month I've replaced the plugs, wires and the driver side engine mount. My wife just returned from a trip of about 1500 miles and told me the brakes are making a grinding noise when applied. I drove it and looked it over and this is what I found with the driver's side rear rotor.   I'm going to order new pads and check about having the rotor resurfaced. Hopefully this is easier than the last 2 jobs.   Peace  
    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...