Jump to content

Troubleshooting Evap System / P0446

jsm10
 Share

Recommended Posts

jsm10 Enthusiast

jsm10

Posted
Posted

All,
So my 2007 Silverado had a check engine light. P0446/Evap vent circuit. I have done the following:

1.) Tested vent valve solenoid 25 cycles with a 12V battery charger. Functioned correctly.
2.) Tested purge valve solenoid 25 cycles. Functioned correctly.
3.) Removed hose to vent valve. Blew into it. Held thumb over it for 60s. Air whooshed back out.
4.) Gas cap gasket looks good. I put a little silicon oring grease around it just in case.

I replaced the vent valve solenoid thinking it might be failing intermittently. Still getting the P0446. The system does not seem to have any leak, unless it is very minor (or I would have thought the pressure I blew into it would have bled off).

I am guessing it must be the pressure sensor on top of the gas tank. I don't have a scanner to read real time values on that, though. I read that the WIFI ELM 327 OBD (about $20 on Amazon) will work with a phone with app iOBD2 and provide that real time pressure value (but not sure).

Any thoughts? Buy the ELM or just put a new pressure sensor on it and see if that fixes it? It seems I can feel it over the LHS frame rail and I think it just pulls out.

Thanks in advance!

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted

The proper way to diagnose this is with a Tech-2 and a gas cap adapter and smoke machine.  Since you've already replaced the vent solenoid, you might want to put a new gas cap on (they just don't only leak from gasket) before replacing the pressure sensor.

 

From the shop manual:

 

DTC P0446

Evaporative Emissions (EVAP) Vent System Performance

TYPICAL SCAN TOOL DATA

FTP Sensor Signal Voltage                                             Fuel Tank Pressure
1.5 V                                                         Atmospheric Pressure/BARO
Less than 1.5 V                                                           Positive Pressure
More than 1.5 V                                                  Negative Pressure/Vacuum


CIRCUIT/SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

This DTC tests the evaporative emission (EVAP) system for a restricted or blocked EVAP vent path 
that would cause excess amounts of vacuum to be developed in the EVAP system. With the purge valve 
open and the canister vent valve open, if the EVAP system vacuum goes above a calibrated threshold, 
the test will fail.

 

CONDITIONS FOR RUNNING THE DTC

● DTCs P0106, P0107, P0108, P0116, P0117, P0118, P0120, P0121, P0122, P0123, P0220, P0222, P0223, 
P0442, P0443, P0449, P0451, P0452, P0453, P0454, P0464, P0496, P0608, P0609, P0641, P0651, P1516, 
P2101, P2119, P2120, P2122, P2123, P2125, P2127, P2128, P2135, P2138 are not set.
●  The ignition voltage is between 11-18 volts.
●  The barometric pressure (BARO) is more than 74 kPa.
●  The fuel level is between 15-85 percent.
●  The engine coolant temperature (ECT) is less than 35°C (95°F).
●  The intake air temperature (IAT) is between 4-30°C (39-86°F).
●  DTC P0446 runs once per cold start when the above conditions are met.

CONDITIONS FOR SETTING THE DTC

●  The fuel tank vacuum is greater than 12 inches H2O vacuum for 5 seconds.

●  The FTP is less than -2.5 inches H2O or more than +5 inches for 60 seconds after a cold start.

 

ACTION TAKEN WHEN THE DTC SETS

 

DTC P0446 is a Type B DTC.

CONDITIONS FOR CLEARING THE MIL/DTC

 

DTC P0446 is a Type B DTC.

 

DIAGNOSTIC AIDS

● An intermittent condition could be caused by a damaged EVAP vent housing, a temporary blockage at 
the EVAP canister vent solenoid valve inlet, or a pinched vent hose. A blockage in the vent system 
will also cause a poor fuel fill condition.
●  An EVAP canister filter that is restricted can cause this DTC to set.

 

●  J 41413-200 EVAP Emission System Tester (EEST)
●  GE-41415-50 Fuel Tank Cap Adapter

 

CIRCUIT/SYSTEM VERIFICATION

1.   Ignition ON and fuel cap removed, verify that the FTP sensor parameter is between 1.3-1.7 
volts.
○  If not within the specified range, go to the FTP sensor section in Circuit/System Testing.
2.   Install the fuel cap.
3. With the engine running, the EVAP canister vent solenoid valve open and the EVAP canister purge 
solenoid valve commanded to 100 percent, the fuel tank vacuum should not increase to more than 11 
inches H2O.
○ If the fuel tank vacuum is greater than the specified range, go to the restriction section in 
Circuit/System Testing.
4. Operate the vehicle within the Conditions for Running the DTC. You may also operate the vehicle 
within the conditions that you observed from the Freeze Frame/Failure Records data.

CIRCUIT/SYSTEM TESTING

IMPORTANT: ● Refer to the J 41413-200 operation manual for detailed instructions in Evaporative 
Emission System Diagnosis .
● Perform the Circuit/System Verification before proceeding with the Circuit/System Testing.

Restriction

With the engine running, the EVAP canister vent solenoid valve open, and the EVAP canister purge 
solenoid valve commanded to 100 percent, the fuel tank vacuum should not increase to more than 11 
inches H2O.

○ If the fuel tank vacuum is greater than the specified value, isolate the restriction by 
disconnecting one component at a time while the EVAP canister purge solenoid valve is commanded to 
100 percent and the vent valve is open.

FTP Sensor

1.   Ignition ON and fuel cap removed, verify that the FTP sensor parameter is between 1.3-1.7 
volts.
○ If the FTP sensor parameter is not within the specified range, test the FTP low reference circuit 
for an open or high resistance. If the circuit tests normal, replace the FTP sensor.
2. Connect the J 41413-200 nitrogen/smoke hose to the J 41413-311 brass cone adapter. Disconnect 
the hose at the fuel cap end of the GE-41415-50 . Connect the J 41413-311 to the disconnected hose 
on the GE-41415-50 . Install the GE-41415-50 filler neck end only to the vehicle.
3.   Start the engine.
4.   Allow the engine to idle.
5.   Use the Purge/Seal function to seal the system with a scan tool.

6.   Command the EVAP canister purge solenoid valve to 20 percent.
7.   Observe the vacuum/pressure gage on the J 41413-200 and the FTP parameter on the scan tool.
8. Verify that the vacuum increases to the abort limit on the scan tool or more than 3.2 volts, and 
the value is similar between the scan tool and the vacuum/pressure gage on the J 41413-200 .
○  If the values are not similar, or the voltage is not within the specified range, replace the FTP 
sensor.
 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...