Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Adamace1 said:

Screenshot_20210601-211116_Office Mobile.jpg

 

 

That bulletin is from 2015, it concerns the 3.6 V6 engines, and is telling us dealers to use the longer 63 filter in place of the 64 filter that was used during engine assembly due to there being clearance issues at the engine assembly plant.

It doesn't concern any of the V8 engines, and the part number listed, 19330000, has been changed to 12707246.

  • Like 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, MS3DALE said:

 

 

That bulletin is from 2015, it concerns the 3.6 V6 engines, and is telling us dealers to use the longer 63 filter in place of the 64 filter that was used during engine assembly due to there being clearance issues at the engine assembly plant.

It doesn't concern any of the V8 engines, and the part number listed, 19330000, has been changed to 12707246.

Right, I just spent 4 years with dealers knowing nothing about what filter I should use on my 2017 impala. Because of that I don't trust them saying again to use a different filter than my 2021 silverado owners manual says. 

Posted
54 minutes ago, MS3DALE said:

The PF63E has been replaced by the PF63, same with most of the other filters (IE- PF64E is now PF64) GM has dropped the "E" designation, the design is the same.

I personally run a UPF63R on my 2015 Silverado 6.2 (As well as a UPF64R on my '18 Cruze and a UPF48R on my '11 Camaro SS)

Ok. I really wish acdelco and GM would put out some info so it's not so confusing. It's just stupid of them to give me an owners manual that's 3 months old with part numbers that are to parts that are no longer made. He'll they could just print on the side of the box that it's a pf63 filter and a true replacement for the pf63e. I would think that would cost nothing to do. Thanks for your info, the 3 dealers I visited just told me " that's what they use and that's what they carry and they cold order the e version if I wanted it." Some kind of print out they could hand to me explaining what you said would be great.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Adamace1 said:

Right, I just spent 4 years with dealers knowing nothing about what filter I should use on my 2017 impala. Because of that I don't trust them saying again to use a different filter than my 2021 silverado owners manual says. 

Well if your 2017 Impala is a 3.6 V6, it uses the newest 63.....GM part# 12707246

Posted
2 minutes ago, Adamace1 said:

Ok. I really wish acdelco and GM would put out some info so it's not so confusing. It's just stupid of them to give me an owners manual that's 3 months old with part numbers that are to parts that are no longer made. He'll they could just print on the side of the box that it's a pf63 filter and a true replacement for the pf63e. I would think that would cost nothing to do. Thanks for your info, the 3 dealers I visited just told me " that's what they use and that's what they carry and they cold order the e version if I wanted it." Some kind of print out they could hand to me explaining what you said would be great.

 

You have to understand, that owners manual is more than 3 months old, it may have been printed a year ago, its not as updated as our database is from GM, part numbers change all the time, lord knows I've seen numbers change many many times in my 30+ years in the GM parts business (about the only part number that hasn't changed is GM's optikleen windshield washer solvent! 1051515)......other than that every number has changed over the years, and they can't reprint and send out new owners manuals everytime the part numbers change, but I understand your frustration, anyway the newest number is the PF63 / 12707246 for your truck, or as I said I use on mine you could use the UPF63R Ultraguard Gold filter.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, MS3DALE said:

 

You have to understand, that owners manual is more than 3 months old, it may have been printed a year ago, its not as updated as our database is from GM, part numbers change all the time, lord knows I've seen numbers change many many times in my 30+ years in the GM parts business (about the only part number that hasn't changed is GM's optikleen windshield washer solvent! 1051515)......other than that every number has changed over the years, and they can't reprint and send out new owners manuals everytime the part numbers change, but I understand your frustration, anyway the newest number is the PF63 / 12707246 for your truck, or as I said I use on mine you could use the UPF63R Ultraguard Gold filter.

 

Okay I just looked up the GM 12707246 as a cross reference for a WIX and got a match for the WL10255 which has a 22 psi bypass spring. Same as the old PF63E.

