Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Currently working on my neighbor's 2014 GMC Sierra 1500 5.3 with a running rich condition. After following the technical bulletin including our fault code we found that the high pressure fuel pump is leaking fuel into the engine. I found the part but my neighbor is looking for a cheaper option. I've searched and searched for rebuild kits but I'm having no such luck. We're going to let it sit for now and hopefully we can find a kit. I plan on pulling and old off at a junk yard to tear down and see what we're dealing with. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 10/30/2021 at 9:24 AM, nwolfe20 said:

Currently working on my neighbor's 2014 GMC Sierra 1500 5.3 with a running rich condition. After following the technical bulletin including our fault code we found that the high pressure fuel pump is leaking fuel into the engine. I found the part but my neighbor is looking for a cheaper option. I've searched and searched for rebuild kits but I'm having no such luck. We're going to let it sit for now and hopefully we can find a kit. I plan on pulling and old off at a junk yard to tear down and see what we're dealing with. 

 

Can you elaborate more on "high fuel pump is leaking fuel into the engine".

 

Into the engine compartment? 

 

If your having wet crowns its likely the injectors are bleeding as that's the last fuel component going into the cylinder. 

 

FYI for a high pressure pump recall

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2015/SB-10057680-1621.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjQhtHYpZH0AhWUbs0KHbWrDPQQFnoECAsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1qP5RhS1ZZnpgcP3CQCVWd

Edited by 14burrito
Posted (edited)

I think he's saying the fuel pump is responsible for creating a rich condition?

 

I don't know much about how this system operates but I don't think that's possible. The injectors are controlled by the ecm. How much fuel, when, and how many times an injector fire's during any given combustion event is controlled. It's not affected by the pump unless it's not providing enough pressure.. Or too much pressure?

Edited by M1ck3y
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

I think he's saying the fuel pump is responsible for creating a rich condition?

 

I don't know much about how this system operates but I don't think that's possible. The injectors are controlled by the ecm. How much fuel, when, and how many times an injector fire's during any given combustion event is controlled. It's not affected by the pump unless it's not providing enough pressure.. Or too much pressure?

 

The way it reads to me: they were diagnosing rich running, found the high pressure pump leaking into the engine (fuel leak under the hood). 

 

That's why I was curious about more details.

 

If the high pressure pump was over/under supplying I would be led to believe that the fuel rail would register a fault for low fuel rail pressure or rail pressure too high.

 

I'd be suspect of the injectors leaking or sticking.

 

What codes was he getting? Bank 1 or 2 rich? Then he could just swap injectors between banks and see if the rich running condition follows the injectors. (Providing he doesn't have a flaw bench)

 

Rich condition only registered at start-up? Injectors could be bleeding causing excess fuel upon engine start and the condition rectifies once fuels burned.

 

Etc etc

 

I'm curious more details.

Edited by 14burrito
  • Like 1
Posted

Both banks were rich. It only throws the codes when the truck idles for an extended period of time. My scan tool had a tsb attached with the codes and once we followed through its troubleshooting guide it led us to the high pressure fuel pump. I didn't know there was a recall on them. 

Screenshot_20211115-123336_Adobe Acrobat.jpg

  • 1 month later...
Posted

There is no "rebuild kits" or 3rd party alternatives for the HPFP, the only one you can get is the GM HPFP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...