Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think these will fit, but would like confirmation before hitting buy

 

2020 stock RST Crew. 275/60r20 stock suspension no leveling

 

VAPOR - D569 / BLACK W/DDT
6 LUG

D56920909850

  • WHEEL SPECS:

    • Size: 20x9
    • Bolt Pattern: 6X135 / 6x139.7
    • Offset: 1
    • Hub: 106.10
Posted
24 minutes ago, Russ757 said:

I think these will fit, but would like confirmation before hitting buy

 

2020 stock RST Crew. 275/60r20 stock suspension no leveling

 

VAPOR - D569 / BLACK W/DDT
6 LUG

D56920909850

  • WHEEL SPECS:

    • Size: 20x9
    • Bolt Pattern: 6X135 / 6x139.7
    • Offset: 1
    • Hub: 106.10

It would help if you'd post a picture but, with a 106 bore, that isn't a hub centric wheel. GM trucks don't like wheels that aren't hub centric. I wouldn't run it.

Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, mafd2 said:

It would help if you'd post a picture but, with a 106 bore, that isn't a hub centric wheel. GM trucks don't like wheels that aren't hub centric. I wouldn't run it.

 

I've see them on  a few 1500s as this Pic shows.

https://www.customwheeloffset.com/wheel-offset-gallery/1690177/2020-chevrolet-silverado-1500-fuel-vapor-rough-country-leveling-kit

 

But when using online verifications say they work and some don't, so appreciate it. 

 

That's a link showing them installed but as popular as they seem to be, I don't see many on 1500s

 

 

 

 

 

fcda09508ad524da3419ffa71627b223.webp

Edited by Russ757
Posted (edited)

OK apparently these won't fit but pn D56920909849 will. Only difference is +1mm offset

 

But here's the specs guaranteed to fit

  • Diameter: 20
  • Width: 9
  • Lug Count: 6
  • Bolt Pattern (Metric): 6x135/6x139.7
  • Bolt Pattern (Standard): 6x135/5.5
  • Offset: 2
  • Backspacing: 5.08
  • Center Bore: 106.1

 

Edited by Russ757
Posted

Not running a 78mm hub centric bore is likely to cause a vibration.  Then you'll have a problem pinpointing the vibration not knowing if it's a balancing, wheel or tire issue.  They make hub centric rings but not sure how effective that is. I'd prefer a hub centric wheel. Just saying. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Hub centric rings work just fine if the bore isn't the same size.

 

I just hate the cheap look of the plastic hub cover.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Hub centric rings work just fine if the bore isn't the same size.

 

I just hate the cheap look of the plastic hub cover.

I've seen plastic hub rings. I think there's aluminum though which would seem better but I'd rather a hub centric wheel.  I'm not a fan of hub rings and spacers.

Edited by mafd2
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, mafd2 said:

It would help if you'd post a picture but, with a 106 bore, that isn't a hub centric wheel. GM trucks don't like wheels that aren't hub centric. I wouldn't run it.

I've run hub centric rings that match the hub and wheel bore on many trucks I've had.

Edited by jaxcam02
Posted

I'm gonna call fuel tomorrow and verify. I can piece together the first set for 1k but the one recommended will be 1.5k and the only difference is 1mm offset from what I can find

Posted
5 hours ago, Russ757 said:

I'm gonna call fuel tomorrow and verify. I can piece together the first set for 1k but the one recommended will be 1.5k and the only difference is 1mm offset from what I can find

So one is 106 and one hub centric bore? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 801 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...