 

Then I cross referenced a UPF63R and got WIX WL10412 which as a, ready for this? A 36 psi bypass spring!!

 

Lastly I cross referenced the PF 63 and guess what, WL10255. This use to cross to a WIX 57045 with the 12-15 psi bypass once upon a time.  

 

 

 

I have the WIX PDF for this update but it is routed through my PC so will not share that file in forum. 

 

So....here's the 411 on this cluster ****. GM is once again using the superseded (old and origianl part number), PF63 to replace a newer but no defunct part number PF63E while KEEPING the 22 PSI bypass spring.

 

They must feel confident that ALL NOS PF63 filters with the older 12 psi spring have been purged from EVERYONES stores

 

Purolator PL22500 is the cross for the CURRENT ACDelco PF63 and FORMER PF63E 22 PSI bypass

Purolator PL22500 is the cross for the OLD/CURRENT WIX 57045 and OLD PF63 but keeps the 22 psi bypass

Purolator PL21495 is the cross for the CURRENT ACDELCO UPF63R. 36 psi bypass. 

WIX 57045 is the CURRENT and OLD cross for the FIRST USE of the PF63 ACDelco. 12-15 PSI bypass. Purolator no longer carries a 12 psi version of this filter. 

 

Bottom Line: No matter what is printied on the box or in the manual the CURRENT bypass spring is 22 PSI. Use a Purolator and end this madness. 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted

 

Going to pick up a Purolator or Wix replacement with the 22 psi bypass today.

The parts store near my job should have one or the other.

 

What a confusing mess.  

I appreciate everyone helping shed some light on the different twists and turns of the apparently “new” PF63 (GM 12707246).

 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, 5of45 said:

 

Going to pick up a Purolator or Wix replacement with the 22 psi bypass today.

The parts store near my job should have one or the other.

 

What a confusing mess.  

I appreciate everyone helping shed some light on the different twists and turns of the apparently “new” PF63 (GM 12707246).

 

 

Not confusing at all, just use the 12707246 and you'll be fine.

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, MS3DALE said:

 

You have to understand, that owners manual is more than 3 months old, it may have been printed a year ago, its not as updated as our database is from GM, part numbers change all the time, lord knows I've seen numbers change many many times in my 30+ years in the GM parts business (about the only part number that hasn't changed is GM's optikleen windshield washer solvent! 1051515)......other than that every number has changed over the years, and they can't reprint and send out new owners manuals everytime the part numbers change, but I understand your frustration, anyway the newest number is the PF63 / 12707246 for your truck, or as I said I use on mine you could use the UPF63R Ultraguard Gold filter.

Yea. I wish I meet you in the parts department instead of someone saying I don't know. This is what we use. I pretty sure I use the UPF63R in our 2020 blazer 3.6. I would like to use that filter in my 5.3 silverado. GM makes it so confusing I just use whats in the manual so there's not reason for a warranty claim to be denied. I wish I could see a statement from GM saying what filters I can use.

Edited by Adamace1
Posted
2 hours ago, Adamace1 said:

Yea. I wish I meet you in the parts department instead of someone saying I don't know. This is what we use. I pretty sure I use the UPF63R in our 2020 blazer 3.6. I would like to use that filter in my 5.3 silverado. GM makes it so confusing I just use whats in the manual so there's not reason for a warranty claim to be denied. I wish I could see a statement from GM saying what filters I can use.

 

Yes, GM actually requires the use of the UPF63R in the 3.6 Blazer (as well as some other 3.6 applications such as the Camaro) due to the higher oil pressure.

You would be fine to use it in your Silverado, its actually listed in the parts catalog as an optional service replacement.

