Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

This is a remanufactured 8" HMI Display Link for 2014 - 2018 Silverado $550

THIS FITS THE FOLLOWING VEHICLE APPLICATIONS:

2014 - 2018 GMC Sierra

2015 - 2018 Chevrolet Silverado

DESCRIPTION

  • FACTORY OEM STEREO RADIO TOUCH SCREEN RECEIVER
  • ITEM IS IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION
  • ITS  FULLY FUNCTIONAL AND GUARANTEE TO FIT AND WORK AS INTENDED
  • WORKS WITH FACTORY BACKUP CAMERA AND STEERING WHEEL CONTROLS
  • THIS HAS A SLIVER FINISH ON THE RADIO
  • Part Numbers:
  • 84096255 84203827, 84638208, 84096258, 84096267, 84096268,
  • 84482488,
  • 23383717,
  • 84133797,
  • 84203826,
  • 84540936

 

  • RADIO IS WORKING AND ALL FUNCTIONS AT 100%

 

 

 

20220505_083839.jpg

 

20220505_083850.jpg

 

BeforeandAFter.thumb.JPG.c160937aa3f67e4632e0d2c006d384eb.JPG

Edited by DBrach
Sold
Posted (edited)

That’s not how this works, if u have the small screen u need to get another radio module (programmed to your vin) screens don’t need programming FYI I’ve swapped my screen a few times no programming need. Damn 550$ is kinda expensive 😂 ****** I can barely get 150/200$ for mine 

Edited by Frankielozano214
Posted

Good to know. I've always had the 8" and updated from IO5 to IO6 and yes, had to program the module but not the screen. I updated the photos so thank you. I finally upgraded to the 12.1" Tesla style screen. I'm going off of eBay. Dude on there has sold 22 of them for more than this. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 5/7/2022 at 4:02 PM, DBrach said:

Good to know. I've always had the 8" and updated from IO5 to IO6 and yes, had to program the module but not the screen. I updated the photos so thank you. I finally upgraded to the 12.1" Tesla style screen. I'm going off of eBay. Dude on there has sold 22 of them for more than this. 

Is the IO6 the Andriod Auto/Carplay capable version?  Do you have that for sale?

Posted
3 hours ago, UofAZCats said:

Is the IO6 the Andriod Auto/Carplay capable version?  Do you have that for sale?

Yes, the IO6 is the Android Auto capable version and I have that installed in my truck. I don't have one for sale. Check eBay though, a bunch on there!

Posted (edited)

Bump

Edited by DBrach
Posted
23 hours ago, DBrach said:

Reduced - $450

Reduced? you had it for $400 on May 11.

Posted
9 minutes ago, bwlaqua said:

Reduced? you had it for $400 on May 11.

Yup, my BAD...editing now. Thanks for that catch :) 

  • DBrach changed the title to SOLD - 2014 - 2018 REPLACEMENT 8" Touch-Screen RADIO Display MYLINK
Posted

Yeah they do, I usually list on here Ebay cost minus the fees. Expands the buyer base for sure! 😁

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks tight. Not a lot of working room. Hows yous knuckles?
    • Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...