Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It looks possible to put a block between the axle and the plate under the mono leaf. Just need to size the u bolts. They seam to be 9/16" but it's measuring 3 3/8" between which is not a common width.

 

IMG_0216.HEICIMG_0216.HEIC

 

 

Posted (edited)

It looks possible to put a block between the axle and the plate under the mono leaf. Just need to size the u bolts. They seam to be 9/16" but it's measuring 3 3/8" between which is not a common width.

 

IMG_0216.thumb.jpg.bf2270cce45c723f55a14ef0834355e6.jpgIMG_0217.thumb.jpg.849faa47daeeeb30605410bcd06228cc.jpg

Edited by latreille89
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 11/19/2022 at 4:40 PM, latreille89 said:

It looks possible to put a block between the axle and the plate under the mono leaf. Just need to size the u bolts. They seam to be 9/16" but it's measuring 3 3/8" between which is not a common width.

 

IMG_0216.thumb.jpg.bf2270cce45c723f55a14ef0834355e6.jpgIMG_0217.thumb.jpg.849faa47daeeeb30605410bcd06228cc.jpg

Wonder if it’s a taper block or if I could just use the one that comes with a 6 inch lift kit? Anyone try it on a mono leaf? 

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 6 months later...
Posted

Has anyone found a solution to this yet?

Would like to go with a block.

 

Also will the TB/AT4 leaf springs bolt right up to the shackles on these?

Posted

I'm just going to drop these right here because I think they might help somebody.  Find them about 2 weeks ago while playing on ReadyLift's website.  I remembered them while reading this thread. 

 

https://www.readylift.com/rear-u-bolts-for-monoleaf-applications-only-gm-silverado-sierra-1500-2019-2023.html

 

https://www.readylift.com/mono-leaf-rear-block-kit-6-lift-kit-gm-silverado-sierra-1500-2019-2023.html

 

 

Posted
On 8/4/2023 at 11:02 AM, Hoopstar said:

Has anyone found a solution to this yet?

Would like to go with a block.

 

Also will the TB/AT4 leaf springs bolt right up to the shackles on these?


You can keep your leafs. There’s a few kits now. Rough country also sells rounded ubolts at 3.25” wide which fit perfect. There’s a 1/4” plate under the leaf that’s 3” wide to give the leafs full bearing for the axle. Keep that. Put a block under it. RC nylon blocks seem to fit well. Yes I know you shouldn’t stack blocks but I’m not considering that plate a block. It has lips and groves to hold it in place. Without it, the blocks are only 2.5” wide which I’m sure isn’t good for the leaf. Do at your own risk. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,931 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...