Posted
 
 
Document ID: 5663685
#20-NA-213: Information on Improved Oil Filter Gasket Design for Spin-On Oil Filters PF63 PF64 and PF48 - (Oct 30, 2020)
Subject:  Information on Improved Oil Filter Gasket Design for Spin-On Oil Filters PF63 PF64 and PF48

 

999999995.gif

Brand:

Model:

Model Year:

VIN:

Engine:

Transmission:

from

to

from

to

Buick

GM Passenger Cars and Trucks

2011

2020

Engines that use a PF63, PF64 and PF48 oil filter

Cadillac

Chevrolet

GMC

 

 

 

Information

Starting October 1, 2020 replacement spin-on oil filters PF63, PF48 and PF64 will come with a new improved gasket design to help retain it to the oil filter body and eliminate the possibility of the gasket from falling off during installation. The gasket width was increased to help retain the gasket to the filter body.

Existing dealer inventory or filters received from CCA are ok to use for service. When replacing an oil filter, always ensure that the gasket is seated properly in the filter body. These filters meet all GM OE specifications and are approved for service usage.

Today's engines have very tight tolerances, multiple oil pressure control systems and high flow lubrication system requirements. These requirements will vary based on the specific engine design, so the proper match of oil filter to the engine application is very important.

Parts Information

Refer to the Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine the proper part number for your specific application.

Version

1

Modified

Released October 30, 2020

GM bulletins are intended for use by professional technicians, NOT a "do-it-yourselfer".  They are written to inform these technicians of conditions that may occur on some vehicles, or to provide information that could assist in the proper service of a vehicle.  Properly trained technicians have the equipment, tools, safety instructions, and know-how to do a job properly and safely.  If a condition is described, DO NOT assume that the bulletin applies to your vehicle, or that your vehicle will have that condition.  See your GM dealer for information on whether your vehicle may benefit from the information.

999999994.gif

WE SUPPORT VOLUNTARY TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION

 
© 2021 General Motors.  All rights reserved.
Posted
 
 
Document ID: 5222817
#19-NA-020: Information on Improved Replacement Spin-On Oil Filter UPF63R for High Feature V6 Engines - (Sep 11, 2020)
Subject:  Information on Improved Replacement Spin-On Oil Filter UPF63R for High Feature V6 Engines

 

999999995.gif

Brand:

Model:

Model Year:

VIN:

Engine:

Transmission:

from

to

from

to

Buick

LaCrosse

2017

2021

3.6L (LGX)

3.0L (LGW)

Regal

2018

Cadillac

ATS

2016

2019

CT6

2016

2020

CTS

2016

2019

XT5

2017

2021

XT6

2020

Chevrolet

Blazer

2019

Camaro

2016

GMC

Acadia

2017

 

 

 

Information

Today's engines have very tight tolerances, multiple oil pressure control systems and high flow lubrication system requirements. These requirements will vary based on the specific engine design, so the proper match of oil filter to the engine application is more important than it has ever been in the past.

The High Feature V-6 engines RPO (LGX) and (LGW) have higher oil pump pressure to accommodate engine cam phasing and high-speed bearing requirements. As a result, the oil filter performance was improved to meet this higher oil pressure output.

The new UPF63R oil filter has a thicker outer shell to provide higher burst pressure resistance during cold temperature conditions and greater fatigue strength. Failing to use this filter could result in external oil leaks due to gasket blowout or wrench flute cracks.

Any time an oil filter is changed on one of the above vehicles, it is recommended to use the new and improved filter.

Parts Information

Refer to the Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine the proper part numbers for your specific application.

Version

2

Modified

Released February 04, 2019

September 11, 2020 – Added the XT6 Model, added the 2021 Model Year to certain vehicles and updated the Involved Region or Country section.

GM bulletins are intended for use by professional technicians, NOT a "do-it-yourselfer".  They are written to inform these technicians of conditions that may occur on some vehicles, or to provide information that could assist in the proper service of a vehicle.  Properly trained technicians have the equipment, tools, safety instructions, and know-how to do a job properly and safely.  If a condition is described, DO NOT assume that the bulletin applies to your vehicle, or that your vehicle will have that condition.  See your GM dealer for information on whether your vehicle may benefit from the information.

