Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, shakenfake said:

One day is probably an exaggeration but I mean you are basically tearing down the whole engine to swap lifters etc. So yes it is a larger job but it is nothing crazy crazy

 

Also OP you are not going to get 500 out of just a cam swap. Don't worry about the tranny at all.


Yea, I figure I'd be lucky to get 70-80HP from breather mods and a stage 4 BTR cam.

Posted (edited)

your gonna be down awhile, you might as well ship the truck to a "profession tuning shop" and give em $10K to do it right without any hick ups.  luckily if you got a pre 2017 model truck the tuning is fast and affordable.

 

If all your aiming for is 500 hp and you pull the motor, better off buying a set of Katec cnc heads $500-$2500depending on your mods.  ,use what ever cam you like, and lt5 Throttle Body, e85 sensor activation, and stock manifolds ,  and tuning the engine/trans for the added power. this is a simpler option than aftermarket supercharger as tuning is easier . N/A induction upgrade you can getaway for awhile running the stock tune until you find a tuner.  not so much on the S/C. https://shop.katechengines.com/product/cnc-port-gen-5-lt1-l86-cylinder-heads-pair/  I would install 1 mm oversized Intake valve or larger..

 

blended heads with cfm flow numbers..https://shop.katechengines.com/product/cnc-porting-bundle-l83-cylinder-heads-pair/

 

 only benefit i see with the supercharger is there is always more room to grow with power.   you also have to source the LT injectors, pumps, etc, etc....the list of parts is getting longer and availability durring pandemic and the EV transition, parts will be shrinking and harder to find Yadda yadda

 

search the forum for truck builds everything you want to do has been done and documented, this will give you a good map to follow .

 

 

 

 

Edited by pokismoki
Posted

After thinking about it more I will probably just do a stage 2 BTR cam and get a dyno tune honestly. I'm a utility truck type of guy, a blower would be cool but I'd prefer doing it to a 6.2 or performance oriented vehicle if bothering to make the conversion. I'm already in this 1500 for more than I'd like just for brakes, wheels, tires, steering, and suspension.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

yeah I would just buy a 6.2 Camaro, trucks are utilitarian, heavy and cant handle for squat

 

you can still do simple factory mods, like the LT5 TB,  pull out the CAI baffle, install a airaid Jr.  delete 3rd cat, cut the flapper out, install 175 thermostat,retune cooling fans , and have tuner activate your e85 and Power enrichment tables. these alone are gonna make impressive power on stock induction

Edited by pokismoki
  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, pokismoki said:

your gonna be down awhile, you might as well ship the truck to a "profession tuning shop" and give em $10K to do it right without any hick ups.  luckily if you got a pre 2017 model truck the tuning is fast and affordable.

Jesus, if you are dropping $10k to do this job you are doing something wrong.

Posted

thats what it cost these days to get things done correctly, inflation and incompetance among tuners and mechanics is running rampant. finding someone with the experience, skill and attention to details requires $$$$$$$  these ain't your grandpas small block anymore

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, pokismoki said:

yeah I would just buy a 6.2 Camaro, trucks are utilitarian, heavy and cant handle for squat

 

you can still do simple factory mods, like the LT5 TB,  pull out the CAI baffle, install a airaid Jr.  delete 3rd cat, cut the flapper out, install 175 thermostat,retune cooling fans , and have tuner activate your e85 and Power enrichment tables. these alone are gonna make impressive power on stock induction


Taking notes on those things, thanks. Wish the search function on this forum was worth a spit, I'd have been all over this stuff already.

I figured it would be safe to estimate about $12-14K for a pro shop DOD delete and FI ballpark between the blower $6K, fuel pump $300, Katech oil pump $500, LT4 +30% injectors $2.5K, and custom tune $500-800. I already have the lifters and DOD delete kit purchased, which was around $1.3K, so I guess $10K for the blower job rings true to me if outsourced. Might be able to get away with dimpling the factory pump and shimming the valve, and/or getting secondhand injectors. I've never done aftermarket FI though, so I really have no idea.

I'm probably wrong and just erring on the side of bring enough to pay so I can play. I've heard folks doing a supercharger specific cam to grant better driveability as well, which I would like to avoid but have no insight on one way or the other.

Edited by Truckboattruck
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

while ur taking notes, have tuner disable the TCC in 1,2,3,and4th gear, this mod alone feels like at least 10Hp from the feel of it.  stay away from the long tubes, as I feel this will raise the power band out of the lower rpm ,which is not good for a Towing truck.

 

 I like the Katech  Blended heads with valve job, those make 50cfm over their l83 ported head.  add a bigger intake valve and you might gain 80-90 cfm on the intake side. 

I like simple things, less parts, simpler tuning the better

 

you got some research to do..  take into account the Variable cam system might need to be tuned in or locked out if you have too much lift. there have been guys who installed the big cam and didnt lock out the variable cam, only to chew up the valves in the head. more lift is also more pressure on valvetrain so milage and durability are reduced, might want to find a cam that hold the door open longer instead of opening the door further if you know what i mean.

Edited by pokismoki
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I was going to check out the L86 manifolds and throttle bodies, but didn't know the radiator could be swapped too. That's awesome.

Edit: I think I already have that spec rad as it seems to be one for the 5.3L Heavy Tow package, which I just bought a full aluminum version of to retrofit to my non-Z85 and preemptively replace my OEM rad.

Edited by Truckboattruck
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...