Jump to content

Where are the 8.1s??


Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm planning to buy a (slightly used) truck in the next few months, I'm interested in the GMC 2500HD Crew Cab. Since I like a lot of low-end torque, I like the 8.1L Vortec but I never see any on the dealer lots. I'm in San Antonio, TX and all I see here are the 6.0s and the Duramaxes, I've never seen any 8.1s on dealer lots, ever (at least from their on-line inventory listings). Is it just because Texas is pretty much diesel country or is there another reason: poor reliability, bad rep, etc. or do buyers simply order them instead of choosing from dealer inventory?

 

I know a Duramax is an option, but I don't tow anything, and don't drive enough miles to pay for the higher up-front and maintenance costs, although it probably would be pretty cool to have...

 

Any info is appreciated.

 

Thanks

Posted

i got mine late in the year (2003) but i had the same problem, and im in Maryland. I didnt want anything except the 8.1L ECSB LT. It took the dealer about 30 minutes to search one out, but he finally found one in PA. I bought it sight unseen and i love it. He only came up with 3 available in my region like i was looking for, and he did a 200 mile radius search. I dont think there is a reliabilty problem, i just dont think they sell as many 8.1L's as the 6.0's or Dmaxes, maybe not as much of a demand.

Posted

From what I have been told they are not very popular.. Plus I imagine when they do have them they can't mark them up as much as the Dmax's.. I was able to find one yesterday and took it for a test drive.. :rolleyes: Went right back in and had them write me up a order quote on one!! :jester: Those 8100's are sure a hoot to drive!! Should have mine towards the end of March!

 

Gary

Posted

Same problem here except I never even see any Dmaxes, all 6.0l. I think they are able to move the 6.0s faster.

Posted

Thanks for the replies. I guess that all makes sense.

 

Does anyone have a torque curve graph of the 6.0? I'd like to know what kind of low-end this engine has, since I can get one for less $$$ than the 8.1 and, of course, the Duramax. 360ft-lbs of torque sounds good, but it's at 4000rpm. Wondering what it has at, say, ~2000rpm.

Posted

I am new here but, I wanted to add that I was going to order a 2500HD Crew with the 8.1L and ML6 trans. I was told GM will not build that combo until the 2nd Qtr of 04. April 04 to be exact. My order could not be taken until around March. I do not want to wait until May until truck possibly hits the ground so, I may have to settle for a 6.0L. :rolleyes:

Posted

If you guys aren't regularly towing over 9000lbs, the 6.0L will be more than sufficient. The 8.1L certainly isn't any faster than a 6.0L around town, it can just tow a lot more weight.

 

The 8.1L is derived on the old, tried and true Big block, the 6.0L is derived from new LS1 architecture which is proving to be a very solid setup.

 

Can't go wrong either way, unless you're towing a ton of weight, well, more than 4-5 tons to be exact. :rolleyes:

Posted

i have to respectfully disagree QUIKAG. I have an 8.1L and have 2 friends that have the 6.0L, one is a reg cab long bed, and one is a ext cab short bed. Off the line there is no contest, im outta the hole much faster than the 6.0L (thats where the extra 100 ft/lbs of torque come in). From 0-90mph i beat both of them by 2 trunk lengths. All three vehicles are completely stock. I am not trying to start anything because there maybe some stock 6.0's out there that can beat the 8.1 stock, but not in my experience. Both vehicles are a great choice, i just dont want someone to spend a wad of cash and not be happy a year down the road when their dream vehicle is available. My sugestion is to test drive both of them, if you like the 6.0 as much as the 8.1 then drive it home. I can tell you, punching the pedal in a RAT is way different than punching it in a small block. Either way im sure you will enjoy your new Chevy... :rolleyes:

Posted
here ya go

l18curve.jpg

The graph is for pre-2004 8.1Ls.

 

Not that the graph will look much different, but GM down-rated the peak HP & Torque numbers for the '04 8.1L engines.

 

The new ones are rated 330hp @ 4200rpm and 450lb-ft @ 3200rpm.

 

I like gasoline engines over diesels as a matter of preference and you won't go wrong with the 8.1L. Just take your time and find what you want. Don't talk yourself into buying the 6.0L if it's not what you really want! :rolleyes:

 

You run into the same thing with other makes/engines too. When Dodge was still making the 8.0L for their HD Rams it was almost impossible to find one without ordering it. The salesman where I bought my F250 told me they only order 1 out of every 7 Superduties with the 6.8L V10. Most of them are basic V8s or loaded $40K+ diesels.

Posted

linda,

Thanks for the link. I had seen this site before but lost the address, now I've bookmarked it. :lol: It looks like the 6.0 still has a decent amount of torque at the low-end, though. I'll find out when I drive one; good thing is it should easy to find a 6.0.

 

 

Most of them are basic V8s or loaded $40K+ diesels.

 

That's definitely the problem down here. Most of the trucks I see are either company work trucks (totally stripped down) or fully loaded diesels - I've actually seen many come close to $50K :jester: I'm also looking at the Super Duty and the V10 is also tough to find, too. I always seem to want the things that are hardest to find... :rolleyes:

Posted

sorry, HILLHOUND is correct. I should have prefaced that reply with the fact that those were 2003 and <. I doubt the layman will notive the 10HP and 5 ft/lbs of torque difference, but it is there non the less. I just like the fact that no matter where i am in my RPM band, from 900rpm - 4800rpm, im never out of the 400+ft/lbs of torque range. I am not a direct recipient yet, but ive been told that with a new air intake, exhaust, and the westers tune the numbers are more along the lines of 405hp and 550ft/lbs of torque. I will let you know soon enough.... :rolleyes:

Posted

Why not order the vehicle you want? My dad's done this 2x now, though with a different manufacturer. He couldn't find what he wanted on the lot, no dealers were stocking the optimum towing config for the vehicles he was looking at with the other options he wanted, so he ended up ordering. Both times they had to build a second truck for him though. The first truck (in 2000) never left the plant, the other one, that's still on order never made it to the dealer, damaged in shipping along with all but 14 out of 300 on the boat his was on. Oh yeah, at least on the second truck he ordered, this was reflected in the RPOs, that the order was pushed as far to the front of the line as it could be, and that it was a re-order, as well as 2 others but can't remember them.

 

Anyway, ordering is the only way to get EXACTLY what you want, otherwise you're just "settling" for what the dealers think you want. I've been happy buying used trucks, but I'm not looking for optimal towing configs, I'm just commuting and running misc. errands.

Posted

Unfortunately, in my case ordering is pretty much out of the question. First is the cost, ordering a brand-new 8.1 would hit around $40K, definitely out of my range. Second is the time required - I think the average build-time is around 6-8 weeks or something like that, and I'm planning to sell my car privately (I'll see what dealers will offer on a trade-in but I know it'll be ridiculously low) which means once I sell my car, I won't have anything to drive to work. I guess I could rent a car for two months, but that would add up, too. Finally (this is related to #1), is the huge depreciation of a new vehicle, I really don't want to get hit with that. I bought my current car new, and the amount of depreciation in the first 1-2 years is staggering.

 

I guess it boils down to the high cost of a new vehicle (maybe I should have tried getting into law school...). I think getting something that's slightly used, not beaten to death, but enough to take some of the bite out of the price (like 1-2 yrs old), is the most cost-effective option.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...