999999994.gif

WE SUPPORT VOLUNTARY TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION

 
© 2021 General Motors.  All rights reserved.
Posted
53 minutes ago, MS3DALE said:

Yes, GM actually requires the use of the UPF63R in the 3.6 Blazer (as well as some other 3.6 applications such as the Camaro) due to the higher oil pressure.

 

Bypass spring pressure has nothing to do with oil pressure. It has to do with the pressure drop over the filter media. 

 

47 minutes ago, MS3DALE said:

Today's engines have very tight tolerances

 

Oh boy. What they meant to say was clearances. Tolerances are "the acceptable deviation from a specification", and have nothing to do with anything being discussed here. The clearances, HOT are the same as they have been for about 120 years. Cold has changed some. Example might be the use of hypereutectic pistons. They have a much tighter cold fit but the same hot running clearance as a forged racing piston. Bearing clearances are pretty standard at a thou per inch of bearing diameter. Finishes are finer and the leading reason for the ability to spec a thinner lubricant. The only down side to running a slightly thicker oil is drag. It cost you some fuel. 

 

In general people seem to believe that the viscosity on the label is what that viscosity will be in the motor. Far from true. Viscosity is a function of HEAT not rhetoric on a label or in a document. Film thickness a function of viscosity, velocity and load. Stribeck Curve???  Again this hasn't changed since God created the laws of the universe and never will. The results that draw the curve based on those equations have been pushed a bit by finishes. But not enough to reinvent lubrication. 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yes, and only a couple years before delivery. 🙄
    • So you're saying toss the baby out with the bathwater? @txab posted article was her take on how AI can be used to manipulate pricing as it already does and has been rebuked by the judiciasry in housing. How AI can be and is used to maximize refinery or even Amazon operations all of which are true but because she is who she is; that makes what she says about what is true, false? Is that something akin to Pre-justice aka prejudice?    Look, I'm first in line to approach all information with caution just because we live in a world where people like to lie about someone or something with such a straight face and in such volume that it makes digging to the truth wearisome. Meaning I understand the skepticisms but if I were to toss out everything a person is for a view they hold then my pool of people to draw wisdom from would be non-existent and I'd be forced to reinvent the wheel daily. Not practical.    "Be innocent as a dove but as cautious as a serpent."    Test each word. Every good lie is part truth or no one would believe it. Find the truth in it and reject what isn't.    On this one, AI is being used to do what has been done by hand for hundreds of years already but at such speed, the point of a computer, that it is more easily monetized. This one wasn't that hard a lift.    I wrote a few formulas in a Lotus 123 program decades ago, a series of linked Macros actually, that allowed a daily inventory to be turned into a running P&L and production plan. Something that took three departments a week to assemble now took the time it takes to input the 'daily changes' in inventory. Later that was ungraded to the more powerful Excel program an and integrated with bar code scanning, inventory to supply was done once per shift. It had a huge impact on production scheduling, Seamless interruption flexibility, inventory error reduction, raw materials cost effective utilization and scrap reduction. Huge improvement in the bottom line. I spent months on that and AI could have done it in minutes. So yes, it not only can be used, they would be foolish to not try. The legality, ethics and morality are not the domain of AI. Humans need to keep a reign on it. 
    • New to this forum.  Also looking to tune a 6L80 and trying to work out all the issues in my transmission swap.  I have a 6.2 diesel (1983) and have removed the TH-400 and about to put in a 6L80 with a TCM-2600 interface and don't have a clue what I doing after that.  Did you (Leatherneck/RAV3) get your slip resolved? I too hate to spend that kind of money on a tuner that hopefully I will not need too many times although from what steelerdude15 added about the HP Tuner being great for diagnostics would be a plus.  I am also from WNC but below you in Columbus.  Any helo would be greatly appreciated.  
    • Sounds like a smart reasonable person with common sense. Bill O’Riley never said he was just a journalist, by the way.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...